The result was keep. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:52, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply
This artist fails both WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE for a lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources, and his work has not garnered its own significant coverage or presented any kind of significant concept, theory, or technique. Available information seems almost entirely from WP:BLPSPS and interview statements where the subject talks about himself with no editorial oversight from the publisher as to claims. Third party coverage should be readily available if this subject truly rises to CREATIVE levels, or even GNG, but there's precious little. JFHJr ( ㊟) 23:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:52, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply
This artist fails both WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE for a lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources, and his work has not garnered its own significant coverage or presented any kind of significant concept, theory, or technique. Available information seems almost entirely from WP:BLPSPS and interview statements where the subject talks about himself with no editorial oversight from the publisher as to claims. Third party coverage should be readily available if this subject truly rises to CREATIVE levels, or even GNG, but there's precious little. JFHJr ( ㊟) 23:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply