The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It's not sufficient to say you did a Google search or write "Passes GNG". If you want this article to be Kept, you need to present specific sources that other editors can examine and verify. The fact that editors who have a lot of AFD experience are still relying on
WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is disappointing.
Keep A simple Google search showed several articles on reliable news media. I'm on the phone so I can't link them right now, but searching "Alfredo Rojas" "San Marcos de Arica" provides articles from La Tribuna, a newspaper from Biobío, and Soychile.cl, of El Mercurio, among many others, which in my opinion suffice to assert notability.
Bedivere (
talk)
15:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per Bedivere. Extensive pro career in professional Chilean football with may sources. Artilce needs imporvement, not deletion. Thanks,
Das osmnezz (
talk)
00:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - It's not sufficient to simply do a Google search (or worse yet to rely on someone else's Google search) and base a claim of notability on seeing a number of hits. We actually need to review the sources, and when I did, I found them wanting. A La Tribuna
article was the best source I could find which is a routine transfer announcement that includes more than just routine coverage of his career. This is not enough by itself to show compliance with the GNG.
Jogurney (
talk)
16:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It's not sufficient to say you did a Google search or write "Passes GNG". If you want this article to be Kept, you need to present specific sources that other editors can examine and verify. The fact that editors who have a lot of AFD experience are still relying on
WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is disappointing.
Keep A simple Google search showed several articles on reliable news media. I'm on the phone so I can't link them right now, but searching "Alfredo Rojas" "San Marcos de Arica" provides articles from La Tribuna, a newspaper from Biobío, and Soychile.cl, of El Mercurio, among many others, which in my opinion suffice to assert notability.
Bedivere (
talk)
15:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per Bedivere. Extensive pro career in professional Chilean football with may sources. Artilce needs imporvement, not deletion. Thanks,
Das osmnezz (
talk)
00:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - It's not sufficient to simply do a Google search (or worse yet to rely on someone else's Google search) and base a claim of notability on seeing a number of hits. We actually need to review the sources, and when I did, I found them wanting. A La Tribuna
article was the best source I could find which is a routine transfer announcement that includes more than just routine coverage of his career. This is not enough by itself to show compliance with the GNG.
Jogurney (
talk)
16:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.