The result was keep. As noted on WP:N a topic can be considered notable if it meets GNG (which nobody is claiming here) or one of the subject-specific guidelines that include NACADEMIC; it's also not clear what "the article is poor in taste" refers to nor why it would require deletion. I know that some people advocate deletion of GNG-noncompliant articles even when they meet some other notability guideline and that this practice is often applied in AFD closes, but here I am not seeing anyone explicitly advocating for this. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
not that notable.
Ozar77 (
talk)
17:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Allyson Lawless was included in the Wikiproject Women in Red redlist index. Being an international fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering is notable. AllyCAD is well known as a low cost CAD option for engineers. Yes, the article needs more work. Searching her name on Google provides many sources that I need to dig through for quality before using them in the article. --
Madds212 (
talk)
17:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. As noted on WP:N a topic can be considered notable if it meets GNG (which nobody is claiming here) or one of the subject-specific guidelines that include NACADEMIC; it's also not clear what "the article is poor in taste" refers to nor why it would require deletion. I know that some people advocate deletion of GNG-noncompliant articles even when they meet some other notability guideline and that this practice is often applied in AFD closes, but here I am not seeing anyone explicitly advocating for this. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
not that notable.
Ozar77 (
talk)
17:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Allyson Lawless was included in the Wikiproject Women in Red redlist index. Being an international fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering is notable. AllyCAD is well known as a low cost CAD option for engineers. Yes, the article needs more work. Searching her name on Google provides many sources that I need to dig through for quality before using them in the article. --
Madds212 (
talk)
17:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)