Koei didn't confirm Lu Bu for DW7 right? I went to the DW7 website, Koei's website, it's facebook, it's youtube, and the Koei Warriors website, no source saying anything on Lu Bu being in DW7, am I correct? 74.69.189.75 ( talk) 01:54, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The box is for the original dates only. UK airdates aren't the first. Please stop adding them. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 19:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Wikiepedia isn't a TV Guide. Stop adding superfluous airdates. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 14:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I repeat, Wikipedia is not a TV Guide. Like Melicans told you below, what's happening with the show in the UK is irrelevant. Stop adding the dates. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 14:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Original: take the hint already. US airdates are the originals. You're just trying to add these because you think they're interesting. Knock it off. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 14:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter. Just because other shows used a messed up format doesn't mean you get to repeat the error here. Original airdates only. Go to a TV Guide site if you want the other countries. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 15:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'm honestly getting tired of this nonsense. Stop undoing and pay attention. UK airdates are not the first, and therefore are not the originals. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 15:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Read the name of the field you keep adding them to. origairdate = Original. We only list one set of dates, the first. What you're doing is listing superfluous dates. Stop. The only dates listed with any show are the first ones, which aren't the UK dates you keep adding. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 16:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment on the bottom of my page, not the top. I'm tired of moving your posts. The original air date is the only one we list. Read Template_talk:Episode_list#Usage. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 16:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- My patience has worn thin with your continuous reverting. Do you understand why only one date is listed now? — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 16:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding that the series will soon be airing in the UK. It is inconsequential to the article, and it's placement in the opening is not necessary. Wikipedia is not a TV Guide. MelicansMatkin 21:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why not, I just need to inform viewers, no need to delete it? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yinyanglightningthrash (
talk •
contribs) 19:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- For several reasons. As I've already said, Wikipedia is not a TV Guide - readers don't need to know when the dub will air in Britain, that's what the infobox is for. It has no relevence anywhere in the article either. If you check, not even the original airdate for the first Japanese broadcast is mentioned. If it goes anywhere in the article it should be put in the infobox, but only when an actual airdate has been released. MelicansMatkin 00:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Ok then I wont add it, just please dont delete the part where it says "TBA- late 2007" in the infobox —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinyanglightningthrash ( talk • contribs) 08:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I won't - that's what the infobox is for after all. ;-) MelicansMatkin 11:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
The coming soon section has been merged. Instead of reverting mindlessly, pay attention to why you're being reverted. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 09:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing.
Alientraveller 17:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot 08:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Stop changing the date. It's listed on every major site as June 30. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 16:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I did it for the same reason as everyone else.
And now it it is one section. Are you happy? (Sheesh) Thanks, Codelyoko193 Talk 12:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:048-1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you made some edits regarding release dates of movies and thought I'd point you to the WikiProject Films' style guidelines on release dates, since parts of your edits don't conform with that. Just so you'll know in the future ;) -- Fritz S. ( Talk) 07:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't check all your edits, but on Nancy Drew (2007 film) for example you added the German release date, and the guidelines also say using flag icons should be avoided... -- Fritz S. ( Talk) 12:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
On 22 November, you tagged Cartoon Network Magazine with {{ rfd}}. However, you added your nomination rationale to the article page instead of at WP:RFD. If you still wish to see this redirect deleted, please properly complete the second step of the nomination instructions. If you do not list it in a reasonable time, I will assume you no longer wish to see it deleted and will remove the tag. Let me know if you have any questions or need assistance. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 16:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's still incorrect. As I said above, "you added your nomination rationale to the article page instead of at
WP:RFD". Please re-read step two of the instructions. In particular, the first line which has the link "THIS LINK" in big text. That link is where you need to list it; not on the article. Thanks. --
JLaTondre 13:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll try to make it clearer. The nomination statement doesn't go on the article; it goes on a WP:RFD page. Go to WP:RFD#How_to_list_a_redirect_for_deletion. There is a step I and a step II. You need to follow step II (the darker yellow) as specified. It tells you were to add it (the big "THIS LINK"). Click that link and add the nomination there. If that's still not clear, let me know. -- JLaTondre 15:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much Yinyang for the barnstar. I'm not much of a content contributor, but I do try to keep things looking clean and professional around the place. The article is about due for a rewrite, though I'll wait until well after series two concludes to do that. BTW, interesting username! — Huntster ( t • @ • c) 20:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
It's a she, and she was in Dynasty Warriors 6: Empires. Please stop notating that she is new to the series. If you have a problem with the character page, fix it there. But don't add false information here. That page became highly unreliable and confusing once Koei began removing characters from the Dynasty Warriors 5 cast. IdSdI ( talk) 17:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Oops... slight mistake on the gender. Anyways, yeah, she was in empires, but she was not a playable character. Cai Wenji was one of the people you helped in some missions; you couldn't play as her. The confirmed characters on the Dynasty Warriors 7 page are the ones that are playable. Yinyanglightningthrash ( talk) 18:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- I still don't know how they know they are playable. I think it is partially speculation based on them being in the game (meaning they are likely playable). Anyway, that doesn't matter because she later became playable in DW: Strikeforce 2. IdSdI ( talk) 21:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
I do get wound up to easily but that isn't exactly my fault :S.. And thank you for the help with the edits (however the paragraph you changed with that punctuation was something i didn't write in the first place ;) lol ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joetri10 ( talk • contribs) 23:14, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Koei didn't confirm Lu Bu for DW7 right? I went to the DW7 website, Koei's website, it's facebook, it's youtube, and the Koei Warriors website, no source saying anything on Lu Bu being in DW7, am I correct? 74.69.189.75 ( talk) 01:54, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The box is for the original dates only. UK airdates aren't the first. Please stop adding them. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 19:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Wikiepedia isn't a TV Guide. Stop adding superfluous airdates. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 14:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I repeat, Wikipedia is not a TV Guide. Like Melicans told you below, what's happening with the show in the UK is irrelevant. Stop adding the dates. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 14:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Original: take the hint already. US airdates are the originals. You're just trying to add these because you think they're interesting. Knock it off. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 14:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter. Just because other shows used a messed up format doesn't mean you get to repeat the error here. Original airdates only. Go to a TV Guide site if you want the other countries. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 15:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'm honestly getting tired of this nonsense. Stop undoing and pay attention. UK airdates are not the first, and therefore are not the originals. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 15:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Read the name of the field you keep adding them to. origairdate = Original. We only list one set of dates, the first. What you're doing is listing superfluous dates. Stop. The only dates listed with any show are the first ones, which aren't the UK dates you keep adding. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 16:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment on the bottom of my page, not the top. I'm tired of moving your posts. The original air date is the only one we list. Read Template_talk:Episode_list#Usage. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 16:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- My patience has worn thin with your continuous reverting. Do you understand why only one date is listed now? — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 16:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding that the series will soon be airing in the UK. It is inconsequential to the article, and it's placement in the opening is not necessary. Wikipedia is not a TV Guide. MelicansMatkin 21:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why not, I just need to inform viewers, no need to delete it? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yinyanglightningthrash (
talk •
contribs) 19:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- For several reasons. As I've already said, Wikipedia is not a TV Guide - readers don't need to know when the dub will air in Britain, that's what the infobox is for. It has no relevence anywhere in the article either. If you check, not even the original airdate for the first Japanese broadcast is mentioned. If it goes anywhere in the article it should be put in the infobox, but only when an actual airdate has been released. MelicansMatkin 00:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Ok then I wont add it, just please dont delete the part where it says "TBA- late 2007" in the infobox —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinyanglightningthrash ( talk • contribs) 08:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I won't - that's what the infobox is for after all. ;-) MelicansMatkin 11:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
The coming soon section has been merged. Instead of reverting mindlessly, pay attention to why you're being reverted. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 09:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing.
Alientraveller 17:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot 08:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Stop changing the date. It's listed on every major site as June 30. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 16:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I did it for the same reason as everyone else.
And now it it is one section. Are you happy? (Sheesh) Thanks, Codelyoko193 Talk 12:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:048-1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you made some edits regarding release dates of movies and thought I'd point you to the WikiProject Films' style guidelines on release dates, since parts of your edits don't conform with that. Just so you'll know in the future ;) -- Fritz S. ( Talk) 07:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't check all your edits, but on Nancy Drew (2007 film) for example you added the German release date, and the guidelines also say using flag icons should be avoided... -- Fritz S. ( Talk) 12:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
On 22 November, you tagged Cartoon Network Magazine with {{ rfd}}. However, you added your nomination rationale to the article page instead of at WP:RFD. If you still wish to see this redirect deleted, please properly complete the second step of the nomination instructions. If you do not list it in a reasonable time, I will assume you no longer wish to see it deleted and will remove the tag. Let me know if you have any questions or need assistance. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 16:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's still incorrect. As I said above, "you added your nomination rationale to the article page instead of at
WP:RFD". Please re-read step two of the instructions. In particular, the first line which has the link "THIS LINK" in big text. That link is where you need to list it; not on the article. Thanks. --
JLaTondre 13:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll try to make it clearer. The nomination statement doesn't go on the article; it goes on a WP:RFD page. Go to WP:RFD#How_to_list_a_redirect_for_deletion. There is a step I and a step II. You need to follow step II (the darker yellow) as specified. It tells you were to add it (the big "THIS LINK"). Click that link and add the nomination there. If that's still not clear, let me know. -- JLaTondre 15:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much Yinyang for the barnstar. I'm not much of a content contributor, but I do try to keep things looking clean and professional around the place. The article is about due for a rewrite, though I'll wait until well after series two concludes to do that. BTW, interesting username! — Huntster ( t • @ • c) 20:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
It's a she, and she was in Dynasty Warriors 6: Empires. Please stop notating that she is new to the series. If you have a problem with the character page, fix it there. But don't add false information here. That page became highly unreliable and confusing once Koei began removing characters from the Dynasty Warriors 5 cast. IdSdI ( talk) 17:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Oops... slight mistake on the gender. Anyways, yeah, she was in empires, but she was not a playable character. Cai Wenji was one of the people you helped in some missions; you couldn't play as her. The confirmed characters on the Dynasty Warriors 7 page are the ones that are playable. Yinyanglightningthrash ( talk) 18:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- I still don't know how they know they are playable. I think it is partially speculation based on them being in the game (meaning they are likely playable). Anyway, that doesn't matter because she later became playable in DW: Strikeforce 2. IdSdI ( talk) 21:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
I do get wound up to easily but that isn't exactly my fault :S.. And thank you for the help with the edits (however the paragraph you changed with that punctuation was something i didn't write in the first place ;) lol ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joetri10 ( talk • contribs) 23:14, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)