- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Addictiv ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Everything (Addictiv album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a musician and an article about her album, neither of which are
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing
WP:NMUSIC. The BLP asserts that she had singles peak #48 and #59 in the Canadian Hot 100, but (a) those chart positions aren't sourced at all, and even a Billboard search fails to verify them, and (b) they aren't high enough chart positions to confer an "inherent" notability freebie in the absence of any
WP:GNG-worthy sourcing. The "Canadian Radio Music Awards", further, are not an award that satisfies NMUSIC's award criterion -- that goes to awards like the Junos or the Polaris that get media coverage, not just every single music award that exists, and even a Juno or Polaris nomination would still require reliable source support.
But the only sourcing here comes entirely from her own public relations -- even the "MuchMusic" footnote is really just her own EPK bio rather than journalistic or documentary content created by a MuchMusic broadcast personality -- and even on a
ProQuest search for 14-year-old media coverage that wouldn't google, I just got a few glancing namechecks of her existence and absolutely nothing that would actually help salvage the article.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have more media coverage about her than I've been able to find.
Bearcat (
talk)
12:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. Bearcat ( talk) 12:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I've tried and can find song listings for her, but no chart listings. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:33, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Addictiv ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Everything (Addictiv album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a musician and an article about her album, neither of which are
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing
WP:NMUSIC. The BLP asserts that she had singles peak #48 and #59 in the Canadian Hot 100, but (a) those chart positions aren't sourced at all, and even a Billboard search fails to verify them, and (b) they aren't high enough chart positions to confer an "inherent" notability freebie in the absence of any
WP:GNG-worthy sourcing. The "Canadian Radio Music Awards", further, are not an award that satisfies NMUSIC's award criterion -- that goes to awards like the Junos or the Polaris that get media coverage, not just every single music award that exists, and even a Juno or Polaris nomination would still require reliable source support.
But the only sourcing here comes entirely from her own public relations -- even the "MuchMusic" footnote is really just her own EPK bio rather than journalistic or documentary content created by a MuchMusic broadcast personality -- and even on a
ProQuest search for 14-year-old media coverage that wouldn't google, I just got a few glancing namechecks of her existence and absolutely nothing that would actually help salvage the article.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have more media coverage about her than I've been able to find.
Bearcat (
talk)
12:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. Bearcat ( talk) 12:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I've tried and can find song listings for her, but no chart listings. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:33, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.