Hi Universalrahu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Tito Dutta ( talk) 19:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kabali (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Universalrahu, it was specifically this edit where you removed a clarification request without fixing the problem that was raised. This is not constructive. We write articles for a global readership, and if a user doesn't understand what is being communicated and is asking for clarification, you should endeavor to clarify it. Please only revert edits when there is a legitimate reason to do so (vandalism, for instance) and provide a clear edit summary. And if an change you make is reverted, per WP:BRD you should open a discussion on the article's talk page or on the talk page of the user who made the reversion to seek consensus. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kabali (film), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diff: [1] You should read the template. This has nothing to do with sourcing. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Last warning about this. If you remove the maintenance template again without resolving the clarification issue, I'm going to interrupt your editing privileges. The content doesn't make sense in English. It lacks sufficient context for English-speakers to understand what you are saying. Either fix the problem or leave the template alone. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
This content was problematic as well and I had to flag that for cleanup too. Either fix it, or remove the section, but don't remove the cleanup template until you do one or the other, please. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
I've had to revert this because "massive blockbuster" fails our Neutral Point of View policy. Wikipedia is not a blog. We don't editorialize, advertise, or sensationalize. We present content in a fair and impartial tone. "Became a commercial success" would be closer, but you'd have to attribute that summary to a specific voice. There were other issues: "Largest opening" is vague. Surely an American film had the "largest opening". Do you mean "largest opening day in India"? Where's the source for that? Do you mean "largest opening in Chennai"? Where's the source for that? I didn't see anything in any of the sources that supported those claims. I see "a good opening". I see "the opening has been Grand" (which is vague and subjective), but nothing describing it as the "largest opening" of any specific kind. Also, I don't see anything supporting the 30 crore value you submitted. Lastly, thenewsrecorder.com is a blog, and we do not use blogs for references, since anyone can start a blog and print whatever he wants. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 08:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Veerappan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
At WP:IRC #wikipedia-en-help, I had advised a contributor to undo the edits, sign up, and make a new query to gain consensus on article talk. Please understand that fact while interacting with this edit further. This process has even started. Thanks. -- Gryllida ( talk) 11:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Universalrahu,
The Design Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation is currently seeking relatively newcomer Wikipedians for user studies about their experience with current editing tools and to test out some prototype editing tools. If you’re interested in helping to shape the future of editing on Wikipedia, we would love to have you participate! The study session will take approximately 30 minutes, maximum of 45 minutes.
The study will take place in the next couple weeks, and will require participants to have access to a webcam and microphone (or a laptop with built in cam & mic), with a quiet place to go for a research session. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org and include the following information:
Please let me know if you have any questions! Look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Daisy Chen
User Experience Researcher Dchen (WMF) ( talk) 01:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Spaceman
Spiff 13:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Spaceman Spiff 13:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, just an FYI that if you are being paid for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. See WP:PAID for more information. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2012 Dharmapuri violence, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. THis is your only warning, the next time you remove sourced content and reliable sources because it doesn't suit your POV, you will be blocked. — Spaceman Spiff 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
This comment you left on SpacemanSpiff's talk page is pure rubbish and I have responded accordingly. In case you don't get the ping or don't bother to check it, please stop wasting other editors' time with nonsense. Seriously, you're bringing up crap from 2009 when SpacemanSpiff was new? I assume that's what you're referring to since he hadn't edited that article since 2012. Nobody expects perfection from new editors, only a willingness to learn and to change when problems are pointed out. Similarly, nobody expects you to be perfect, only to be willing to learn and to change when problems are pointed out. And in case you want to get super anal about this, in the 27 July 2009 version of MOS:LEAD (which coincides with SpacemanSpiff's creation of the article), the instructions to avoid "acclaimed" had not yet been introduced, and wasn't added until 3 years later. So for all you know, the community didn't yet have a problem with that phrasing. Total waste of time. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Universalrahu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Santhanam (actor), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [3] Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi - I'm concerned about this new list that you've created. As a list composed mostly (presumably) of BLPs, I'd expect to see a reliable source for each and every individual on the list, confirming that they were introduced to cinema by Bharathiraja. I can't see any sourcing confirming that any of them were, and the first couple of articles I clicked on did not mention Bharathiraja anywhere in them. I'm going to draftify this article, to give you time to work on the sourcing - please also consider the article title before republishing, I'm not sure 'new faces' is formal enough for an encyclopedic list. Something like 'List of notable actors introduced to cinema by Bharathiraja' might be more appropriate. Best GirthSummit (blether) 12:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of new faces introduced by Bharathiraja, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
GirthSummit
(blether) 12:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
You are not verifying what the source says. Where ever I edit , I edit based on books and references from reputed universities. Please do not glorify castes and communities. Also read the sources carefully. Thanks
You need to check the amount of discussion I have made in talk pages. I kindly request you to go through talk pages, Also when ever I make a edit it based on university academic books and resources. so Please I have posted my comments on talk pages. request you to do the same.
Sangitha rani111 (
talk) 01:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
In Karnataka, where she was born there is no caste called Gounder. Its a caste called GOwda which she belongs to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetankcp ( talk • contribs) 06:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Universalrahu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of new faces introduced by Bharathiraja".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 10:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC).
-- RegentsPark ( comment) 12:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Paris Jayaraj, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk) 07:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
U r deleting everything created by some casteist director by simply saying POV and unreliable citation for everything. Many other people also watching the pages. I will report to adminstrator. 2409:4072:6C9F:42AA:2EE5:7BCE:F1B:2CB1 ( talk) 04:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 05:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
I am aware of Wikipedia policies. You first see Wikipedia:MOSFILMS. A news completely not connected with film has been included and that too from unreliable sources. See Reliable sources guidelines on Indian cinema Wikipedia:INCINE. If you are going to add news from unreliable sources not connected with the film. You will be reported to Administrators.-- Universalrahu ( talk) 05:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
U are only saying what you hate as unreliable. BBC, Indian express and times of india Tamil is not unreliable. 2409:4072:6C9F:42AA:3C60:AA0C:E631:AE6 ( talk) 06:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Spaceman
Spiff 06:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:Takku Mukku Tikku Thalam Fim Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi Universalrahu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Tito Dutta ( talk) 19:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kabali (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Universalrahu, it was specifically this edit where you removed a clarification request without fixing the problem that was raised. This is not constructive. We write articles for a global readership, and if a user doesn't understand what is being communicated and is asking for clarification, you should endeavor to clarify it. Please only revert edits when there is a legitimate reason to do so (vandalism, for instance) and provide a clear edit summary. And if an change you make is reverted, per WP:BRD you should open a discussion on the article's talk page or on the talk page of the user who made the reversion to seek consensus. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kabali (film), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diff: [1] You should read the template. This has nothing to do with sourcing. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Last warning about this. If you remove the maintenance template again without resolving the clarification issue, I'm going to interrupt your editing privileges. The content doesn't make sense in English. It lacks sufficient context for English-speakers to understand what you are saying. Either fix the problem or leave the template alone. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
This content was problematic as well and I had to flag that for cleanup too. Either fix it, or remove the section, but don't remove the cleanup template until you do one or the other, please. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
I've had to revert this because "massive blockbuster" fails our Neutral Point of View policy. Wikipedia is not a blog. We don't editorialize, advertise, or sensationalize. We present content in a fair and impartial tone. "Became a commercial success" would be closer, but you'd have to attribute that summary to a specific voice. There were other issues: "Largest opening" is vague. Surely an American film had the "largest opening". Do you mean "largest opening day in India"? Where's the source for that? Do you mean "largest opening in Chennai"? Where's the source for that? I didn't see anything in any of the sources that supported those claims. I see "a good opening". I see "the opening has been Grand" (which is vague and subjective), but nothing describing it as the "largest opening" of any specific kind. Also, I don't see anything supporting the 30 crore value you submitted. Lastly, thenewsrecorder.com is a blog, and we do not use blogs for references, since anyone can start a blog and print whatever he wants. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 08:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Veerappan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
At WP:IRC #wikipedia-en-help, I had advised a contributor to undo the edits, sign up, and make a new query to gain consensus on article talk. Please understand that fact while interacting with this edit further. This process has even started. Thanks. -- Gryllida ( talk) 11:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Universalrahu,
The Design Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation is currently seeking relatively newcomer Wikipedians for user studies about their experience with current editing tools and to test out some prototype editing tools. If you’re interested in helping to shape the future of editing on Wikipedia, we would love to have you participate! The study session will take approximately 30 minutes, maximum of 45 minutes.
The study will take place in the next couple weeks, and will require participants to have access to a webcam and microphone (or a laptop with built in cam & mic), with a quiet place to go for a research session. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org and include the following information:
Please let me know if you have any questions! Look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Daisy Chen
User Experience Researcher Dchen (WMF) ( talk) 01:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Spaceman
Spiff 13:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Spaceman Spiff 13:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, just an FYI that if you are being paid for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. See WP:PAID for more information. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2012 Dharmapuri violence, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. THis is your only warning, the next time you remove sourced content and reliable sources because it doesn't suit your POV, you will be blocked. — Spaceman Spiff 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
This comment you left on SpacemanSpiff's talk page is pure rubbish and I have responded accordingly. In case you don't get the ping or don't bother to check it, please stop wasting other editors' time with nonsense. Seriously, you're bringing up crap from 2009 when SpacemanSpiff was new? I assume that's what you're referring to since he hadn't edited that article since 2012. Nobody expects perfection from new editors, only a willingness to learn and to change when problems are pointed out. Similarly, nobody expects you to be perfect, only to be willing to learn and to change when problems are pointed out. And in case you want to get super anal about this, in the 27 July 2009 version of MOS:LEAD (which coincides with SpacemanSpiff's creation of the article), the instructions to avoid "acclaimed" had not yet been introduced, and wasn't added until 3 years later. So for all you know, the community didn't yet have a problem with that phrasing. Total waste of time. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Universalrahu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Santhanam (actor), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [3] Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi - I'm concerned about this new list that you've created. As a list composed mostly (presumably) of BLPs, I'd expect to see a reliable source for each and every individual on the list, confirming that they were introduced to cinema by Bharathiraja. I can't see any sourcing confirming that any of them were, and the first couple of articles I clicked on did not mention Bharathiraja anywhere in them. I'm going to draftify this article, to give you time to work on the sourcing - please also consider the article title before republishing, I'm not sure 'new faces' is formal enough for an encyclopedic list. Something like 'List of notable actors introduced to cinema by Bharathiraja' might be more appropriate. Best GirthSummit (blether) 12:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of new faces introduced by Bharathiraja, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
GirthSummit
(blether) 12:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
You are not verifying what the source says. Where ever I edit , I edit based on books and references from reputed universities. Please do not glorify castes and communities. Also read the sources carefully. Thanks
You need to check the amount of discussion I have made in talk pages. I kindly request you to go through talk pages, Also when ever I make a edit it based on university academic books and resources. so Please I have posted my comments on talk pages. request you to do the same.
Sangitha rani111 (
talk) 01:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
In Karnataka, where she was born there is no caste called Gounder. Its a caste called GOwda which she belongs to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetankcp ( talk • contribs) 06:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Universalrahu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of new faces introduced by Bharathiraja".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 10:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC).
-- RegentsPark ( comment) 12:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Paris Jayaraj, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk) 07:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
U r deleting everything created by some casteist director by simply saying POV and unreliable citation for everything. Many other people also watching the pages. I will report to adminstrator. 2409:4072:6C9F:42AA:2EE5:7BCE:F1B:2CB1 ( talk) 04:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 05:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
I am aware of Wikipedia policies. You first see Wikipedia:MOSFILMS. A news completely not connected with film has been included and that too from unreliable sources. See Reliable sources guidelines on Indian cinema Wikipedia:INCINE. If you are going to add news from unreliable sources not connected with the film. You will be reported to Administrators.-- Universalrahu ( talk) 05:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
U are only saying what you hate as unreliable. BBC, Indian express and times of india Tamil is not unreliable. 2409:4072:6C9F:42AA:3C60:AA0C:E631:AE6 ( talk) 06:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Spaceman
Spiff 06:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:Takku Mukku Tikku Thalam Fim Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)