The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Aranmanai 4. as an ATD. If you strongly object to this Redirection, feel free to take it to
WP:RFD. LizRead!Talk! 07:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources are all about
Aranmanai 4, but make no mention of "Baakghost" or "Baak" (except in one source "Baak" is mentioned but it appears to be a character from
Aranmanai 4." A hoax? Cleo Cooper (
talk) 06:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
A note that I have just nominated this for speedy deletion, even the IMDb doesn't exist for this "film". Cleo Cooper (
talk) 06:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Aranmanai 4, unless this version differs significantly. See my comment on TP (where I contested G3) -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC) (Comment edited after I removed the CSD tag from the page)reply
Good catch, I also support redirect. Cleo Cooper (
talk) 20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete:Baakghost is incorrect; it is Baak. Kailash29792(talk) 07:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, that is right, I forgot to mention that; but the content/subject being the said film, I find it is fairer, so as to be able to keep page history and credits, to renameafter it's kept as redirect, than to plainly delete. That's what is generally done when the title of an Afded article appears to be incorrect. But thanks. -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: It looks like just a copy-edited version of
Aranmanai 4; Just an unnecessary
content fork. Redirecting is pointless as not even the Google recognizes the name.
See here𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (
ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete This article is totally unnecessary.
Grabup (
talk) 15:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, but move the poster to the other article if possible. Looks cool. (
141.132.22.10 (
talk) 08:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC))reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Aranmanai 4. as an ATD. If you strongly object to this Redirection, feel free to take it to
WP:RFD. LizRead!Talk! 07:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources are all about
Aranmanai 4, but make no mention of "Baakghost" or "Baak" (except in one source "Baak" is mentioned but it appears to be a character from
Aranmanai 4." A hoax? Cleo Cooper (
talk) 06:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
A note that I have just nominated this for speedy deletion, even the IMDb doesn't exist for this "film". Cleo Cooper (
talk) 06:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Aranmanai 4, unless this version differs significantly. See my comment on TP (where I contested G3) -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC) (Comment edited after I removed the CSD tag from the page)reply
Good catch, I also support redirect. Cleo Cooper (
talk) 20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete:Baakghost is incorrect; it is Baak. Kailash29792(talk) 07:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, that is right, I forgot to mention that; but the content/subject being the said film, I find it is fairer, so as to be able to keep page history and credits, to renameafter it's kept as redirect, than to plainly delete. That's what is generally done when the title of an Afded article appears to be incorrect. But thanks. -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: It looks like just a copy-edited version of
Aranmanai 4; Just an unnecessary
content fork. Redirecting is pointless as not even the Google recognizes the name.
See here𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (
ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete This article is totally unnecessary.
Grabup (
talk) 15:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, but move the poster to the other article if possible. Looks cool. (
141.132.22.10 (
talk) 08:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC))reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.