- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Thank you to Gongshow for finding sources and tidying the article. -- Kinu t/ c 19:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
3rd Faze
- 3rd Faze ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability, as tagged five years ago. Only source provided is an AllMusic profile. No substantive coverage found in WP:RS. Kinu t/ c 05:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 09:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 09:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Coverage includes a New York Times review [1], a lengthy Birmingham News piece [2], a brief Allmusic bio [3] and review [4], and an A.V. Club write-up which described their album one of the "least essential" of 2001 [5]. There is enough material in my view to satisfy WP:MUSIC. Gongshow talk 16:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 16:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:MUSIC, criteria 4. More sources have been added since the nomination and the nominator themselves indicated they'd be willing to widraw the nomination. -- Taketa ( talk) 17:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Thank you to Gongshow for finding sources and tidying the article. -- Kinu t/ c 19:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
3rd Faze
- 3rd Faze ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability, as tagged five years ago. Only source provided is an AllMusic profile. No substantive coverage found in WP:RS. Kinu t/ c 05:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 09:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 09:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Coverage includes a New York Times review [1], a lengthy Birmingham News piece [2], a brief Allmusic bio [3] and review [4], and an A.V. Club write-up which described their album one of the "least essential" of 2001 [5]. There is enough material in my view to satisfy WP:MUSIC. Gongshow talk 16:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 16:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:MUSIC, criteria 4. More sources have been added since the nomination and the nominator themselves indicated they'd be willing to widraw the nomination. -- Taketa ( talk) 17:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.