The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
essentially promotional, the work of a paid editor DGG (
talk ) 19:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. Notable, I'd say, although the article should really include details of the company's recent £7.8 million fine for failing to protect people with gambling problems (
[1]). --
Michig (
talk) 20:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge into
888.com: If the promotional stuff were trimmed, there would not be enough content to justify a separate article. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
888 Holdings; not independently notable. No need for a merge, as the target article would not be improved by this content. Ping @
ViperSnake151,
Clarityfiend, and
Piotrus: to see if they would consider a redirect.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 03:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)reply
It would be cleaner outcome. If there's a desire to merge anything, it can be picked up from the article history.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 04:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge as per previous editors
Chetsford (
talk) 19:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge agree with everyone else. I would close this, but I can't remember the "Please merge this article" template.
L3X1(distænt write) 02:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
essentially promotional, the work of a paid editor DGG (
talk ) 19:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. Notable, I'd say, although the article should really include details of the company's recent £7.8 million fine for failing to protect people with gambling problems (
[1]). --
Michig (
talk) 20:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge into
888.com: If the promotional stuff were trimmed, there would not be enough content to justify a separate article. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
888 Holdings; not independently notable. No need for a merge, as the target article would not be improved by this content. Ping @
ViperSnake151,
Clarityfiend, and
Piotrus: to see if they would consider a redirect.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 03:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)reply
It would be cleaner outcome. If there's a desire to merge anything, it can be picked up from the article history.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 04:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge as per previous editors
Chetsford (
talk) 19:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge agree with everyone else. I would close this, but I can't remember the "Please merge this article" template.
L3X1(distænt write) 02:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.