The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is there that this subject meets the relevant standard. ESPNCricinfo is sufficient as a source.
bd2412T 03:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Strong delete The sourcing entirely fails the general notability guidelines. It is time to scrap the notability guidelines on cricket that are way too broad.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
05:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep, meets
WP:N, "It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right".
Harriastalk10:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is there that this subject meets the relevant standard. ESPNCricinfo is sufficient as a source.
bd2412T 03:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Strong delete The sourcing entirely fails the general notability guidelines. It is time to scrap the notability guidelines on cricket that are way too broad.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
05:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep, meets
WP:N, "It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right".
Harriastalk10:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.