I am editing sporadically during February. |
This is not a forum for anyone who thinks that Wikipedia is an Internet forum. It isn't a forum, if anyone's reading this!. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia anyone can edit, not an Internet forum. Don't get confused! |
Please feel free to leave messages. User:Solumeiras/Status
This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him/her feedback at an
editor review. You may comment on his/her edits at
Wikipedia:Editor review/Solumeiras. |
{{helpme}}
Please can someone find me a bot that will archive my talkpages properly?? I did cut-and-paste archiving, but I'm not sure if that was the best thing to do!
I don't know if the MiszaBot ones are working... anyone able to advise me??
If you can add it to my talk page for the archival bot that would be much appreciated! -- Solumeiras ( talk) 18:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
I'm trying to develop a variant of {{
notice}}, but unlike that one, where it changes colour depending on whether it's in the article/project namespace or article/project talk namespace, I am trying to make another template where the user can change the class according to their personal needs.
This is {{
notice}}'s current code:
{| class="{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk}} messagebox"
| {{#if:{{{header|}}}|rowspan="2"}} align="center" style="width:53px;"|[[Image:{{{image|Info {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}||non-}}talk.png}}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|25px|53px}}|Notice]]
{{#if:{{{header|}}}|
<!-- -->! Notice: {{{header}}}
<!-- -->{{!-}}
}}
|align="left"|{{{1}}}
|}
However, what I'm trying to do is create a template e.g. {{mytemplate|Your text here|standard}} or {{mytemplate|Your text here|messagebox-talk}}
How would you code this template?? I'm not really sure what I'm doing, so all advice is appreciated.
Also, how to I get my wikistress template to work properly - and to make sure it's easy to read. Wherever I put it, it makes section headers too hard to find, like above.
What should I do??
Thanks, -- Solumeiras ( talk) 13:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
I see that you know a bit about these episodes - do you remember 2 un named episodes, as far as i'm aware (and from what I posses) there only was one. -- 88.108.50.63 ( talk) 20:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Response from: JM62
over the recent months, there has been alot of confusion over the early episodes of police, camera, action!. the main reason why the early un-named episode has not been shown is because itv4 do not have the broadcasting rights to certain episodes from each series. there was actually many answers as to this, but i have been looking in the wiki archive and have found the answers. the later episode, police, camera action! '95 was later renamed safety last by producers soon after it's early transmission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.199.142 ( talk) 11:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
$hfmig s, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
$hfmig s.
Magioladitis (
talk) 21:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 04:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
{{award2
|border=solid
|borderwidth=2px
|color=khaki
|image=Bad Title Example.png
|size=100px
|topic=This is an example, yo!
|text=So you just fill it in like this, then BLADOW, custom award. It's teh awesome. I didn't even know it existed. Good times. ~~~~
|textcolor=Black
}}
yields:
This is an example, yo!
So you just fill it in like this, then BLADOW, custom award. It's teh awesome. I didn't even know it existed. Good times. Lara ❤ Love 14:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
I have no objection to userfication. JoshuaZ ( talk) 15:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I understand from your comments at User talk:Keilana#Recall that you disagree with the current informal set-up for administrator recall. In short order you tagged these pages with edit summaries such as "Being bold and tagging as historical":
"Being bold" is fine but in this case it almost looks like disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Please discuss these changes on talk pages first. Over 140 admins have put themselves in this category; upon reflection, I think you'll realize probably more than a few would not agree with your unilateral decision to deprecate this program.
In the meantime, pending meaningful discussion on this matter, I have reverted your changes.
--
A. B.
(talk) 19:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Your best bet would be to talk to Enochlau for any specific questions. What we're looking for is a well-written article about the subject, that covers the basics and teaches the average user what they need to know. See the previous two articles:
Again, you should talk to Enochlau as well, though. Ral315 ( talk) 05:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Changes don't need to be discussed first. You shouldn't revert edits for that reason alone. If you have some other reason the edits should have been reverted please let me know. Otherwise I'm going to revert back. Equazcion •✗/ C • 10:48, 1 Feb 2008 (UTC)
With regard to your report here: [1], what action are you requesting? CIreland ( talk) 12:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Where can I find the oldest debates that were in Wikipedia:Votes for deletion?? This is out of curiosity and historical interest. Thanks, -- Solumeiras ( talk) 12:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The history of the VfD template is available to everyone in the history of {{ afd/old}}. this is the original version. I can't really post the entire history, though, because it's so long; the template has had substantial vandalism and edit wars over appearance, and it would take a very long time to view the whole thing. -- ais523 14:06, 1 February 2008 ( U T C)
I have approved your request for rollback. Now use the tool wisely. Happy editing! Malinaccier ( talk) 15:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I've fully protected your user page for 2 days. Malinaccier ( talk) 15:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- but is still in page history. -- Solumeiras ( talk) 17:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
A. Don't edit the closed RFAs like you did. B. For someone who denies all connection to those users...you're making it very hard for others to believe you. Metros ( talk) 18:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to close this as speedy user requested deletion, plus GFDL issues. If you want to view this at a later date then add a message to my talk page an I can undelete it.
For what its worth the article history is:
* (cur) (last) 13:58, 1 February 2008 Solumeiras (Talk | contribs | block) (13,112 bytes) (Kept for DRV) (rollback | undo) * (cur) (last) 13:36, 1 February 2008 Solumeiras (Talk | contribs | block) (13,101 bytes) (Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Solumeiras/Fish out of water comedy film. using TW) (undo) * (cur) (last) 10:45, 1 November 2007 Solumeiras (Talk | contribs | block) (11,174 bytes) (copy kept in userspace for deletion review)
-- Salix alba ( talk) 20:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Here you go, I had a feeling thats wht you wanted:-- Salix alba ( talk) 18:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
OK article plus history now restored to User:Solumeiras/Fish out of water comedy film2 let me know when you are ready for this to be deleted. -- Salix alba ( talk) 18:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I sent you an email. JoshuaZ ( talk) 00:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you attempted to close an MfD as no consensus. Avruch pointed out that an admin should really close it, but there is another problem I wanted to point out. You participated in the discussion. It is generally considered improper for any one to close an XfD discussion (things lilke AfD, RfD, TfD, CfD and MfD) in which they took part, unless it is non-controversial (like a withdrawn nomination or an invalid nomination). Please ask if you have any questions. Carcharoth ( talk) 23:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Next time you look over articles with indefinite semi-protections, look into their histories and see if there are any extenuating circumstances. I declined your Lyndon LaRouche-related unprot requests because I am not comfortable unprotecting articles that have been the focus of one Arbitration Committee request, let alone three. - Jéské ( Blah v^_^v) 01:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Might I ask why you have added all those templates to the article? Most are unnecessary, and even worse, they make the article look ugly (you have to scroll down to read the page now, as the top is blocked by the templates). Acalamari 18:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
In my modified version of TWINKLE, I created a fork of the Javascript at User:Solumeiras/twinklexfd.js. I added an option that would put my version of the AfD template onto articles - at User:Solumeiras/VfD but it isn't working! (the drop down box isn't working, try my monobook.js in your one and you'll see what I mean!)
Please can someone fix the javascript for me, and if an admin is reading this, please can they fix the part that enables me to tag pages so that I can add my VfD template. Thanks, -- Solumeiras ( talk) 20:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Solumeiras/VfD, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Solumeiras/VfD and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Solumeiras/VfD during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Metros ( talk) 22:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Why did you add the so many boilers to Ford EL Falcon? Don't you think it was overkill? The article isn't all that bad. Jason Quinn ( talk) 23:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm confused: what is wrong with the image of Mariah Carey? I checked the image's status and it's not fair-use or of unknown source, and in fact, it's the only free image we have of her. I don't understand the removal. Acalamari 19:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
...has created work for four people cleaning up after you. I don't know what point you're trying to make, but please resist the temptation to make it again. ➔ REDVEЯS has changed his plea to guilty 19:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Over the last few days you've made several current events edits about a TV show. It has been removed on each occasion as inappropriate for the current events portal. If you continue to be disruptive and add this back in, you will be blocked. Metros ( talk) 20:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey Solumeiras, I saw that you've put yourself up for editor review in consideration of a possible request for adminship. Can I suggest that maybe this might not be a great time to submit yourself for a frank review and evaluation if you are suffering mental issues such that it would necessitate warning your fellow editors? I've worked in mental health wards before and I'm just concerned about you and for you. Please, if you're suffering from health issues, do give some thought to withdrawing your evaluation for now. You could always restart it when you're feeling better. Please feel free to delete this message if you wish. Take of yourself, Solumeiras, Sarah 12:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, yes, I do remember your RfA and you told me last year about the stuff you'd put on your userpage to explain the sock issues, your other accounts etc. But, to be frank with you, I really think you have too much there about it. I think you'd be better off having only one small section with just a few lines for this sock biz, without the bolding, coloured fonts, boxes, etc. You don't need to write all that stuff, with sections and notices about socks and stuff, it just looks really peculiar, and suspicious. I think you've gone overboard. Also, you said that Iqx is similar to Lar and his wife. Have a look at Lar's and his wife's pages. They both have only one short sentence, no bolding, red font, boxes, templates, long explanations etc. Just some suggestions. Sarah 17:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed this report from AIV:
If the account needs a rename it, you'll have to talk to a 'crat, there's nothing that can be done on AIV for it. The AIV noticeboard is only for reporting clear and obvious vandalism. Sarah 18:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Sheri Staplehurst requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please take no offence. Basketball 110 the pages I've messed up completely 15:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
The core biographies were a group of roughly 200 biographies as being of the greatest important to the project. Neither of the two you listed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography#Two new core biographies needing attention - IMMEDIATELY! even remotely meets the criteria for inclusion in that group. I have removed the tags as core biographies from the article talk pages. Please more thoroughly read the criteria on the various projects' "Assessment" pages before making such determinations again. Thank you. John Carter ( talk) 20:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Well.... looks like you're not doing well at the wikipedia either!! guess I'll go back to PetitionWiki then... if you're still around! -- Ashford1982 ( talk) 11:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I was just wondering why you had tagged the Girls Aloud (talk) page as controversial. Would you be able to post on the talk page as to reason why you believe it is? Thanks. ~~ [Jam] [talk] 22:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Solumeiras ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
First of all, this is a shared account, yes. Secondly, I lied about everything on here, I admit it. The SunStar Net name WAS stolen from someone else, not joking. Thirdly, I'm going per my right to vanish!
Decline reason:
None of these are reasons to unblock you. Quite the opposite, really. ~ Riana ⁂ 09:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I haven't emailed unblock-en-l at all: that was explicitly not me.
Solumeiras ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I wasn't requesting unblock, but telling the truth. Yes, I trolled, yes we added unverifiable information. And thirdly, we stole the name off someone else. We'll go somewhere else, and anyway, Wikipedia is no fun anymore... if we agree to go would that help you??
Decline reason:
If you're not requesting unblock stop posting unblock requests. — Sarah 09:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A tag has been placed on Template:User AfD-process requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 22:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pca-logo9798.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pca13.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pca9.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pca-clip1998.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Volvo240Polar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 10:10, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Template:User inactive travel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Sockpuppet/Draft, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Girls of FHM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Girls of FHM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey2010 Talk 02:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sally the Sunflower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally the Sunflower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx ( talk) 15:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The article Pulseprogramming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Vague but overly promotional article about an artistic group of some kind. Most of the content is a catalogue of their works, it's entirely unsourced, and I can find nothing that would indicate notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Reyk
YO! 14:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Song of the Worms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song of the Worms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat ( talk) 04:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Brollys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brollys until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 ( talk) 22:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Stop-warn.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
I am editing sporadically during February. |
This is not a forum for anyone who thinks that Wikipedia is an Internet forum. It isn't a forum, if anyone's reading this!. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia anyone can edit, not an Internet forum. Don't get confused! |
Please feel free to leave messages. User:Solumeiras/Status
This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him/her feedback at an
editor review. You may comment on his/her edits at
Wikipedia:Editor review/Solumeiras. |
{{helpme}}
Please can someone find me a bot that will archive my talkpages properly?? I did cut-and-paste archiving, but I'm not sure if that was the best thing to do!
I don't know if the MiszaBot ones are working... anyone able to advise me??
If you can add it to my talk page for the archival bot that would be much appreciated! -- Solumeiras ( talk) 18:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
I'm trying to develop a variant of {{
notice}}, but unlike that one, where it changes colour depending on whether it's in the article/project namespace or article/project talk namespace, I am trying to make another template where the user can change the class according to their personal needs.
This is {{
notice}}'s current code:
{| class="{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk}} messagebox"
| {{#if:{{{header|}}}|rowspan="2"}} align="center" style="width:53px;"|[[Image:{{{image|Info {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}||non-}}talk.png}}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|25px|53px}}|Notice]]
{{#if:{{{header|}}}|
<!-- -->! Notice: {{{header}}}
<!-- -->{{!-}}
}}
|align="left"|{{{1}}}
|}
However, what I'm trying to do is create a template e.g. {{mytemplate|Your text here|standard}} or {{mytemplate|Your text here|messagebox-talk}}
How would you code this template?? I'm not really sure what I'm doing, so all advice is appreciated.
Also, how to I get my wikistress template to work properly - and to make sure it's easy to read. Wherever I put it, it makes section headers too hard to find, like above.
What should I do??
Thanks, -- Solumeiras ( talk) 13:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
I see that you know a bit about these episodes - do you remember 2 un named episodes, as far as i'm aware (and from what I posses) there only was one. -- 88.108.50.63 ( talk) 20:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Response from: JM62
over the recent months, there has been alot of confusion over the early episodes of police, camera, action!. the main reason why the early un-named episode has not been shown is because itv4 do not have the broadcasting rights to certain episodes from each series. there was actually many answers as to this, but i have been looking in the wiki archive and have found the answers. the later episode, police, camera action! '95 was later renamed safety last by producers soon after it's early transmission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.199.142 ( talk) 11:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
$hfmig s, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
$hfmig s.
Magioladitis (
talk) 21:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 04:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
{{award2
|border=solid
|borderwidth=2px
|color=khaki
|image=Bad Title Example.png
|size=100px
|topic=This is an example, yo!
|text=So you just fill it in like this, then BLADOW, custom award. It's teh awesome. I didn't even know it existed. Good times. ~~~~
|textcolor=Black
}}
yields:
This is an example, yo!
So you just fill it in like this, then BLADOW, custom award. It's teh awesome. I didn't even know it existed. Good times. Lara ❤ Love 14:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
I have no objection to userfication. JoshuaZ ( talk) 15:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I understand from your comments at User talk:Keilana#Recall that you disagree with the current informal set-up for administrator recall. In short order you tagged these pages with edit summaries such as "Being bold and tagging as historical":
"Being bold" is fine but in this case it almost looks like disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Please discuss these changes on talk pages first. Over 140 admins have put themselves in this category; upon reflection, I think you'll realize probably more than a few would not agree with your unilateral decision to deprecate this program.
In the meantime, pending meaningful discussion on this matter, I have reverted your changes.
--
A. B.
(talk) 19:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Your best bet would be to talk to Enochlau for any specific questions. What we're looking for is a well-written article about the subject, that covers the basics and teaches the average user what they need to know. See the previous two articles:
Again, you should talk to Enochlau as well, though. Ral315 ( talk) 05:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Changes don't need to be discussed first. You shouldn't revert edits for that reason alone. If you have some other reason the edits should have been reverted please let me know. Otherwise I'm going to revert back. Equazcion •✗/ C • 10:48, 1 Feb 2008 (UTC)
With regard to your report here: [1], what action are you requesting? CIreland ( talk) 12:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Where can I find the oldest debates that were in Wikipedia:Votes for deletion?? This is out of curiosity and historical interest. Thanks, -- Solumeiras ( talk) 12:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The history of the VfD template is available to everyone in the history of {{ afd/old}}. this is the original version. I can't really post the entire history, though, because it's so long; the template has had substantial vandalism and edit wars over appearance, and it would take a very long time to view the whole thing. -- ais523 14:06, 1 February 2008 ( U T C)
I have approved your request for rollback. Now use the tool wisely. Happy editing! Malinaccier ( talk) 15:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I've fully protected your user page for 2 days. Malinaccier ( talk) 15:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- but is still in page history. -- Solumeiras ( talk) 17:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
A. Don't edit the closed RFAs like you did. B. For someone who denies all connection to those users...you're making it very hard for others to believe you. Metros ( talk) 18:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to close this as speedy user requested deletion, plus GFDL issues. If you want to view this at a later date then add a message to my talk page an I can undelete it.
For what its worth the article history is:
* (cur) (last) 13:58, 1 February 2008 Solumeiras (Talk | contribs | block) (13,112 bytes) (Kept for DRV) (rollback | undo) * (cur) (last) 13:36, 1 February 2008 Solumeiras (Talk | contribs | block) (13,101 bytes) (Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Solumeiras/Fish out of water comedy film. using TW) (undo) * (cur) (last) 10:45, 1 November 2007 Solumeiras (Talk | contribs | block) (11,174 bytes) (copy kept in userspace for deletion review)
-- Salix alba ( talk) 20:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Here you go, I had a feeling thats wht you wanted:-- Salix alba ( talk) 18:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
OK article plus history now restored to User:Solumeiras/Fish out of water comedy film2 let me know when you are ready for this to be deleted. -- Salix alba ( talk) 18:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I sent you an email. JoshuaZ ( talk) 00:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you attempted to close an MfD as no consensus. Avruch pointed out that an admin should really close it, but there is another problem I wanted to point out. You participated in the discussion. It is generally considered improper for any one to close an XfD discussion (things lilke AfD, RfD, TfD, CfD and MfD) in which they took part, unless it is non-controversial (like a withdrawn nomination or an invalid nomination). Please ask if you have any questions. Carcharoth ( talk) 23:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Next time you look over articles with indefinite semi-protections, look into their histories and see if there are any extenuating circumstances. I declined your Lyndon LaRouche-related unprot requests because I am not comfortable unprotecting articles that have been the focus of one Arbitration Committee request, let alone three. - Jéské ( Blah v^_^v) 01:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Might I ask why you have added all those templates to the article? Most are unnecessary, and even worse, they make the article look ugly (you have to scroll down to read the page now, as the top is blocked by the templates). Acalamari 18:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
In my modified version of TWINKLE, I created a fork of the Javascript at User:Solumeiras/twinklexfd.js. I added an option that would put my version of the AfD template onto articles - at User:Solumeiras/VfD but it isn't working! (the drop down box isn't working, try my monobook.js in your one and you'll see what I mean!)
Please can someone fix the javascript for me, and if an admin is reading this, please can they fix the part that enables me to tag pages so that I can add my VfD template. Thanks, -- Solumeiras ( talk) 20:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Solumeiras/VfD, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Solumeiras/VfD and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Solumeiras/VfD during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Metros ( talk) 22:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Why did you add the so many boilers to Ford EL Falcon? Don't you think it was overkill? The article isn't all that bad. Jason Quinn ( talk) 23:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm confused: what is wrong with the image of Mariah Carey? I checked the image's status and it's not fair-use or of unknown source, and in fact, it's the only free image we have of her. I don't understand the removal. Acalamari 19:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
...has created work for four people cleaning up after you. I don't know what point you're trying to make, but please resist the temptation to make it again. ➔ REDVEЯS has changed his plea to guilty 19:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Over the last few days you've made several current events edits about a TV show. It has been removed on each occasion as inappropriate for the current events portal. If you continue to be disruptive and add this back in, you will be blocked. Metros ( talk) 20:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey Solumeiras, I saw that you've put yourself up for editor review in consideration of a possible request for adminship. Can I suggest that maybe this might not be a great time to submit yourself for a frank review and evaluation if you are suffering mental issues such that it would necessitate warning your fellow editors? I've worked in mental health wards before and I'm just concerned about you and for you. Please, if you're suffering from health issues, do give some thought to withdrawing your evaluation for now. You could always restart it when you're feeling better. Please feel free to delete this message if you wish. Take of yourself, Solumeiras, Sarah 12:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, yes, I do remember your RfA and you told me last year about the stuff you'd put on your userpage to explain the sock issues, your other accounts etc. But, to be frank with you, I really think you have too much there about it. I think you'd be better off having only one small section with just a few lines for this sock biz, without the bolding, coloured fonts, boxes, etc. You don't need to write all that stuff, with sections and notices about socks and stuff, it just looks really peculiar, and suspicious. I think you've gone overboard. Also, you said that Iqx is similar to Lar and his wife. Have a look at Lar's and his wife's pages. They both have only one short sentence, no bolding, red font, boxes, templates, long explanations etc. Just some suggestions. Sarah 17:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed this report from AIV:
If the account needs a rename it, you'll have to talk to a 'crat, there's nothing that can be done on AIV for it. The AIV noticeboard is only for reporting clear and obvious vandalism. Sarah 18:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Sheri Staplehurst requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please take no offence. Basketball 110 the pages I've messed up completely 15:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
The core biographies were a group of roughly 200 biographies as being of the greatest important to the project. Neither of the two you listed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography#Two new core biographies needing attention - IMMEDIATELY! even remotely meets the criteria for inclusion in that group. I have removed the tags as core biographies from the article talk pages. Please more thoroughly read the criteria on the various projects' "Assessment" pages before making such determinations again. Thank you. John Carter ( talk) 20:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Well.... looks like you're not doing well at the wikipedia either!! guess I'll go back to PetitionWiki then... if you're still around! -- Ashford1982 ( talk) 11:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I was just wondering why you had tagged the Girls Aloud (talk) page as controversial. Would you be able to post on the talk page as to reason why you believe it is? Thanks. ~~ [Jam] [talk] 22:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Solumeiras ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
First of all, this is a shared account, yes. Secondly, I lied about everything on here, I admit it. The SunStar Net name WAS stolen from someone else, not joking. Thirdly, I'm going per my right to vanish!
Decline reason:
None of these are reasons to unblock you. Quite the opposite, really. ~ Riana ⁂ 09:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I haven't emailed unblock-en-l at all: that was explicitly not me.
Solumeiras ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I wasn't requesting unblock, but telling the truth. Yes, I trolled, yes we added unverifiable information. And thirdly, we stole the name off someone else. We'll go somewhere else, and anyway, Wikipedia is no fun anymore... if we agree to go would that help you??
Decline reason:
If you're not requesting unblock stop posting unblock requests. — Sarah 09:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A tag has been placed on Template:User AfD-process requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 22:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pca-logo9798.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pca13.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pca9.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pca-clip1998.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Volvo240Polar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 10:10, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Template:User inactive travel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Sockpuppet/Draft, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Girls of FHM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Girls of FHM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey2010 Talk 02:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sally the Sunflower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally the Sunflower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx ( talk) 15:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
The article Pulseprogramming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Vague but overly promotional article about an artistic group of some kind. Most of the content is a catalogue of their works, it's entirely unsourced, and I can find nothing that would indicate notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Reyk
YO! 14:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Song of the Worms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song of the Worms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat ( talk) 04:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Brollys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brollys until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 ( talk) 22:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Stop-warn.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)