Hallo, You converted The Quick Fix from a redirect to the TV show to a dab page, so it's your responsibility to fix the two incoming links which used to work fine and now lead to the dab page instead - see /info/en/?search=Special:WhatLinksHere/The_Quick_Fix. Thanks. Pam D 08:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the warm welcome and helping me create my WP account. Vmavra ( talk) 10:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Topcipher, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kalyanpur, Baruipur, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: We don't delete articles on villages. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 19:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede 66 22:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I am User:Scottyoak2. The Welcoming Committee has instructions about how to Welcome new users. I wanted to suggest that you review their recommendations regarding users that have not contributed yet, especially their advice to Always check their edits first. I see that you occasionally welcome new users at the rate of 10 per minute, and that most of them have not made any edits yet. If you have any questions, please let me know. Scottyoak2 ( talk) 05:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Please correct your signature to follow the instructions in WP:SIG#CustomSig. Thanks. - Roxy the dog. bark 11:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Topcipher. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Lundby Efterskole as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because educational institutions are specifically exempted from the reach of CSD A7. Please read it carefully. Adam9007 ( talk) 05:34, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Topcipher. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Ammakkoru Tharattu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to films or TV programmes. Thank you. Adam9007 ( talk) 05:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
On my page Syed Shah Kasturi Bhukhari There are lots of Link's available externaly but there is a problem "Edit not saved".?? I don't know why this happen Rehman Badami ( talk) 05:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
OK I do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rehman Badami ( talk • contribs) 06:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC) What is BLP and PRD ??🙄🙄 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rehman Badami ( talk • contribs) 06:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@ User:Topcipher One Source? there are so many sources available Again the Same thing happened "Error Edit Not Saved" ???you can search about shah Aqeeq baba in his documentary the Kasturi shah is also present in Geo TV
and Samaa TV documentaries and is keep under the WP:NGEO you can sent one team of Wikipedia in this area for more evidences Badaami Badaami talk 06:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@ User:Topcipher BLP means Biography about living person. But Syed Shah Kasturi Bhukhari died 700 years ago sorry I can't make this article by draft because he is well known Saint in Asia people are searching about him on Wikipedia but they find nothing . I am saying there is problem "Error Edit not saved" and my Source (referenced links) not save??? I have lots of reference but it not saved???
Badaami Badaami talk 06:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
How can I explain?? Please sir search about Shah Aqeeq Baba Documentary you can get evidences I have issue to Saving page I don't know why because it's "error edit not saved" in my page and here's too.Sir give me your E-mail to I can send you reference about this page
Badaami Badaami talk 06:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Elliott Marc Jones is very well known in the indie gaming scene, his game Redactem has over 60,000 owners on Steam and is the number one rated game on IndieGameStand. In 2017 he was listed as Expert Rankup's fourth most influential gaming personality, surely that's enough to prove he is worthy enough of a Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsonite24 ( talk • contribs) 09:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Topcipher,
I would appreciate if you would indicate to which of the sources I added you take objection, and why.__ Gamren ( talk) 08:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Topcipher,
I have removed the copied content from Nandi Mngoma's page. I am still working on that article. I created the article earlier today.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siduduzo ( talk • contribs) 12:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Tom Fritsche has been deleted as not notable. This page should be speedy deleted. Xx236 ( talk) 09:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Larrydouglas222. An edit that you recently made to India seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The section below was a reasonable edit, but the other content about the emancipation proclamation was just weird. —Preceding undated comment added 18:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the PROD. I have now added one reliable source to the article and deleted the PROD notice. — Charles Stewart (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher
I noticed you recently changed {{reflist}} to <references /> in an article on my watchlist. I have no gripe, but would like to know why you went to the trouble; I was under the impression they were roughly equivalent but {{reflist}} was preferred (I used <references /> in my first couple of pages and was persuaded it was a nasty habit). Doug butler ( talk) 02:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Nate Leipciger; however, I have unreviewed it. The article was full of copyvio. Please remember to check all articles for copyright violations. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 21:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Just a heads up. DEFAULTSORT values such as this one are not needed. DEFAULTSORT is by default the pagename (case insensitive). -- Magioladitis ( talk) 10:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Please read the rules of use for AWB, esp item 4 - "Do not make insignificant or inconsequential edits". Edits like this are not helpful. Thanks. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 19:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher, I noted that you added the Orphan template on article I created. I have link two pages to it. I'll like you to review it again and hope you'll like it. Thanks!
Amirk94391 ( talk) 17:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to Red Wolf (bull) has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Don't bite newbies and don't template good faith editors. Montanabw (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher, I saw that you have added the Orphan template on article page I created. If no other pages mention V-Key, what is the best way to link this to other articles? Appreciate your advice! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsiah ( talk • contribs) 06:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher, thanks for your advice above. it was really helpful! i saw you have added a tag on article is either heavily paraphrased/copy-pasted. actually i have tried using my own words as far as possible, but some parts are rather technical and i do not want to misrepresent the meaning, which was why i kept certain terms. i am working on that now, and if there's a specific line or para you think is particularly regurgitated from somewhere, do let me know? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsiah ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Topcipher, this tool is so cool and it's a really good guide. it gave me an idea which areas i could rephrase better in my own words! nice! andi managed to reduce the similarities to 12.3% - mostly technical terms that can't really be changed though. what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsiah ( talk • contribs) 16:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Gloriana Rada ( talk) 17:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Hi! I've completed my degree in Architecture and I am studying quantum physics but as I haven't made something mean full into the world (like the porn stars and Hollywood stars you put here) you guys don't allow me posting my brief here, nice, thank you, have a nice day!. Gloriana Rada ( talk) 17:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Gloriana Rada ( talk) 18:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Thanks for your words, and taking the time to justify. Regards. Gloriana Rada ( talk) 18:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
@Topcipher thanks for the invitation. I will consider adding some of my relevant architecture manuscripts to create some wikipedia articles, when I have some time. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gloriana Rada ( talk • contribs) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing up that page on Miroslav mate - I'm new to the community so I easily overlook those mistakes. I wish you luck mate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sp00n exe ( talk • contribs) 04:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Per the specific instructions at
WP:Orphan, please don't tag newly-created articles with {{
orphan}} tags; it's disruptive, annoying, and a waste of everyone's time. If an article is newly-created, there's a very high likelihood that someone is working on it; it's inappropriate to plaster new articles with maintenance tags except in a few exceptional cases such as suspected copyright violations or serious issues with neutrality or verifiability. In particular, you certainly shouldn't be using AWB to tag-bomb articles, since it's unable to detect context or scan the history to see who is currently working on the article and whether they're someone who's likely to improve it (the auto-tagging facility of AWB is intended primarily for use on smaller wikis where there's a presumption that every article is being manually reviewed). While there are some legitimate uses for AWB, using it to spew maintenance tags over
Special:NewPages is certainly not one of them; as has always been the case, "Being bold" is not a justification for mass editing lacking demonstrable consensus. If challenged, the onus is on the AWB operator to demonstrate or achieve consensus for changes they wish to make on a large scale
. ‑
Iridescent 15:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
"...a relatively new article that the creator is planning to link from other pages, but has not identified other articles or otherwise carried out that task yet (a page generally should not be tagged as an orphan until it has been around for a little while). Being an orphan is not a reason to delete an article, only to fix whatever issues it has.
An orphan, especially if it has been created by a newbie, may need to be flagged with other article issue tags. See {{ Multiple issues}} for a list of issues with which an article can be flagged."
I think you're under a misapprehension as to what AWB is and what its purpose is; on en-wikipedia—which is all we're concerned with here—it's a tool to allow editors to make multiple repetitive changes that would be time-consuming to perform manually, not a tool for patrolling new pages (which should be done manually, as unless and until
WP:ORES is functioning properly there's no way for software to evaluate article quality). Regarding I would also like to point that there is a reason why the AWB tool has the 'New Pages' section to begin with
, I think you have a serious misapprehension here; the reason isn't "because it's expected that AWB be used for new page patrol on English Wikipedia", it's because (1) AWB is a tool intended for use on multiple MediaWiki sites, not just on developed Wikimedia projects like en-wikipedia, and (2) on occasion it can be useful for generating representative lists of recently generated articles. Seeing as you appear to be so fond of quoting guidelines, I'll quote the large bold text from
WP:New pages patrol: Care should be exercised when reviewing very new pages. Tagging anything other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense only a few minutes after creation may only serve to annoy the page author.
If this were just a one-off incident I wouldn't dream of revoking a userright, but this was
systematic inappropriate tagging, at such high speed that you couldn't possibly have been reading the articles concerned or checking the edit histories to determine the context. Bluntly, I've done you a favour by revoking the AWB userright, as if you'd continued you'd have been almost certain to have been blocked under
Wikipedia's policy on bot-like editing. AWB is a valuable tool, but when you signed up to it you agreed to abide by
its terms of use, which you clearly haven't been. ‑
Iridescent 19:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, please tell me what needs to be changed. The articles cited are from outside sources. There was nothing like Mondo Bando at that time in Seattle. It would be great to be included in the history of the early Seattle Heavy Metal movement. Thank you. 174.31.24.203 ( talk) 21:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
174.31.24.203 (
talk) 21:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Topcipher.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Bird of prey • Tandoori chicken Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Hello Topcipher. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Open Access in Algeria, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 17:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher,,
Gupta surname is used by teli caste in Bihar, UP, Maharashtra, chattisgarh and other states. Half of the Guptas of India are of Teli Caste.
Thanks and Regards, Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.192.210.173 ( talk) 18:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Check the edit history. Phrase "widespread opposition to donald trump" removed by anonymous and they called it unsourced and biased. But I had it backed up by a 3 million person march the day after his inauguration and the fact that he lost the popular vote. I didn't say whether he was good or bad, just the fact that there is widespread opposition. When I reverted this person's deletion, you reverted me and called it vandalism.
Thanks
Mjleone ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! If you like to revert vandalism, keep an eye out on that page -- tons of targeting my contributions I have been dealing with because it doesn't fit a specific biased narrative.
Mjleone ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing MohammadReza Dehghan, Topcipher.
Unfortunately Mabalu has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Unreviewing so that if the creator removes the deletion nomination again, it won't slip by as "reviewed"
To reply, leave a comment on Mabalu's talk page.
Mabalu ( talk) 10:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi you have edited this [1] as a clean up using AWB. Could you please explain this edit. Thank you. FITINDIA (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hallo, You converted The Quick Fix from a redirect to the TV show to a dab page, so it's your responsibility to fix the two incoming links which used to work fine and now lead to the dab page instead - see /info/en/?search=Special:WhatLinksHere/The_Quick_Fix. Thanks. Pam D 08:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the warm welcome and helping me create my WP account. Vmavra ( talk) 10:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Topcipher, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kalyanpur, Baruipur, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: We don't delete articles on villages. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 19:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede 66 22:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I am User:Scottyoak2. The Welcoming Committee has instructions about how to Welcome new users. I wanted to suggest that you review their recommendations regarding users that have not contributed yet, especially their advice to Always check their edits first. I see that you occasionally welcome new users at the rate of 10 per minute, and that most of them have not made any edits yet. If you have any questions, please let me know. Scottyoak2 ( talk) 05:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Please correct your signature to follow the instructions in WP:SIG#CustomSig. Thanks. - Roxy the dog. bark 11:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Topcipher. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Lundby Efterskole as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because educational institutions are specifically exempted from the reach of CSD A7. Please read it carefully. Adam9007 ( talk) 05:34, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Topcipher. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Ammakkoru Tharattu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to films or TV programmes. Thank you. Adam9007 ( talk) 05:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
On my page Syed Shah Kasturi Bhukhari There are lots of Link's available externaly but there is a problem "Edit not saved".?? I don't know why this happen Rehman Badami ( talk) 05:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
OK I do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rehman Badami ( talk • contribs) 06:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC) What is BLP and PRD ??🙄🙄 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rehman Badami ( talk • contribs) 06:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@ User:Topcipher One Source? there are so many sources available Again the Same thing happened "Error Edit Not Saved" ???you can search about shah Aqeeq baba in his documentary the Kasturi shah is also present in Geo TV
and Samaa TV documentaries and is keep under the WP:NGEO you can sent one team of Wikipedia in this area for more evidences Badaami Badaami talk 06:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@ User:Topcipher BLP means Biography about living person. But Syed Shah Kasturi Bhukhari died 700 years ago sorry I can't make this article by draft because he is well known Saint in Asia people are searching about him on Wikipedia but they find nothing . I am saying there is problem "Error Edit not saved" and my Source (referenced links) not save??? I have lots of reference but it not saved???
Badaami Badaami talk 06:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
How can I explain?? Please sir search about Shah Aqeeq Baba Documentary you can get evidences I have issue to Saving page I don't know why because it's "error edit not saved" in my page and here's too.Sir give me your E-mail to I can send you reference about this page
Badaami Badaami talk 06:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Elliott Marc Jones is very well known in the indie gaming scene, his game Redactem has over 60,000 owners on Steam and is the number one rated game on IndieGameStand. In 2017 he was listed as Expert Rankup's fourth most influential gaming personality, surely that's enough to prove he is worthy enough of a Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsonite24 ( talk • contribs) 09:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Topcipher,
I would appreciate if you would indicate to which of the sources I added you take objection, and why.__ Gamren ( talk) 08:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Topcipher,
I have removed the copied content from Nandi Mngoma's page. I am still working on that article. I created the article earlier today.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siduduzo ( talk • contribs) 12:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Tom Fritsche has been deleted as not notable. This page should be speedy deleted. Xx236 ( talk) 09:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Larrydouglas222. An edit that you recently made to India seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The section below was a reasonable edit, but the other content about the emancipation proclamation was just weird. —Preceding undated comment added 18:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the PROD. I have now added one reliable source to the article and deleted the PROD notice. — Charles Stewart (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher
I noticed you recently changed {{reflist}} to <references /> in an article on my watchlist. I have no gripe, but would like to know why you went to the trouble; I was under the impression they were roughly equivalent but {{reflist}} was preferred (I used <references /> in my first couple of pages and was persuaded it was a nasty habit). Doug butler ( talk) 02:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Nate Leipciger; however, I have unreviewed it. The article was full of copyvio. Please remember to check all articles for copyright violations. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 21:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Just a heads up. DEFAULTSORT values such as this one are not needed. DEFAULTSORT is by default the pagename (case insensitive). -- Magioladitis ( talk) 10:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Please read the rules of use for AWB, esp item 4 - "Do not make insignificant or inconsequential edits". Edits like this are not helpful. Thanks. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 19:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher, I noted that you added the Orphan template on article I created. I have link two pages to it. I'll like you to review it again and hope you'll like it. Thanks!
Amirk94391 ( talk) 17:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to Red Wolf (bull) has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Don't bite newbies and don't template good faith editors. Montanabw (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher, I saw that you have added the Orphan template on article page I created. If no other pages mention V-Key, what is the best way to link this to other articles? Appreciate your advice! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsiah ( talk • contribs) 06:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher, thanks for your advice above. it was really helpful! i saw you have added a tag on article is either heavily paraphrased/copy-pasted. actually i have tried using my own words as far as possible, but some parts are rather technical and i do not want to misrepresent the meaning, which was why i kept certain terms. i am working on that now, and if there's a specific line or para you think is particularly regurgitated from somewhere, do let me know? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsiah ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Topcipher, this tool is so cool and it's a really good guide. it gave me an idea which areas i could rephrase better in my own words! nice! andi managed to reduce the similarities to 12.3% - mostly technical terms that can't really be changed though. what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsiah ( talk • contribs) 16:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Gloriana Rada ( talk) 17:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Hi! I've completed my degree in Architecture and I am studying quantum physics but as I haven't made something mean full into the world (like the porn stars and Hollywood stars you put here) you guys don't allow me posting my brief here, nice, thank you, have a nice day!. Gloriana Rada ( talk) 17:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Gloriana Rada ( talk) 18:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Thanks for your words, and taking the time to justify. Regards. Gloriana Rada ( talk) 18:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
@Topcipher thanks for the invitation. I will consider adding some of my relevant architecture manuscripts to create some wikipedia articles, when I have some time. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gloriana Rada ( talk • contribs) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing up that page on Miroslav mate - I'm new to the community so I easily overlook those mistakes. I wish you luck mate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sp00n exe ( talk • contribs) 04:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Per the specific instructions at
WP:Orphan, please don't tag newly-created articles with {{
orphan}} tags; it's disruptive, annoying, and a waste of everyone's time. If an article is newly-created, there's a very high likelihood that someone is working on it; it's inappropriate to plaster new articles with maintenance tags except in a few exceptional cases such as suspected copyright violations or serious issues with neutrality or verifiability. In particular, you certainly shouldn't be using AWB to tag-bomb articles, since it's unable to detect context or scan the history to see who is currently working on the article and whether they're someone who's likely to improve it (the auto-tagging facility of AWB is intended primarily for use on smaller wikis where there's a presumption that every article is being manually reviewed). While there are some legitimate uses for AWB, using it to spew maintenance tags over
Special:NewPages is certainly not one of them; as has always been the case, "Being bold" is not a justification for mass editing lacking demonstrable consensus. If challenged, the onus is on the AWB operator to demonstrate or achieve consensus for changes they wish to make on a large scale
. ‑
Iridescent 15:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
"...a relatively new article that the creator is planning to link from other pages, but has not identified other articles or otherwise carried out that task yet (a page generally should not be tagged as an orphan until it has been around for a little while). Being an orphan is not a reason to delete an article, only to fix whatever issues it has.
An orphan, especially if it has been created by a newbie, may need to be flagged with other article issue tags. See {{ Multiple issues}} for a list of issues with which an article can be flagged."
I think you're under a misapprehension as to what AWB is and what its purpose is; on en-wikipedia—which is all we're concerned with here—it's a tool to allow editors to make multiple repetitive changes that would be time-consuming to perform manually, not a tool for patrolling new pages (which should be done manually, as unless and until
WP:ORES is functioning properly there's no way for software to evaluate article quality). Regarding I would also like to point that there is a reason why the AWB tool has the 'New Pages' section to begin with
, I think you have a serious misapprehension here; the reason isn't "because it's expected that AWB be used for new page patrol on English Wikipedia", it's because (1) AWB is a tool intended for use on multiple MediaWiki sites, not just on developed Wikimedia projects like en-wikipedia, and (2) on occasion it can be useful for generating representative lists of recently generated articles. Seeing as you appear to be so fond of quoting guidelines, I'll quote the large bold text from
WP:New pages patrol: Care should be exercised when reviewing very new pages. Tagging anything other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense only a few minutes after creation may only serve to annoy the page author.
If this were just a one-off incident I wouldn't dream of revoking a userright, but this was
systematic inappropriate tagging, at such high speed that you couldn't possibly have been reading the articles concerned or checking the edit histories to determine the context. Bluntly, I've done you a favour by revoking the AWB userright, as if you'd continued you'd have been almost certain to have been blocked under
Wikipedia's policy on bot-like editing. AWB is a valuable tool, but when you signed up to it you agreed to abide by
its terms of use, which you clearly haven't been. ‑
Iridescent 19:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, please tell me what needs to be changed. The articles cited are from outside sources. There was nothing like Mondo Bando at that time in Seattle. It would be great to be included in the history of the early Seattle Heavy Metal movement. Thank you. 174.31.24.203 ( talk) 21:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
174.31.24.203 (
talk) 21:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Topcipher.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Bird of prey • Tandoori chicken Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Hello Topcipher. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Open Access in Algeria, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 17:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Topcipher,,
Gupta surname is used by teli caste in Bihar, UP, Maharashtra, chattisgarh and other states. Half of the Guptas of India are of Teli Caste.
Thanks and Regards, Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.192.210.173 ( talk) 18:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Check the edit history. Phrase "widespread opposition to donald trump" removed by anonymous and they called it unsourced and biased. But I had it backed up by a 3 million person march the day after his inauguration and the fact that he lost the popular vote. I didn't say whether he was good or bad, just the fact that there is widespread opposition. When I reverted this person's deletion, you reverted me and called it vandalism.
Thanks
Mjleone ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! If you like to revert vandalism, keep an eye out on that page -- tons of targeting my contributions I have been dealing with because it doesn't fit a specific biased narrative.
Mjleone ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing MohammadReza Dehghan, Topcipher.
Unfortunately Mabalu has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Unreviewing so that if the creator removes the deletion nomination again, it won't slip by as "reviewed"
To reply, leave a comment on Mabalu's talk page.
Mabalu ( talk) 10:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi you have edited this [1] as a clean up using AWB. Could you please explain this edit. Thank you. FITINDIA (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)