The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
The sources are all very short pieces that have no by-line in sources that seem to be mostly user-generated such as imdb, haber life, kimnereli where you can email your bio for publication etc etc. The sites seem to have no staff. This is a case of way
WP:TOOSOON. Nothing in a before search of interest
Dom from Paris (
talk) 12:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC).reply
Keep it is not a valid reason for me because there is no such thing as every news headline will be long, and when it comes to IMDb, there may be only known people in IMDb.
Paulahted(T) 8 August 2019 (UTC) —
Paulahted (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Paulahted: the above comment is your only edit to Wikipedia – you joined Wikipedia just to comment on this AfD?
Richard3120 (
talk) 20:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete All the sources are the same biographical paragraph, he does't pass
WP:GNG he maybe notable someday but he's not notable now. Whispering(
t) 15:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Doesn't seem to be notable. The sources are unreliable and they do not help with establishing the subject's notability. He does not pass
WP:GNG, at least for now. Keivan.fTalk 06:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep Resources seem to be sufficient. It's okay to stay. What is mentioned in the news is that the person (child) is slowly becoming a nationally recognized child. Kimnereli.net is a site where only well-known people are present and their personal information is provided. Sites like: famousbirthdays.com The information available by e-mail is an option for lesser-known people, and in such cases there is the “special request” sign in parentheses.
Prianhana(T) 7:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC) —
Prianhana (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep editors of kimnereli style sites find things like birth date, height, biography from the internet. If they can’t find. E-mail option is available to receive e-mail from people who know it or from the manager of that famous name In very rare cases famous people can also e-mail.
Huriyeot45(T) 9:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC) —
Huriyeot45 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Comment to closing administrator:
WP:MEATPUPPET alert – every one of the "keep" voters has joined Wikipedia in the last 24 hours, and all of them by coincidence have decided to use the same font for their signatures.
Richard3120 (
talk) 13:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - as not currently meeting
WP:NBIO, created by a sock and supported by a flock of sox.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 07:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep There seems to be some problems with the sources, but I think the person is worth notable.
User:Kimfromkorea (
talk) 10:51, 11 August 2019 (UTC) blocked sock
Dom from Paris (
talk) 16:36, 11 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep Once the necessary resources are added and corrected, the person can be everytime notable. (
talk) 16:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)—(
talk) Striking yet another blocked sockpuppet !vote...this must be a record! --
Dom from Paris (
talk) 12:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
The sources are all very short pieces that have no by-line in sources that seem to be mostly user-generated such as imdb, haber life, kimnereli where you can email your bio for publication etc etc. The sites seem to have no staff. This is a case of way
WP:TOOSOON. Nothing in a before search of interest
Dom from Paris (
talk) 12:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC).reply
Keep it is not a valid reason for me because there is no such thing as every news headline will be long, and when it comes to IMDb, there may be only known people in IMDb.
Paulahted(T) 8 August 2019 (UTC) —
Paulahted (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Paulahted: the above comment is your only edit to Wikipedia – you joined Wikipedia just to comment on this AfD?
Richard3120 (
talk) 20:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete All the sources are the same biographical paragraph, he does't pass
WP:GNG he maybe notable someday but he's not notable now. Whispering(
t) 15:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Doesn't seem to be notable. The sources are unreliable and they do not help with establishing the subject's notability. He does not pass
WP:GNG, at least for now. Keivan.fTalk 06:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep Resources seem to be sufficient. It's okay to stay. What is mentioned in the news is that the person (child) is slowly becoming a nationally recognized child. Kimnereli.net is a site where only well-known people are present and their personal information is provided. Sites like: famousbirthdays.com The information available by e-mail is an option for lesser-known people, and in such cases there is the “special request” sign in parentheses.
Prianhana(T) 7:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC) —
Prianhana (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep editors of kimnereli style sites find things like birth date, height, biography from the internet. If they can’t find. E-mail option is available to receive e-mail from people who know it or from the manager of that famous name In very rare cases famous people can also e-mail.
Huriyeot45(T) 9:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC) —
Huriyeot45 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Comment to closing administrator:
WP:MEATPUPPET alert – every one of the "keep" voters has joined Wikipedia in the last 24 hours, and all of them by coincidence have decided to use the same font for their signatures.
Richard3120 (
talk) 13:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - as not currently meeting
WP:NBIO, created by a sock and supported by a flock of sox.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 07:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep There seems to be some problems with the sources, but I think the person is worth notable.
User:Kimfromkorea (
talk) 10:51, 11 August 2019 (UTC) blocked sock
Dom from Paris (
talk) 16:36, 11 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep Once the necessary resources are added and corrected, the person can be everytime notable. (
talk) 16:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)—(
talk) Striking yet another blocked sockpuppet !vote...this must be a record! --
Dom from Paris (
talk) 12:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.