- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 14:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aly-Us ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable musical group with lack of independent reliable coverage. Only passing mentions in sources. Tinton5 ( talk) 04:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 08:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Disagree that it should be deleted. It is a true classic of the house-music genre. Added more citations re NPR, moby. If you google "the best classic house" and the track you get lots of hits.
This is a niche genre. Heavily African American. Also LGBT.
Ps - song has nearly 7m youtube views. Bhdshoes2 ( talk) 15:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhdshoes2 ( talk • contribs) 15:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Fixed misplaced comment. @ Bdshoes2:: New votes go at the bottom of the nomination. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄)
Tagging @Alansohn for his Jersey-centric viewpoint. Bhdshoes2 ( talk)
- Weak Support - Notability seems not too good, does not really meet WP:BAND, however, it is debatable. Wpgbrown talk | contribs 19:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep had a high charting release on a Billboard chart and has reliable sources coverage such as NPR and Allmusic, passes WP:NMUSIC Atlantic306 ( talk) 18:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep some sources in article are not indepedent; others indicate notability but not significant coverage. Search finds sources that could be added that would be enough for a short article such as this. "Follow Me" charted in the UK twice, both times outside the top 40 but in the top 75. Peter James ( talk) 21:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - The sources found by the previous voters must be added to the article to make it more viable. Those sources indicate that this group had one big song that charted in US and UK, which in turn generated a little media notice at the time and some more recent "lost classic"-style nostalgia. Should be enough for a presentable stub article, but it needs to be cleaned up. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 21:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 14:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aly-Us ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable musical group with lack of independent reliable coverage. Only passing mentions in sources. Tinton5 ( talk) 04:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 08:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Disagree that it should be deleted. It is a true classic of the house-music genre. Added more citations re NPR, moby. If you google "the best classic house" and the track you get lots of hits.
This is a niche genre. Heavily African American. Also LGBT.
Ps - song has nearly 7m youtube views. Bhdshoes2 ( talk) 15:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhdshoes2 ( talk • contribs) 15:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Fixed misplaced comment. @ Bdshoes2:: New votes go at the bottom of the nomination. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄)
Tagging @Alansohn for his Jersey-centric viewpoint. Bhdshoes2 ( talk)
- Weak Support - Notability seems not too good, does not really meet WP:BAND, however, it is debatable. Wpgbrown talk | contribs 19:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep had a high charting release on a Billboard chart and has reliable sources coverage such as NPR and Allmusic, passes WP:NMUSIC Atlantic306 ( talk) 18:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep some sources in article are not indepedent; others indicate notability but not significant coverage. Search finds sources that could be added that would be enough for a short article such as this. "Follow Me" charted in the UK twice, both times outside the top 40 but in the top 75. Peter James ( talk) 21:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - The sources found by the previous voters must be added to the article to make it more viable. Those sources indicate that this group had one big song that charted in US and UK, which in turn generated a little media notice at the time and some more recent "lost classic"-style nostalgia. Should be enough for a presentable stub article, but it needs to be cleaned up. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 21:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.