The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete we have no significant source coverage. There are no sources providing significant source coverage. Such is not really present for all olympic competitors. This is even more pronounced when we are dealing with those who competed in the first three modern Olympics.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
14:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete/Redirect - When most of the four-sentence stub isn't about the subject, the subject probably does not warrant its own article. And yeah, obligatory fails GNG. -
Indy beetle (
talk)
09:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Although redirect is OK, there's really not anything worthy of
preservation here, just db entries, and the subject is so obscure it's as likely they were looking for someone else, perhaps the theologian of the same name.
Jacona (
talk)
14:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete we have no significant source coverage. There are no sources providing significant source coverage. Such is not really present for all olympic competitors. This is even more pronounced when we are dealing with those who competed in the first three modern Olympics.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
14:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete/Redirect - When most of the four-sentence stub isn't about the subject, the subject probably does not warrant its own article. And yeah, obligatory fails GNG. -
Indy beetle (
talk)
09:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Although redirect is OK, there's really not anything worthy of
preservation here, just db entries, and the subject is so obscure it's as likely they were looking for someone else, perhaps the theologian of the same name.
Jacona (
talk)
14:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.