- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Appliance Technician
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Appliance Technician ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable appliance repair company in a Ottawa. The references are mostly fake. Instead of supporting the claims in the article they either have nothing to do with it or are covert attacks on competitors. Does not pass WP:NCORP. Mccapra ( talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy Delete. This is basically WP:G11 worthy. Half of those references don't even mention Canada, much less the company. --~ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 17:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete on balance. I see no notability here. Deb ( talk) 15:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet the requisite inclusion criteria. The coverage is just not indepth or broad enough. The content, while promotional, was not at my threshold for WP:G11. Did not decline-- another admin might G11. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Appliance Technician
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Appliance Technician ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable appliance repair company in a Ottawa. The references are mostly fake. Instead of supporting the claims in the article they either have nothing to do with it or are covert attacks on competitors. Does not pass WP:NCORP. Mccapra ( talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy Delete. This is basically WP:G11 worthy. Half of those references don't even mention Canada, much less the company. --~ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 17:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete on balance. I see no notability here. Deb ( talk) 15:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet the requisite inclusion criteria. The coverage is just not indepth or broad enough. The content, while promotional, was not at my threshold for WP:G11. Did not decline-- another admin might G11. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.