The result was merge to List of Guantanamo Bay detainees. Even though the list may be acceptable with regard to WP:OR, the introductory prose needs heavy sourcing if it is to be included in the merger. Sandstein ( talk) 06:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The only source that lends any weight to the fact that some detainees were left off of this list is Wikipedia itself.
However, the lack of outside sources that reference the article topic in its entirety is disturbing. I'm not suggesting that such an absence is a sign that the article need to be deleted on face. but it is a sign that caution should be used. Protonk ( talk) 07:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of Guantanamo Bay detainees. Even though the list may be acceptable with regard to WP:OR, the introductory prose needs heavy sourcing if it is to be included in the merger. Sandstein ( talk) 06:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The only source that lends any weight to the fact that some detainees were left off of this list is Wikipedia itself.
However, the lack of outside sources that reference the article topic in its entirety is disturbing. I'm not suggesting that such an absence is a sign that the article need to be deleted on face. but it is a sign that caution should be used. Protonk ( talk) 07:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC) reply