- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Amir Adnan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be insufficiently notable to meet WP:CORP. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Noted designer. Coverage such as here. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 01:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: He is notable. Sajjad Altaf ( talk) 00:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: the article, such as it is, is about a company. It appears not to meet our notability requirements for companies. The notability of the individual doesn't seem to be relevant to that. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The label is named for the designer. So, obviously, they are closely interelated. At some future point it might be worth considering separating out the man from his label, but that is a ways off if ever. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 03:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: The article has just been significantly expanded by an editor. Since there are no delete votes at this point, I have not notified any of the editors who have voted so far. ~ | twsx | talk cont | ~ 12:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The designer is notable and there are sources available on the internet. The article in its current form could do with better referencing. In addition to the source provided by Candleabracadabra, here is another news article: Will it be FPC or PFDC for Amir Adnan? Mar4d ( talk) 13:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Amir Adnan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be insufficiently notable to meet WP:CORP. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Noted designer. Coverage such as here. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 01:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: He is notable. Sajjad Altaf ( talk) 00:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: the article, such as it is, is about a company. It appears not to meet our notability requirements for companies. The notability of the individual doesn't seem to be relevant to that. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The label is named for the designer. So, obviously, they are closely interelated. At some future point it might be worth considering separating out the man from his label, but that is a ways off if ever. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 03:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: The article has just been significantly expanded by an editor. Since there are no delete votes at this point, I have not notified any of the editors who have voted so far. ~ | twsx | talk cont | ~ 12:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The designer is notable and there are sources available on the internet. The article in its current form could do with better referencing. In addition to the source provided by Candleabracadabra, here is another news article: Will it be FPC or PFDC for Amir Adnan? Mar4d ( talk) 13:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.