Welcome!

Hello, Vindheim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Khoikhoi 19:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi, I took the chance of including you in our category, based on your recent edit indication an intimate knowledge of Heimdal (Tillerbyen). Feel free to remove the category tag I placed on your user page if you want too, of course. Welcome! -- Wernher 23:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Yes indeed I am a Norwegian and I libe near heimdal in the city of Trondheim.

Check my Norwegian wikipage

-- Vindheim 23:36, 24 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the message out of the blue. After about six months of out of the blue messages i finally figured out that Werners talk link was piping to my talk page. The fact that Wernher was the only other user to comment on your page has helped me to finally figure out this mystery. Thanks for your help ;-) David D. (Talk) 23:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC) reply

glad to be of assistance

-- Vindheim 14:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Welcome to wikipedia! Regarding Mustafa Barzani article vandalism.

A proper way do fix vandalism is as follows:

• click "history"
• Look at several most recent contributions by suspicious authors (IP addresses or editors whose names are red links). It is not uncommon that vandals flock and some innocent inexperienced editors fix manually 1-2 most evident corruptions of the text.
• Click at the last non-corrupted version
• Click "edit" and save this version
• Optionally reinsert edits by following editors who didn't notice or incorrectly fixed vandalism (like I just did with Mustafa Barzani).

Thank you for your contributions to wikipedia. Mukadderat 19:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC) reply

The vandalism I removed had replaced the whole article with a "funny" påicture. I repalced the text from the previous version, I believe. -- Vindheim 10:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi, Vindheim. Thank you for your comment on the Kurdish people. I will appreciate if you help by that matter. Most of the authorative existing sources support us including wikipedia policy. X ebat Talk + 01:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC) reply

|}

Thanks for uploading Image:Mustafa barzani.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Hetar 05:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Please do not upload copyrighted images to commons -- Cat out 19:25, 5 May 2006 (UTC) reply

The images I have uploaded have had their copyright situation checked. Some are from the KRG websise. I contacted the webmaster, asking specifically if the image scould be used in Wikipedia, and received the reply "if you mention the source then you can publish any pictures of krg.org website". I a have also uploaded a map of Iraqi kurdistan, which is from the ICG website, [ [1]] which states:

Copyright notice.

Unless otherwise specifically stated, the material on this site was created, authored, and/or prepared by the International Crisis Group ("Crisis Group", formerly "ICG") and Crisis Group is the copyright owner of such materials. Unless otherwise specifically stated, no claim to copyright is being asserted by Crisis Group and material on this website may be freely used as in the public domain. Crisis Group encourages you to copy and distribute the Crisis Group copyrighted materials and documents found on this site (the “Crisis Group Materials”). In that regard, so long as you credit Crisis Group as the source and so long as you comply with the other terms and conditions in this notice, no permission is required to use, reproduce, copy, modify or download any of the Crisis Group Materials.

So what is the problem ?-- Vindheim 20:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Please visit Triumf Internett. Is it notable enough for an article? Moriori 04:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Personal attacks and imputations of personal motives are unhelpful. We are trying to cooperate on an encyclopedia, not make each other's lives unpleasant. Please consider this. Statements like "It looks as if you are ...", "...because you disagree...", "This article is not your personal playground" and threats like "Do that again and I'll..." are personal judgments and attacks. All of these occur in but a single posting of yours ( Talk:Rudolf Steiner). Hgilbert 00:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Perhaps you can clarify what you see as a solution to the neutrality issue. I have offered two possibilities and you haven't responded to this. At the moment it appears that what you consider "neutral" is only including one point of view. Hgilbert 12:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I have reformulated some of the disputed passages and removed the tag. -- Vindheim 19:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I appreciate that you would like to have a full picture of the Theosophical Society's point of view included in this article. It is a complex issue, however, and Wikipedia articles are meant to be relatively concise, with complex issues dealt with in summary and sub-articles allowing for fuller treatments. I don't believe we can do justice to both parties' points of view in this article; it is a relatively small part of Steiner's complete biography, and the part of his life between 1912-1925 is currently underrepresented. I hope that you can see the sense of having a full treatment in the sub-article, and a non-contentious summary in the main article, with neither point of view as to the blame for the break presented - simply that there was a break over the issues.

Note that if a fuller treatment returns, with the T.S. POV represented, Besant's false claims about Steiner's relationship to Jesuitism, which were printed in T.S. journals at the time and caused a great disturbance to Steiner himself, will also have to be presented. Then we're back to a situation where the section is too long for the general article. Hgilbert 20:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Steiner's exclusion of a religious group (The Order of the Star in the East) from the German Section was a blatant and intended breach of TS bylaws. The leadership of the TS was therefore forced to withdraw the charter of the German Section. Omitting this fact is grossly misleading, adding to the anthroposphical bias in the rest of article. -- Vindheim 10:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Not sure why you keep trying to qualify Theosophy in ascended master. Blavatski invented Theosophy and coined the word. There is no need to qualify it with "neo-" or "Madame Blavatski's". — Hanuman Das 12:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I put a note on the talk page for ascended master. My point being that Blavatsky's masters were not "ascended", but very much human. The "ascended" part came in later versions of theosophy. -- Vindheim 12:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC) reply

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rudolf Steiner, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rudolf Steiner. For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

I appreciate your adding the comment about there being no evidence of racism in anthroposophical institutions, but there have been issues (such as the ethnography class in Dutch Waldorf schools, and the views of some individual anthroposophists - a few of whom have been thrown out of the Society over this) where questions have been raised, and I don't think there is any way of verifying what I too hope is true. Perhaps you can cite some source that supports a similar statement, however - I will also look for something of the kind. The Dutch government investigation of the ethnography issue pointed out that there was no suspicion whatsoever of racism in the Dutch schools, for example. Hgilbert 15:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Why did you revert me? Iraqi Kurdistan as it is is a part of the federal body of Iraq. We certainly do not put {{ North America}} on Michigan. -- Cat out 14:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply

I see no reason not to define Michigan as part of America, and - even more to the point - I see good reason to define Quebec as a distinct political entity within North America and not only as part of Canada. -- Vindheim 16:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply

How about individual counties, cities, and other regions? It is highly redundent to do so and against established concensus on the usage of these templates.

You are welcome to define Iraqi kurdistan as a part of Middle east and asia or Michigan as a part of North America but you can do that with a simple sentence without using the template.

If it is not linked on the table it really should not be used.

-- Cat out 16:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Cool Cat is right you know. Those templates are only for country related articles. Perhaps you should discuss this on the talk page of the article. Please do not revert valid changes made by other editors, and if you wish to make major changes to the article, discuss them on the talk pages beforehand. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 16:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Cat out 16:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Cat out 16:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Cat out 16:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ascended master, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. - Richfife 18:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi, I have sent the other members involved in the dispute at Ascended master an email to begin Mediation. As you have chosen either not to provide an email address or not to receive email from other users, I was not able to email you. Please send me an email using Special:Emailuser/PinchasC listing your view of the disagreements which have been taking place. Once everyone has responded, mediation will begin by email. -- PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC) reply

There is a current request for arbitration relating to the articles Waldorf education, Anthroposophy, Rudolf Steiner and Rudolf Steiner's views on race and ethnicity. Hgilbert 01:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi Vindheim, I noticed your edit to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration and I wanted to let you know that only Arbitrators (that is, users appointed by User:Jimbo Wales to the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee) are allowed to vote on cases listed on RFAR. It's really not a huge deal, I've already reverted it, but I wanted to let you know so you would know for future reference. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Essjay (Talk) 05:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 01:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply

The article Ascended master, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup. If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page. You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

The above entitled arbitration case has closed, and the final decision has been issued at the above link. Waldorf education, Rudolf Steiner, Anthroposophy and the extended family of related articles such as Social Threefolding are placed on article probation. Editors of these articles are expected to remove all original research and other unverifiable information, including all controversial information sourced in Anthroposophy related publications. It is anticipated that this process may result in deletion or merger of some articles due to failure of verification by third party peer reviewed sources. If it is found, upon review by the Arbitration Committee, that any of the principals in this arbitration continue to edit in an inappropriate and disruptive way editing restrictions may be imposed. Review may be at the initiative of any member of the Arbitration Committee on their own motion or upon petition by any user to them.

For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 23:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC) reply

I have reopened the arbitration case concerning this article for review Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education/Review. Fred Bauder 15:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC) reply

The reviewing of the case has finished. You may view the decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education/Review.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 18:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Greetings,

I was hoping I could get some input from you, about the proposed mergerof Wikipedia:WikiProject Terrorism and counter-terrorism with Wikiproject:Terrorism. It seems there's a lot of overlap between the two projects, and if we spent a few days merging the lists of articles, sharing ideas and collaborating on improving the same articles which both projects are focused on improving...we could really make some headway. Whether you're in favour, or against, the idea of a merger - I'd appreciate some feedback regardless. Much thanks. Sherurcij ^{( Speaker for the Dead)} 21:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I agree with you completely that "it is essential that the main academic consenus views be presented fairly" regarding Theosophy. But such subjective statements such as the "main academic consenus" is thus and such, without giving a source, makes the statement "Original Research" WP:OR. Arion ( talk) 20:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello; I reverted your edits in Kurdistan workers party. I did so, because adding unsourced info in such controversial articles should be avoided. Erasing the sourced info is another no-no. Plus I noticed that your version described " Kurdistan workers party" as an "armed resistance", which is at least as POV as Terrorist (One's terorist is other one's freedom fighter). So it didn't qualify for WP:WTA As long as you take these points into considiration, your edits are always welcome, and your contribution is appriciated. Regards, Kerem Özcan ( talk) 12:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello again;

I am not willing by any-means to get in an edit war, and I am not going to do that. I just want to mention that I am by no means a nationalist or anything near that. I condemn the oppression of Kurdish population and culture in Turkey, and also recognize the right of the self determination of Kurdish people (If that means a seperate Kurdistan, so be it). However you should know that Öcalan's PKK, or Kurdistan Workers Party, is by no means a mythical-freedomfighting organization like Che's guerillas. They have been involved in drug and human trafficing, extorsion, attacks against civilians and Kurdish bussinessmen who don't support them, you name it... Of course this doesn't whitewash the oppression by the Turkish government or the army, but also no need to praise PKK.

Also as you can see from the last elections, the Kurdish party that is allegedly connected with PKK, didn't get the support it expected. Many Kurds voted in favor of AKP, for a diplomatic solution rather than guerilla fighting.

I'll revert your version, which btw apart from typos, has many WP:OR problems, once more. As I said before, I'll by no means get into an edit war, but I think you should think about it in the light of what I've written.

Regards, Kerem Özcan ( talk) 11:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply

I have reverted your edits in [[:Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons}}, which incuded deletion of sourced material, which could be considered vandalism, and addition of unsourced material derogatory to Mr. Barzani's family, which is covered by Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. -- Donald Albury 16:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply

You mean PKK article in Indonesian wikipedia? I hv edited it anyway, removed the "terorist". Thanks for reminding Mimihitam ( talk) 13:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply

	The Terrorism WikiProject April 2008 Newsletter
News 1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack was made a Featured Article Omar Khadr has an ongoing peer review as it begins the slow crawl towards Featured Article status Trials have begun this month in the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot, Benbrika affair and 2006 Toronto terrorism case, each article could use a good vetting, and the articles on specific alleged terrorists are desperately in need of some clean-up. Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein had his case overturned by the Iraqi courts and was ordered released, although the US military says they will not release him. China announced that they had disrupted a plot targeting the 2008 Summer Olympics, while detractors claim it was fabricated. The bail hearing for Abdullah Khadr, fighting extradition to the United States, is scheduled for April 29 Former Turkish Member of Parliament Leyla Zana is sentenced to two years imprisonment for praising Abdullah Öcalan. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guantanamo detainees missing from the official list needs votes on whether or not it should be kept on Wikipedia.
Archives • Discussion

Sherurcij ^{( Speaker for the Dead)} 05:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Let me explain you. Word of Kurdistan is only use by USA and Kurds to describe a region in Mesopotamia. There isn't a country called Kurdistan and that flag is only belongs to Iraqi Kurdistan. Turkey, Syria and Iran are not part of Kurdistan. Turks and Kurds are not enemies. The PKK's goal has been to create an independent, socialist Kurdish state called Kurdistan in Mesopotamia. Are you a member of PKK??? Because you are trying to divide Turkey. Please stop doing this and never use that flag anywhere except Iraqi Kurdistan. Izmir lee ( talk) 15:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

You are accusing me to persecute Kurds! I have lots of Kurdish friends. They aren't bad people. I only against PKK and terrorist Kurds. Because they want to divide Turkey and declare independent Kurdistan! Izmir lee ( talk) 15:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

You also seem to be against kurds affirming their identity as kurds. Your repeated changes to the page Kurdish people have nothing to do with preventing terrorism, but seem to have a lot to do with affirming Turkish identity. I will request arbitration.-- Vindheim ( talk) 15:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Turks and Kurds have been living together for hundred years. We won't separate our countries! We will live in Turkey brotherly like today! There is no need to Kurdistan! Don't forget this! Izmir lee ( talk) 15:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Some people might say that the treatment of Kurds by Turks is not very friendly as of today (understatement). Anyway even the PKK opts for feredalism and not separatism these days. -- Vindheim ( talk) 15:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Look here! [2], [3] Recent news about Turkish soldiers who killed by PKK on 10th of June 2008! Is it opting federalism?!? Izmir lee ( talk) 16:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

I did not claim the PKK have renounced armed struggle. I claimed their official goal is no longer an independent Kurdish state. -- Vindheim ( talk) 17:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC). reply

The English Wikinews is going to be organizing an interview with the former Norwegian Culture Minister Åse Kleveland. She was also the head of the Swedish Film Institute and is now the chairwoman of the Norwegian Humanist Association. I am asking Wikipedians from all of the Scandinavian languages to contribute questions to her upcoming interview with Wikinews in Oslo. The page is here; please leave questions there and comments to me either on my en.wikinews talk page or my en.wikipedia talk page. Thank you very much! Mike H. Fierce! 02:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Please show me which part of this article you based your claim that most of the 37,000 deaths can be attributed to Turks. -- Adoniscik^{( t, c)} 16:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Sorry to be quick on the trigger! I looked at page 420 of McDowall (your citation) and it still contradicts your assertion: "During the next decade [the PKK's] activities resulted in the death of an estimated 11,000 people, and showed no signs of abating." I presume you calculated the difference between 37,000 and 11,000 and concluded that Turks did most of the killing? If this is the reasoning, it is fallacious because the precise period over which the casualties were calculated is not given, and we do not know whether the sources obtained their statistics from the same source (in order to compare apples to apples). If your reasoning is different, please do explain. In any case, we can work in that reference. Thanks. -- Adoniscik^{( t, c)} 16:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC) reply

I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 11:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Could you include the page number(s) for your latest citation in the Rudolf Steiner article, please? Thanks a bundle, and best wishes. Hgilbert ( talk) 11:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Emb logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- FairuseBot ( talk) 12:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Please see User_talk:Joyson_Noel#Mustafa_Barzani. Does this sound right to you?-- CreazySuit ( talk) 21:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Would it be possible for you to propose a few sentences with respect to the Sunni background of Al Qaeda, in perhaps the ideology section? Right now the Sunni identifier that you added (albeit sourced) to the lead has no support in the article body, as far as I can tell. Thanks. Switzpaw ( talk) 04:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply

As per wikipedia's policy the information that I have contributed on the Yezidi page is taken from a Yezidi community web site and referenced. There is not a word of original research. Are you a Yezidi? I am asking as you seem to be a Kurd and many Kurds are Yezidi. Please elaborate on what you have written to me. I have edited the Yezidi page to its previous status. Please can you suggest why the changes I had made were edited? Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 14:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Sorry for the blunt question about your identity.

Thanks, unorthodox and unreliable source, a Pinkham I have been told. To me as an Indian the information seems to be easy to believe. I can relate to and find familiar a few Yezidi practices, particularly those which are non-semitic. The civilisation which is now identified as Indian had foot prints from the eastern Pacific shore, into Mongolia and Japan, see Garud and Swastik and into the middle and near east, statues of a man with an elephant head ( Ganesha??) have been found in Central America and Europe.

Mithraism the religion of sun worshippers could be related to Mitra one of the names of the sun god the name is invoked in the first pose of Surya Namaskara, please read the link.

I have written to a Yezidi from Egypt wishing to know more about his religion and practices, but perhaps because of his discomfort with English he has not been very enthusiastic about the communication.

The temple at Lalish looks very much like an Indian temple.

What do you infer from your experience with the Yezidi's and Indians? You have been exposed to both of them.

Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 06:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Welcome back from Wiki Project Terrorism! I'm Katarighe, a Wikipedian member since 2009. I'm currently the successor of Sherurcij in September because, he has not edited Wikipedia using this account for a considerable amount of time since May 2010. We are trying to renovate the new WP page this fall 2011 and we look forward this month whats next. If you are interested, start the renovation with us and new awards on contributing terrorism are coming soon. The WP terrorism newsletter begins January 2012. See you on October for the updates on WP terrorism. I will send this message next month about the updates. Good Luck.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Terrorism at 22:42, 25 September 2011 (UTC). reply

please discuss on Talk as per WP:BRD. I have opened a thread: Talk:Séralini_affair#New_content_objecting_to_retraction. Jytdog ( talk) 12:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, Vindheim. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply