The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doing a Google search yields very limited coverage and the sources in the article currently are just from official charts, no independent coverage.
Andise1 (
talk)
08:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. An act with a number 2 hit in the main chart of an important music market, and a featured appearance on a further top 5 hit, is overwhelmingly likely to be notable. That they have not been Elgarised by the post-Blair/Cameron "new establishment" does not mean we should not cover them just as much as we cover Elgarised rock. For a significant audience, they are very notable indeed, and we cannot discount and dismiss that audience.
RobinCarmody (
talk)
16:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
delete sure they charted, but that's not enough on it's own for
WP:GNG to be met and there doesn't seem to be any in-depth references that would get them there. I'm on the weak delete side though because they did chart, but it would probably be better to delete the article for now anyway per
WP:TOOSOON. For all we know they could be a one or two hit wonder. In the mean time "A1 x J1 charted", which is 99% of article currently, is extremely
WP:MILL and not encyclopedic. --
Adamant1 (
talk)
04:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets
WP:MUSICBIO, as of writing the article has had over 4,700 views in the past month and I just heard their single "Coming for You" on daytime
BBC Radio 1 today so its likely the artist will receive more coverage in the future.
NemesisAT (
talk)
18:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
There are plenty of people accessing and reading this article so I just don't see how deleting it now would improve the encyclopedia especially if it gets recreated in the future - that is just creating additional work for editors and discouraing improvement of the article (folks are much more likely to improve the article if it already exists).
NemesisAT (
talk)
15:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doing a Google search yields very limited coverage and the sources in the article currently are just from official charts, no independent coverage.
Andise1 (
talk)
08:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. An act with a number 2 hit in the main chart of an important music market, and a featured appearance on a further top 5 hit, is overwhelmingly likely to be notable. That they have not been Elgarised by the post-Blair/Cameron "new establishment" does not mean we should not cover them just as much as we cover Elgarised rock. For a significant audience, they are very notable indeed, and we cannot discount and dismiss that audience.
RobinCarmody (
talk)
16:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
delete sure they charted, but that's not enough on it's own for
WP:GNG to be met and there doesn't seem to be any in-depth references that would get them there. I'm on the weak delete side though because they did chart, but it would probably be better to delete the article for now anyway per
WP:TOOSOON. For all we know they could be a one or two hit wonder. In the mean time "A1 x J1 charted", which is 99% of article currently, is extremely
WP:MILL and not encyclopedic. --
Adamant1 (
talk)
04:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets
WP:MUSICBIO, as of writing the article has had over 4,700 views in the past month and I just heard their single "Coming for You" on daytime
BBC Radio 1 today so its likely the artist will receive more coverage in the future.
NemesisAT (
talk)
18:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
There are plenty of people accessing and reading this article so I just don't see how deleting it now would improve the encyclopedia especially if it gets recreated in the future - that is just creating additional work for editors and discouraing improvement of the article (folks are much more likely to improve the article if it already exists).
NemesisAT (
talk)
15:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.