The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete a totally unsourced article. That this article has survived 16 years may make it an even bigger scandal than
Barahir. My understanding is that notability guidelines were not even begun until 2006. We still are plagued by the early uncontrolled years of Wikipedia.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
This page survived 16 years as a redirect (with various targets), not this biography of a musician. The musician was only added to this page a few hours ago. --
Metropolitan90(talk)14:50, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - No notability. All that a bit of searching can confirm is essentially that this obscure artist really exists and has continued to release material.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk)
14:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect The article was a reasonable redirect for most of its life, no reason not to reinstate that. It's had a few different targets in its lifetime,
B52 (disambiguation) seems like the most reasonable one to me. If this is done as an administrative action, in line with the consensus here, anyone attempting to revert back to the article about the musician could expect to have their account blocked. (Deletion wouldn't be much of a barrier to anyone anyway, it's literally one sentence that someone could easily type again to recreate the page.)
GirthSummit (blether)13:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete a totally unsourced article. That this article has survived 16 years may make it an even bigger scandal than
Barahir. My understanding is that notability guidelines were not even begun until 2006. We still are plagued by the early uncontrolled years of Wikipedia.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
This page survived 16 years as a redirect (with various targets), not this biography of a musician. The musician was only added to this page a few hours ago. --
Metropolitan90(talk)14:50, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - No notability. All that a bit of searching can confirm is essentially that this obscure artist really exists and has continued to release material.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk)
14:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect The article was a reasonable redirect for most of its life, no reason not to reinstate that. It's had a few different targets in its lifetime,
B52 (disambiguation) seems like the most reasonable one to me. If this is done as an administrative action, in line with the consensus here, anyone attempting to revert back to the article about the musician could expect to have their account blocked. (Deletion wouldn't be much of a barrier to anyone anyway, it's literally one sentence that someone could easily type again to recreate the page.)
GirthSummit (blether)13:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.