The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fictional race from D&D. Significant within some campaign settings, but no evidence of real-world notability. A couple of hits on Google Scholar, but one isn't a third-party source, the is a passing mention.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 18:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge to
List of avian humanoids#Fiction while it is not notable enough for an article, it does have at least enough mentions in RS to confirm their existence.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 11:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep or merge as above. As usual, deletion of information which can be merged elsewhere benefits nobody. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. While I suppose I wouldn't be completely opposed to Zxcvbnm's suggestion of giving it a mention on the
List of avian humanoids#Fiction, I really don't feel that the one passing comment in the source brought up by the nom is enough coverage that this is necessary. Searching for references beyond that turn up the usual collection of primary sources and mentions without any actual coverage.
Rorshacma (
talk) 17:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: If there's to be a merge or redirect, I support it being to the D&D list, and not to the article on avian humanoids - though maybe a mention there is appropriate anyway.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 17:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fictional race from D&D. Significant within some campaign settings, but no evidence of real-world notability. A couple of hits on Google Scholar, but one isn't a third-party source, the is a passing mention.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 18:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge to
List of avian humanoids#Fiction while it is not notable enough for an article, it does have at least enough mentions in RS to confirm their existence.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 11:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep or merge as above. As usual, deletion of information which can be merged elsewhere benefits nobody. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. While I suppose I wouldn't be completely opposed to Zxcvbnm's suggestion of giving it a mention on the
List of avian humanoids#Fiction, I really don't feel that the one passing comment in the source brought up by the nom is enough coverage that this is necessary. Searching for references beyond that turn up the usual collection of primary sources and mentions without any actual coverage.
Rorshacma (
talk) 17:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: If there's to be a merge or redirect, I support it being to the D&D list, and not to the article on avian humanoids - though maybe a mention there is appropriate anyway.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 17:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.