From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Channel mergers. Daniel ( talk) 04:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Audio Visions

Audio Visions (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG as a defunct satellite radio station. Perhaps redirect this to XM Satellite Radio channel history? Let'srun ( talk) 03:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio. Let'srun ( talk) 03:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Channel mergers: this is the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable pre-merger XM channels that were replaced by its Sirius counterpart (if not associated with another notable parent entity). As I've mentioned before, even the pre-2021 version of the NRADIO essay, amidst its overpresumption of notability on the broadcast side, did not do so for satellite radio channels and instead took the stance that independent media coverage would determine any notability, though it did not explicitly defer to GNG the way the current version of essay does. If you can't even meet a more-lenient non-guideline, meeting GNG would appear to be impossible. (I also cannot help but note the hatnote pointing to a completely unrelated but similarly-named album named Audio-Visions…) WCQuidditch 04:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Channel mergers. Daniel ( talk) 04:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Audio Visions

Audio Visions (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG as a defunct satellite radio station. Perhaps redirect this to XM Satellite Radio channel history? Let'srun ( talk) 03:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio. Let'srun ( talk) 03:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Channel mergers: this is the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable pre-merger XM channels that were replaced by its Sirius counterpart (if not associated with another notable parent entity). As I've mentioned before, even the pre-2021 version of the NRADIO essay, amidst its overpresumption of notability on the broadcast side, did not do so for satellite radio channels and instead took the stance that independent media coverage would determine any notability, though it did not explicitly defer to GNG the way the current version of essay does. If you can't even meet a more-lenient non-guideline, meeting GNG would appear to be impossible. (I also cannot help but note the hatnote pointing to a completely unrelated but similarly-named album named Audio-Visions…) WCQuidditch 04:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook