Hello, Shemtov613, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Marquardtika ( talk) 18:28, 27 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Earle D. Litzenberger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin ( talk) 13:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for creating Earle D. Litzenberger.

User:Path slopu while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for creating article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 14:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, Shemtov613,

Thanks for creating Dereck J. Hogan! I edit here too, under the username Domdeparis and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

this article fails WP:NBIO. Ambassadors are not considered inherently notable especially one to such a small country. Please find the neccessary sources or this article may be deleted

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Domdeparis}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dom from Paris ( talk) 16:46, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to American Dream Meadowlands, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. In addition, there is already mention of the kosher food hall directly above where you added a repeated mention of it.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 15:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC) reply

RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC) reply

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. A belated WELCOME to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to American Dream Meadowlands. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation. there are citations for the ski slope already in the article, and they do not mention they name that you gave. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 15:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey, thanks for creating articles for D.C. Superior Court judges. Great work! Marquardtika ( talk) 03:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi - I volunteer at WP:NPP, and just had a look at your article on Michael Kenny O'Keefe - it's neutrally written, but I'm not sure the sources currently in the article (or those I could find with a Google search) would support notability via WP:GNG. Per RSP, Ballotpedia seems to be less-than-universally-regarded as RS, and the other sources cited (or that I could find) give the subject scant coverage. Is there an SNG for judges that I'm overlooking, or some other claim to GNG that I've missed? I wanted to reach out to you before nominating to AfD, but unless I can identify a clear case for notability that's the route I have to take. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 23:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi, @ Girth Summit:, thanks for reviewing the article. As for your concerns, judges on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia meet Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians and judges guidelines. Please also see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States courts and judges#D.C. Superior Court as pointed out by @ Marquardtika:, @ 1990'sguy: + others and there was a consensus that articles for the judges should indeed be added. I replaced the Ballotpedia source with a source from NBC and added some additional sources to the article. Please note that many publishers like the Washington Post, in articles, refer to the judge as Michael O'Keefe without his middle name, Kenny. Shemtov613 ( talk) 07:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Shemtov613, OK, cool - yes, having re-read WP:NPOLITICIAN, I agree that it would cover this individual (I forgot that it covered judges as well as politicians). I've removed the tag and marked as reviewed. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 10:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Girth Summit: Awesome. Thank you :) Shemtov613 ( talk) 15:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello Shemtov613,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Snickers2686 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, John Leonard Badalamenti for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, John L. Badalamenti.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Snickers2686}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Snickers2686 ( talk) 21:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Snickers2686: Yup, I oversaw his current page. Thank you Shemtov613 ( talk) 21:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Snickers2686: I changed John Leonard Badalamenti from being an article to redirecting his full name to middle initial page as per WP:BLAR and WP:ATD-R. What’s your take now on it’s deletion?

Wow! You were there?! I just watched a livestream in my home in Jerusalem. It was so inspiring! Yoninah ( talk) 23:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Yoninah: Yup! It was a magnificant event! The picture was taken during dancing, right after the Siyum. I'll also be attending the Dirshu siyum, God willing. Talking about Dirshu, I just created a stub. It's past 2am in Jerusalem, but when you have a chance, please help exanding the article. Thank you! Shemtov613 ( talk) 00:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Great minds think alike! I was thinking of starting a page and posting it on DYK on the main page on February 1. I have some articles that I clipped from Hamodia to use. I'll try to work on it within the 7-day time frame. Yoninah ( talk) 00:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC) reply

That's awesome! לילה טוב. Shemtov613 ( talk) 00:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC) reply

On 4 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Big Snow American Dream, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New Jersey's Big Snow American Dream became the first indoor ski park in North America when it opened last month? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Big Snow American Dream. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Big Snow American Dream), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi again. I wonder if you could take a picture of the big Dirshu banners hanging outside the Prudential Center when you go to the Siyum, preferably in daytime? You'll probably also have pictures inside the hall. We could use all these to illustrate the article. I'll post a picture of the Dirshu banners hanging outside Binyanei HaUma at the 2012 English-language Dirshu siyum, which I attended. Thanks, Yoninah ( talk) 17:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Yoninah: Not sure, though I believe that the Dirshu siyum will be at night. Will definitely be taking and uploading the pictures. Will aim to get one of the banner though I'll let you know about daylight... Btw, amazing job on the article! Shemtov613 ( talk) 01:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks. Yoninah ( talk) 02:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi,

First off, kudos to you for all your heard work regarding the judges of the Superior Court of D.C.. I had a question about your list though, are we including former judges and/or senior judges in the list as well? Snickers2686 ( talk)

@ Snickers2686: Thank you. Yes, we should definitely be adding senior judges to the list. As for former judges, I'm not so sure. I'd love to hear what other editors (@ Marquardtika:) answer on the page's talk page. Shemtov613 ( talk) 23:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC) reply

On 9 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dirshu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that participants in one of Dirshu's intensive study programs are tested on their knowledge of all 2,711 pages of the Talmud at the end of the seven-and-a-half-year Daf Yomi cycle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dirshu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Dirshu), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Awesome photo! I was really disappointed that it wasn't live-streamed like the MetLife event was. Hopefully something will be uploaded to YouTube afterwards, as their Paris and Manchester events were. Was it great? Best, Yoninah ( talk) 00:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Yoninah: Still ongoing for another half hour. It is actually a massive event, beats the other siyum 100:1! From production, energetic speeches and concert-like music! Harav Hofstadter (in addition to the unbelievable Dirshu movement) has remodeled how a Torah event can look like! Shemtov613 ( talk) 03:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Magnificent video presentation live now in Yiddish. A must watch! Shemtov613 ( talk) 03:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi, you have been adding the short description "Babylonian Jewish Talmudist" to pages of rabbis (tannaim and amoraim) who were not Babylonian, and some of whom lived in the period of the Tannaim, where IMHO the term "Talmudist" does not apply. Could you check the biographies to make sure "Babylonian Jewish Talmudist" is accurate before adding it to more pages? Thanks! Ar2332 ( talk) 18:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Ar2332: One mistake on Judah bar Ilai. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Shemtov613 ( talk) 18:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi, I don't know much about these short descriptions, but calling a Hasidic Rebbe a "rabbi" doesn't seem complete enough. These are leaders of thousands of Hasidim. Yoninah ( talk) 17:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Yoninah: There aren't any set rules for how to write the short description. It's goal (as of now) is for a brief introduction to the reader on the subject of the page. With that being said, feel free to change it to Grand Rabbi etc. Shemtov613 ( talk) 18:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Yoninah: Try this awesome tool: Wikipedia:Shortdesc helper. Shemtov613 ( talk) 18:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks, I'll look into it. Yoninah ( talk) 18:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Re this edit, do not use the word murder when there is no murder conviction. This is a serious violation of BLP policy. I have also removed the word "white" since sources have not said this case has a race element. ― Mandruss  ☎ 05:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for taking care of creating the articles! Do you mind adding more content to them? Otherwise, they might be accidentally deleted by someone who thinks they're not notable subjects. – JocularJellyfish ^Talk _Contribs 21:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

@ JocularJellyfish: Sure thing, Career is important yet the most time consuming part of the article. Hope to get to it soon. Shemtov613 ( talk) 21:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Sounds good! – JocularJellyfish ^Talk _Contribs 22:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi there,

I hope you're well - and a belated yom tov to you! My name is Scott, and I work with a project called SCALES, out of Northwestern University ( https://scales-okn.org). We recently received a grant from the National Science Foundation to create a national resource for opening up access to court records and increasing the transparency of the justice system. Here's a paper we published recently in Science discussing the goals of our project, as well as a promotional video.

As it seems you are a recent contributor to the WikiProject for US courts and judges, I wanted to reach out and inquire into how the SCALES platform might assist in your writing and editing work. We have a great deal of data and metadata about judges & lawyers in the federal court system that could improve the stubs and B-/C-class articles in this space (something I'm personally excited about, since in my brief teenage Wikipedia-editing heyday I was drawn to working with stubs and new articles). And in general, I think the SCALES data could be a powerful tool for empowering citizens to understand the judiciary and its impact on the country, a priority that I imagine the Wikipedia community shares.

Let me know if you're interested in talking further and helping us understand how we can work with you; I'm happy to talk via email as well. Thanks for your time!

All best,

Scott — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pasta Patron ( talk • contribs) 18:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John P. Howard III, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence M. Andrews until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niv Sultan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niv Sultan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon ( talk) 02:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan T. McAllister is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan T. McAllister until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun ( talk) 16:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saritha Komatireddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saritha Komatireddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun ( talk) 02:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dirk B. Paloutzian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk B. Paloutzian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun ( talk) 00:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David C. Woll Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David C. Woll Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun ( talk) 14:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brenda M. Saiz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda M. Saiz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun ( talk) 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply