- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Barkeep49 ( talk) 03:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 5:30 Saturday Morning ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
completely unsourced stub article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. -- Puddleglum 2.0( How's my driving?) 15:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Puddleglum 2.0( How's my driving?) 15:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The album received reviews from
The A.V. Club,
Billboard,
AllMusic, and others:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]. This meets
WP:NALBUM.
MarkZusab (
talk)
20:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Hi MarkZusab! (and Caro7200, as you're vote is based off of this.) Hope you're staying well. If we're going to go by NALBUM, shouldn't this article's content be merged/redirected to the artist's article? I'm looking specifically at the part where it says that if the article is unlikely to go beyond stub, it should be merged to the artist's article if it exists. I look forward to your reply, -- puddleglum 2.0 21:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Puddleglum2.0. Looking at the sources that MarkZusab provided, as well as ones that another Google search returned, I do think that "there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." It's a stub right now, and it may only become a short article, but an editor could "reasonably" expand it. As with many Wikipedia policies, it's all in the interpretation. This may be Lennon's only album where that's possible (but so far it's her only album with its own article). Caro7200 ( talk) 22:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per MarkZusab, also a Nashville Scene article. Caro7200 ( talk) 21:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: there's a mini-review in Spin, too [5]. Richard3120 ( talk) 23:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Per MarkZusab. Sources presented above make the article good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 05:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Barkeep49 ( talk) 03:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 5:30 Saturday Morning ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
completely unsourced stub article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. -- Puddleglum 2.0( How's my driving?) 15:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Puddleglum 2.0( How's my driving?) 15:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The album received reviews from
The A.V. Club,
Billboard,
AllMusic, and others:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]. This meets
WP:NALBUM.
MarkZusab (
talk)
20:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Hi MarkZusab! (and Caro7200, as you're vote is based off of this.) Hope you're staying well. If we're going to go by NALBUM, shouldn't this article's content be merged/redirected to the artist's article? I'm looking specifically at the part where it says that if the article is unlikely to go beyond stub, it should be merged to the artist's article if it exists. I look forward to your reply, -- puddleglum 2.0 21:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Puddleglum2.0. Looking at the sources that MarkZusab provided, as well as ones that another Google search returned, I do think that "there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." It's a stub right now, and it may only become a short article, but an editor could "reasonably" expand it. As with many Wikipedia policies, it's all in the interpretation. This may be Lennon's only album where that's possible (but so far it's her only album with its own article). Caro7200 ( talk) 22:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per MarkZusab, also a Nashville Scene article. Caro7200 ( talk) 21:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: there's a mini-review in Spin, too [5]. Richard3120 ( talk) 23:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Per MarkZusab. Sources presented above make the article good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 05:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.