The result was delete. Even though there are twice as many "keep" !votes as "delete" !votes, most of the "keep" !votes are not grounded in policy. Their rationales include WP:INTERESTING, WP:USEFUL, WP:VALINFO, and references to his current "fame." However, although a few of the "keep" !votes mention the possibility that he will not "remain a low-profile individual," they do not provide evidence that this does not fall under WP:BLP1E. There are many reliable sources available but nearly all are related to the event. Even the song, Auto-Tune the News, is related to the event; correctly, it does not have its own article but is rather a redirect. In the future, if the subject continues to receive coverage, recreation will be permitted. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC) reply
As prurient a BLP1E as I can imagine. Currently unsourced other than to Youtube videos. Note that this has already been speedied twice (the two previous deletions are unrelated). – iride scent 18:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep him! Why would you even consider deleting his Wiki page? He's a sensation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.140.231 ( talk) 19:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Even though there are twice as many "keep" !votes as "delete" !votes, most of the "keep" !votes are not grounded in policy. Their rationales include WP:INTERESTING, WP:USEFUL, WP:VALINFO, and references to his current "fame." However, although a few of the "keep" !votes mention the possibility that he will not "remain a low-profile individual," they do not provide evidence that this does not fall under WP:BLP1E. There are many reliable sources available but nearly all are related to the event. Even the song, Auto-Tune the News, is related to the event; correctly, it does not have its own article but is rather a redirect. In the future, if the subject continues to receive coverage, recreation will be permitted. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC) reply
As prurient a BLP1E as I can imagine. Currently unsourced other than to Youtube videos. Note that this has already been speedied twice (the two previous deletions are unrelated). – iride scent 18:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep him! Why would you even consider deleting his Wiki page? He's a sensation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.140.231 ( talk) 19:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC) reply