Hi The basis of! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#White supremacy revisionism at Western world are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Also, this had nothing to do with the subject of the discussion thread, which concerns an edit made at Western world by the user Rim sim ( talk · contribs). – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 11:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 12:29, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 14:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk) 12:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WP:NOTFORUM violations by The basis of. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. signed,
Rosguill
talk 01:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)The basis of ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
CIR, soapboxing and personal attacks are enough to block me out of editing? This only can be the case for raising the argument of "religiousness, versus pornography, versus the administration's policies". I admit I am not competent with Wikipedia, I admit I attacked the user coming from "pornography", but that's bad attitude, not bad content additions. Thus something is wrong there on your side not here on mine. The basis of ( talk) 06:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
So you admit you have a bad attitude and you're not competent? And you say something is wrong on our side? You were blocked twice before and didn't get this. Frankly this should have been NOTHERE from the beginning. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi The basis of! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#White supremacy revisionism at Western world are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Also, this had nothing to do with the subject of the discussion thread, which concerns an edit made at Western world by the user Rim sim ( talk · contribs). – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 11:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 12:29, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 14:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk) 12:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WP:NOTFORUM violations by The basis of. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. signed,
Rosguill
talk 01:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)The basis of ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
CIR, soapboxing and personal attacks are enough to block me out of editing? This only can be the case for raising the argument of "religiousness, versus pornography, versus the administration's policies". I admit I am not competent with Wikipedia, I admit I attacked the user coming from "pornography", but that's bad attitude, not bad content additions. Thus something is wrong there on your side not here on mine. The basis of ( talk) 06:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
So you admit you have a bad attitude and you're not competent? And you say something is wrong on our side? You were blocked twice before and didn't get this. Frankly this should have been NOTHERE from the beginning. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.