The result was no consensus, default to keep. Whether or not to remove the biographical information for which no sources are provided is an editorial decision. Sandstein 16:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable bio; uncited, entirely Original Research, contributed by the apparent grand-daughter of the subject. This does not mean that the subject might not have been a good or interesting person; he just wasn't notable/noted in any particular field for a contribution meriting recognition in an encyclopedia. One's ancestry may be important to oneself, but it's generally frowned upon to use Wikipedia for self-promotion of a biographical sort.- Leflyman Talk 07:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, default to keep. Whether or not to remove the biographical information for which no sources are provided is an editorial decision. Sandstein 16:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable bio; uncited, entirely Original Research, contributed by the apparent grand-daughter of the subject. This does not mean that the subject might not have been a good or interesting person; he just wasn't notable/noted in any particular field for a contribution meriting recognition in an encyclopedia. One's ancestry may be important to oneself, but it's generally frowned upon to use Wikipedia for self-promotion of a biographical sort.- Leflyman Talk 07:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) reply