It is 6:45 AM where this user lives.

You are cringe. Love, ― TaltosKieron Talk 22:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC) reply

That was just mean. You can't treat new users like this. Go fuck yourself, ― Levi_OP ^Talk 23:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi Tunakanski! Thanks for not contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

You say you aren't fond of commies, huh? If you mean communists, then yeah I HATE COMMUNISTS, as I would say. Hello from the dude you slapped a trout on the face of, KingAviationKid ( talk) 16:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Edit-What in the world does "weezer is ass" mean? - KingAviationKid ( talk) 16:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi! I deleted that entire section because it was old information that had been reused elsewhere and not deleted at the time of the initial edit yesterday. I'm not sure why you reinstated the deletion when it clearly made no sense to the overall entry. Everything, including the costs were transfer down in the buildings section and other information shifted upwards. Thanks!

BCHAMuseum ( talk) 18:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)BCHAMuseum reply

@ BCHAMuseum: I reverted the edit mostly due to COI reasons. You have already been notified on your talk page that your account username does not follow WP:COI guidelines, and you have yet to put a disclosure template on your User/Talk page. Since this is required of accounts that are connected to the articles they mainly edit, you have to do it according to Wikipedia guidelines. ―  Tuna ^No_SurprisesPlease 19:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC) reply

If you add the following template to the top of your talk page, then the issue should be resolved. ―  Tuna ^No_SurprisesPlease 19:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC) reply

{{Connected contributor|User1=BCHAMuseum |U1-declared=yes| U1-otherlinks=(Optional) Insert relevant affiliations, disclosures, article drafts or diffs showing COI contributions.}}

Just noting that clear username violations may be reported to WP:UAA; the discussion page is mainly for discussing edge/unclear cases. 331dot ( talk) 19:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC) reply

If they ignore the policies further then I'll report it. ―  Tuna ^No_SurprisesPlease 19:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello. Regarding the recent reverts you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Ethan Gaming 7640 21:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks, I think I may have visited the page before but I wasn't aware of it's usefulness. I'll be sure to use it in the future. ―  Tuna ^No_SurprisesPlease 22:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi Tunakanski, I was reconfiguring information on the Grace Family Vineyards wiki, and added information that was not included in the summary and description, despite being included in the already cited references. I didn't actually remove any information. Could you re-commit my edits, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.131.249.134 ( talk) 15:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC) reply

I recommitted my edits with and included an Edit Summary this time. Hoping this helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.131.249.134 ( talk) 15:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hollow Knight you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski ( talk) 14:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Hollow Knight you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hollow Knight for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski ( talk) 18:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Russian invasion and politicized or disruptive edits/editors ban request. The discussion is about the topic Russia–Switzerland relations. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 17:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is about a revert that you have done recently to Gun laws in Poland article. If you do not agree with me removing a single reference, it is completely OK to revert that single edit, putting the reference back. But in the process you have reverted (and I assume it was an honest mistake on your part) also several other edits:

• my additions of a few other references, including ones to official legal acts (I cannot think of more authoritative references)
• several technical changes (such as legal terminology more aligned to English one, e.g. calling ministerial documents "regulations" and not "orders")
• a detailed list of misdemeanors
• updates that brought the article more in line with the Wikipedia Manual of Style, such us usage of quotes, dashes and thousand commas
• notes explaining some legal conundrums
• various minor corrections of typos, capitalization, grammar, style or simple "thought mistakes" such as me writing "self-service" instead of "self-defence" (blush)

This is from an user that had done extensive work on the article, but does not want to expose his Wikipedia user name with regard to for this particular topic at this time -- 140.101.160.252 ( talk) 16:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

My apologies, I only meant to revert the removal of the reference. ―  Tuna ^No_SurprisesPlease 16:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

I think I managed to bring the article back to the desired state, including your intended revert, please edit if you think more changes are needed. I still kinda want to remove the reference as the referenced official page only says that the President has signed two new acts into law, without further details. The relevant change to suppressors regulations is already described in the amendments section, under 2020 "heading", including a reference to the actual text of the law signed by the President. May I ask for your recommendation on how to handle such reference removals in the future, not to cause any alarms? Thanks -- 140.101.160.252 ( talk) 17:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Dear Tunakanski,

Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

• Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
• templates to use and, of course:
• the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

Cheers, Nick Moyes ( talk) 01:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello Tunakanski, just a note that editors can remove warnings from their own talk page, see WP:BLANKING. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi, I only readded them since it seemed to be interfering with ClueBot and RW giving out proper warnings to the user. I'll make sure not to do it again in the future. ―  Tuna + 13:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• I think that we don't need to accuse each other of vandalism, but fraternally find a compromise. The fact is that my edit [1] in George S. Patton was aimed at removing a random image rewarding a soldier who is not related to the section of the text in which it was placed, I'm sorry that it could look like vandalism in someone's eyes. At the same time, you sincerely and persistently improve wikipedia so I understand your concerns about such edits as mine in a featured article, but I think we both need to get back to the true value of Wikipedia - the Goodfaith cooperation and solve it out in the spirit of friendship and mutual consent, with respect TyronMcLannister ( talk) 14:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello there Tunakanski,

I am interested in bringing Hollow Knight to FA status sometime in the future. Since you have been relatively active on that page, I was hoping if you could help me research and clean the page for an eventual nomination. I already have a checklist that I received from FA coordinator, and if you are interested, I would be happy to have you help me prepare the page.

CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 02:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

I'd love to help with that. I'll be relatively busy for the next week or so due to finals, but after that I am completely free to help with whatever is needed. ―  TUNA × 12:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

(@ CollectiveSolidarity: forgot to ping) ―  TUNA × 12:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

I am taking an abrupt WikiBreak right now because of personal issues, so I will unavailable until May 27. Just letting you know of my situation. CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 18:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Also also, I have a question : Do you happen to know any other editors that can help work on this? FAs often take at least a month of preparation to prepare for nomination, but groups of editors can streamline the process if all are working together. Once I get back, I am going to leave a notice at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games to ask for some help, and a WP:FAM could also help by reviewing the page. Once again, thank you for helping me along with this. It will be a tough project, but we can try our best! CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 18:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

I know that Levi OP will most likely be willing to help, as he assisted me with promoting the article to GA status. Beyond him, however, we might need to rely on members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games for additional help. Currently, I'm working on a list of everything that still needs improvement in the article, besides just general expansion. ―  TUNA × 19:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Bends (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MoonJet -- MoonJet ( talk) 05:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello Tunakanski,

I have a section on my talk page called User talk:CollectiveSolidarity/FAC Comms where we can discuss improvements to Hollow Knight. I have finished up my real-life work and can now work on the article. I have some comments from a FA coordinator that I will paste there that we can address first. Cheers! CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 20:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The article The Bends (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Bends (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MoonJet -- MoonJet ( talk) 05:42, 3 June 2022 (UTC) reply

HI, I work for the shark trust and thus edited th epage as the majority of it wasn't true. I do not know how to add add myself as a conflict of interest? Conor HD John ( talk) 15:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Conor HD John: Hi, thank you for reaching out. I recommend reading this section on the WP:COI page. Basically, if you are an employee of a company, you are strongly discouraged from directly editing the article of that company. You also must disclose on your User page what company you work for.

These are the main points:

• you must disclose who is paying you, on whose behalf the edits are made, and any other relevant affiliation;
• you should make the disclosure on your user page, on affected talk pages, and whenever you discuss the topic;
• you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly;

If you follow the 'disclose' hyperlink and scroll up a bit it will let you know how to add the template to your page and what information to fill in. If you have any other questions you can visit the Teahouse and ask about it there. Have a nice rest of your day. ―  TUNA × 17:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I ( Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC) reply

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tunakanski ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

127.0.0.1 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Gjbowlin". The reason given for Gjbowlin's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

• Blocking administrator: ‪Alexf‬ ( talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Lifted, based on an investigation here. Sorry for the trouble! I suspect you can guess why this may happen from time to time. Yamla ( talk) 18:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello Tunakanski,

I recently made an edit listing the Stasis damage type under the Kinetic slot and you reverted that edit saying "there are stasis weapons that can go in the energy and special weapons slot" however I can't find any examples of Energy Stasis weapons and the Special slot does not exist in Destiny 2 (it was replaced with "Energy" and "Heavy" was replaced with "Power").

Here is a list of all current Stasis weapons in Destiny 2: https://www.light.gg/db/new-items/season/12/stasis-weapons/

There are no weapons listed in the Energy slot, only Kinetic & Power but the sentence I edited is specific to the Kinetic/Energy distinction and does not address Power weapons so they should not affect it.

I think the section should be set back to the way I had edited it since it currently shows incorrect information.

Let me know what you think, I just figured I'd talk it out instead of trying to revert it without discussion. 216.24.45.10 ( talk) 18:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC) reply

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tunakanski ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

127.0.0.1 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Gobberwob". The reason given for Gobberwob's block is: "Vandalism7".

• Blocking administrator: ‪Materialscientist‬ ( talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: No problems with your editing. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

You have a great user page. I hate Weezer too. HadesTTW (he/him •  talk) 20:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you! A lot of the credit goes to Levi OP. ―  TUNA × 15:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply

My edit was made in regards to plot points introduced via the game's seasonal cinematics. As far as I'm aware, this type of content does not necessitate having citation or reliable sources. In fact, the Settings section itself was already lacking in citations, with only two small ones for the very basic plot from the game's first year, and nothing regarding the new details introduced in later seasons. The boss 1904 ( talk) 07:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Tuna,

You keep undoing my changes and I'm wondering if there is a specific reason why? 130.76.120.201 ( talk) 18:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC) reply

It's not a Chinese owned company, it is based in California which is in the United States of America. Investors does not equal ownership. ―  TUNA × 02:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you for responding and giving me an opportunity to talk to you about this. I agree that an investor does not necessarily mean that you are the owner, however, when an investor owns 100% of the shares of a company they are then, the sole owner of the company. I.E. one of the reasons Manchester United fans are upset at the Glazer family is because they bought out all the shares of Manchester United and became the sole owner of the club. The same thing has happened to Riot Games. TenCent is the sole investor and own 100% of the company making them the sole owner of the company.

[2] https://www.alistdaily.com/media/what-tencents-ownership-of-riot-games-means/

[3] https://www.cnet.com/tech/gaming/league-of-legends-maker-riot-games-now-completely-owned-by-chinas-tencent/

Additionally, the logic that "it is headquartered in the US so it is a US company" is flawed. Many companies have headquarters in different countries and they are not then considered a x country company. I.E. TenCent America is headquartered in Palo Alto, California, but I don't think anyone would argue that they are an American company.

[4] https://sage-tips.com/trendy/does-tencent-operate-in-the-us/#:~:text=Tencent%20America%20is%20the%20US%20branch%20of%20Tencent%2C,offices%20in%20New%20York%2C%20Los%20Angeles%2C%20and%20Seattle.

Sony Interactive Entertainment is headquartered in San Mateo, California but I don't think anyone would argue that PlayStation is an American product.

Sony Interactive Entertainment

Microsoft has headquarters in Japan but they are not considered a Japanese based company.

Microsoft Japan

Additionally, Riot Games has headquarters in China.

[5] https://archive.esportsobserver.com/china-esports-recap-july1-2020/

Once again, thank you for communicating with me in good faith and if you see a flaw in my logic, please let me know. 130.76.120.201 ( talk) 17:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC) reply

I get what you are saying and would agree that they are basically owned by Tencent, however, as you said, just because a company has a regional headquarters in a country doesn't mean that's where they are based. I believe Riot has it's European Headquarters in Dublin, but that doesn't mean it's an Irish company. Additionally, if you look at the Supercell (video game company) article, you will notice that they are owned by Tencent (and listed as a subsidiary on Tencent's page) but the first sentence of the lede only mentions that it is a Finnish company, not that it is Chinese-owned. ―  TUNA × 13:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you for responding, if we both agree that they are owned by TenCent, and we agree that TenCent is a Chinese company, then wouldn't that by default make them a Chinese company? And just because their headquarters are located in the US, that does not mean they are a US company because their parent company, the company giving them marching orders if you will, pay their pay checks etc, is Chinese. wouldn't that make them a Chinese company? 130.76.120.201 ( talk) 13:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The issue is that Riot is its own company. It's owned by a larger Chinese company, sure, but Riot itself is still based in the United States where it was also started, which, in my opinion, makes it an American company. Another example I can think of, with similar "balances of power", if you will is Microsoft and Skype. Skype is a subsidiary of Microsoft, but on Wikipedia, in the lede, it is still only labeled as a Luxembourgish company. So, I think we can still apply that same train of thought to Riot and other articles for tech or game companies and not specifically mention their ownership in the first sentence of the lede since they are their own companies after all. ―  TUNA × 14:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Tuna, I guess we are now back to the original point that if Riot is owned by a larger Chinese company, than it is not in fact it's own company. It may be able to operate with a certain amount of freedom but whenever TenCent decides to jerk the chain and force Riot to do what they want they can. Similar to how Bytedance, parent company of TikTok, has access to any US user data that TikTok has collected and TikTok has no say in the matter.

[6] https://www.businessinsider.com/tiktok-confirms-us-user-data-accessed-in-china-bytedance-2022-7#:~:text=TikTok%20confirmed%20that%20China-based%20employees%20of%20its%20Chinese,to%20nine%20Republican%20senators%27%20inquiries%20about%20the%20matter.

Additionally, whenever anyone thinks of Skype, they do automatically think of Skype being a Microsoft product. 130.76.120.201 ( talk) 14:07, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi! You changed the dates on Scaring the Hoes from MDY dates to DMY dates, which goes against the "use MDY dates template" at the very start of the article. In the future, you probably shouldn't change dates without referring to the dates template usually on an article. See MOS:DATES. ULPS ^{( talk • contribs)} 14:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC) reply

You gave out incorrect information at the Teahouse. Most books have two ISBN numbers, 10 digits and 13 digits. We prefer the 13 digit numbers on Wikipedia. The obvious shortcut is WP:ISBN, which says Please use the ISBN-13 if both are provided by the original work.. Please do not answer questions at the Teahouse unless you are highly confident that your answer is accurate. Thank you. Cullen328 ( talk) 18:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi, sorry about that. I had read the MOS page on it and it did not mention which ISBN to use, so I figured that was where I’d find any information on the topic. Won’t happen again. ―  TUNA × 23:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 ( talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Not gonna lie: your edit summary made me laugh. Joyous! Noise! 20:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I agree! I also saw it and thought it was very funny. ―  Levi_OP ^Talk 04:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC) reply