The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Completly irrelevant player in lower tier junior ice hockey leagues. He has not achieved anything notable. He fails WP:SPORTCRIT and specifically WP:NHOCKEY in all points. There are a few passing mentionings on him on some non-notable webpages, but its not enough to pass WP:GNG. Most of the article is pretty much trivia, especially the lead. It should therefore be deleted.
Dead Mary (
talk) 14:02, 29 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails NHOCKY as well as GNG. ~EDDY(
talk/
contribs)~ 15:08, 29 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - not finding any evidence of notability, either through receiving significant coverage nor from meeting
WP:NHOCKEY. Even if this subject was notable, the article would need substantial revision as it currently reads as a resume.
Rlendog (
talk) 16:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Completly irrelevant player in lower tier junior ice hockey leagues. He has not achieved anything notable. He fails WP:SPORTCRIT and specifically WP:NHOCKEY in all points. There are a few passing mentionings on him on some non-notable webpages, but its not enough to pass WP:GNG. Most of the article is pretty much trivia, especially the lead. It should therefore be deleted.
Dead Mary (
talk) 14:02, 29 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails NHOCKY as well as GNG. ~EDDY(
talk/
contribs)~ 15:08, 29 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - not finding any evidence of notability, either through receiving significant coverage nor from meeting
WP:NHOCKEY. Even if this subject was notable, the article would need substantial revision as it currently reads as a resume.
Rlendog (
talk) 16:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.