Hello triougd, I saw the reasons for your edits and I have to say, that I cannot disagree with them - for example I too, have struggled to find valid verification for the cause section ... I thought I did but not close enough. However I am CONVINCED that this teory is correct because it is more plausible than a whole list of possible causes. - see that I have added a mechanism of action. Can we take this to talk ? Laoseb97 ( talk) 16:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Resolution
Well, I came to this article expecting to find correct (and well-sourced) information on atopic dermatitis. I did not find that. What I instead found was a bunch of unsourced claims and even worse, a bunch of wrongly sourced claims. I consider the last part to be especially damning since I don't like to be lied to when I read an article. The state of this article is so bad that it actually managed to do what thousands of other wikipedia-articles has never been able to do before; making me register an account. - Wow - that's harsh but I can understand where you are coming from. At the talk page I have now suggested that I move my lectin hypothesis to a different page until more suitable sources are published (jst remeber you heard it from me first - that's if it's actually true). This should resolve our talk on a good note. Feel free to revert the page meanwhile - As I can't.
Thank you for all of your educative links.
Laoseb97 (
talk) 19:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi Triougd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello triougd, I saw the reasons for your edits and I have to say, that I cannot disagree with them - for example I too, have struggled to find valid verification for the cause section ... I thought I did but not close enough. However I am CONVINCED that this teory is correct because it is more plausible than a whole list of possible causes. - see that I have added a mechanism of action. Can we take this to talk ? Laoseb97 ( talk) 16:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Resolution
Well, I came to this article expecting to find correct (and well-sourced) information on atopic dermatitis. I did not find that. What I instead found was a bunch of unsourced claims and even worse, a bunch of wrongly sourced claims. I consider the last part to be especially damning since I don't like to be lied to when I read an article. The state of this article is so bad that it actually managed to do what thousands of other wikipedia-articles has never been able to do before; making me register an account. - Wow - that's harsh but I can understand where you are coming from. At the talk page I have now suggested that I move my lectin hypothesis to a different page until more suitable sources are published (jst remeber you heard it from me first - that's if it's actually true). This should resolve our talk on a good note. Feel free to revert the page meanwhile - As I can't.
Thank you for all of your educative links.
Laoseb97 (
talk) 19:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Triougd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |