This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | → | Archive 40 |
Hi. Can you please take a look at the following: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. According to the histories I provided, the IPs appear to be a dynamic hopper which geolocates to the University of South Florida. I believe that it appears to have issues with WP:NPOV, WP:INUNIVERSE, WP:N and WP:OR. I think we should file an WP:SPI if its necessary, but do you have any thoughts about this matter? Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 19:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
You deserve this. Thanks for giving me this advice Bsliangel ( talk) 16:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks for the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimono111 ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Thanks for the message. This is my gift for you Bsliangel ( talk) 16:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC) |
Thank you for helping on the article fantasy forest. If you could, please help on improving it. And I was also wondering how to submit the draft.
Bsliangel (
talk) 20:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Bsliangel
Bsliangel (
talk) 20:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
How do I submit my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsliangel ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you think you could keep helping me on this? Link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimono111 ( talk • contribs) 15:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brogue (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogue (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Anar chyte 00:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sergecross, if you get a chance, could you take a look at edits I recently made to the Meghan Trainor "early life” section? These were edits originally added by Lips Are Movin, which I trimmed and copy edited. I took the time to do so because her recent efforts were mass reverted [7], [8], [9] and I’m concerned multiple editors are being run off the Meghan Trainor suite of articles due to the ongoing battleground and being accused of “fancruft” (But who else but a fan is going to bother reading all the sources involved in writing a good comprehensive early life section?) I seem to recall you had a moderate position on that article in regards to the past concerns regarding length and bloat, acknowledging bloat, but also thinking there was music snobbery at play. If you get a chance, would you mind taking a look and seeing if you think this needs further trimmed? [10]-- BoboMeowCat ( talk) 23:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
That indefintetly-blocked user Dragonron is back again, this time as Looks nice guy! I'm back ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Hoo! rock me back! ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Just wanted to inform you about this in advance. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 07:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you replaced a header with a semicolon in this edit. This generates broken HTML and causes some browsers, such as screen readers for the blind, to have trouble. Semicolons should only be use for definition lists, not for pseudo-headers. It's not a huge deal, but I've been trying to get rid of all the errant semicolons on Wikipedia lately, and it's a pretty huge task. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 16:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
On this page, we're nearing the template transclusion limits apparently, and this will definitely be a problem once it happens. We've already had to remove navigational templates which are normally placed at the bottom of such articles, for instance {{ Video game lists by platform}} and {{ PlayStation}}.
Would it be a good idea to replace all instances of {{dts|date}}
with plaintext dates (i.e. replacing {{dts|2015|02|25}}
with "February 25, 2015") to alleviate this issue? The majority of transclusions on this page are automatic date format conversions, and although such a change would make future editing/updates to the page slightly more tedious (and the raw wikicode more messy), we can have the page functioning normally. This can be easily done with an automated script, by the way. --
benlisquare
T•
C•
E 04:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
An anonymous user keeps re-adding his (badly written and formatted) version on the SCE Japan Studio article. It doesn't seem neutral and it has TM symbols for every game, so since I've reverted him around 3 times, I'm proposing that the article be protected for a bit, if possible, thanks. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 20:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm sure you remember Tripple-ddd, the editor that has had multiple people reverting his mass changes on Sega related articles. Well, recently he states that since he "Hasn't got a response on the talk page...", that somehow gives him the right to continue to ignore what he's been told to stop doing. If you just take a gander at the Sega article talk page, you will see the massive walls of texts dating back months in which we try to help he see what he continues to do wrong, so he's wrong when he says this and is just edit warring at this point. We're all getting tired of babysitting him and reverting his edits that clearly go against consensus set on that talk page, so I'm wondering if something else can be done? ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 00:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Question, I'm an old WP user, as you can tell by my account, but you were proposing deleting the section showing that the xbox one game console was using deceptive tactics to market their game device, why? I mean I feel that is a major important milestone, if nothing else it would be like mentioning Microsoft without mentioning the misteps of Windows ME. Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! ( talk) 03:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Strictly for the record, why is Gawker media considered reliable, when they are being sued in the the United States for behavior that was slanderous, Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! ( talk) 04:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I've just baked a batch of brownies (OK, Sainsbury's did; I just bought them! =D) and thought of you; hope you enjoy them, they're nut free. Kandi well 22:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC) |
I was checking the new pages for video games and I noticed that two articles, Tom Kudirka and 2015, Inc., were made by User:Tomkudirka, which has me thinking there's a COI on these articles. Thoughts? GamerPro64 21:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Are you the paige owner of rise — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wonderdisk 93 ( talk • contribs) 23:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Do not delete my page if you find an error, correct it. If you want to know more about me Google my name.
Tom Kudirka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomkudirka ( talk • contribs) 03:58, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page Sin: Wages of Sin? You have it redirected to the SiN page. Wages of Sin is the mission pack for the game SiN. They are not the same game. What gives you the right to delete a cult classic? You can still buy this game on EBay. Did you research the game at all? The guys who made Sin: Wages of Sin worked for 2015, Inc. their next game was Medal of Honor: Allied Assault. The team left and became Infinity Ward. Have you heard of them? Their next game was Call of Duty. Put back up the page Sin: Wages of Sin. Clearly you never heard of that game. But anyone who truly knows video games understands its significance to FPS games. Underdoger ( talk) 17:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Did I do any research on how encyclopedia articles are supposed to be written? I didn't create the article. We just noticed the article as gone. If the page has not been referenced in 8 years then put it back up and I will add updated references. Underdoger ( talk) 17:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't appreciate your attitude. Very appropriate for a Wikipedia administrator. Who do you think your talking to? I'm 52 years old professional businessman whose been in the video games industry for over 15 years creating hit games like Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and assembling the team that became Infinity Ward. There's not going to be opposition and scrutiny because I will adhere to the guidelines under Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. So there will be no conflict of interest either. And there are plenty of video game developers with biographies out there. I don't have to explain myself to you at all. Wikipedia Administrators should not speak to anyone this way. Underdoger ( talk) 18:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Please calm down and assume good faith. To ensure quality, the article needs to be neutral and have reliable sources. Before the article is restored, we need the reliable sources first. Right now, you have not guaranteed that after the article is restored you'll go and improve it. Per the Wikipedia policy WP:BURDEN, you yourself need to ensure the content is verifiable before it's visible to readers. On the flipside, we need to ensure that the article is neutral. This means that any material added should not be cherry-picked to advance a position. Hypothetically, if the game has both positive and negative reviews and you choose to provide only positive reviews, that's not maintaining neutrality. So what Serge is saying is that because you're closely involved with the subject matter this bias could be present (not saying it will be) and thus will face more opposition from other editors. Please don't take Serge's comments the wrong way. He is simply acting in the best interests of Wikipedia. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 18:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I understand and agree with you ThomasO1989. The SiN: Wages of Sin article must have reliable sources and must be neutral. I just don't agree if an article is old to simply delete it. If an article in an encyclopedia is old should it be deleted? I did not write the Wages of Sin article and I don't remember everything in the article. I guarantee that after the article is restored I will improve it. Thank you for your cooperation. Tomkudirka ( talk) 14:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you ferret, you're a good man. Tomkudirka ( talk) 14:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the edit request in place at PC Master Race? I quickly scanned the policies, didn't seem to be anything against asking ;) No offense at all taken if you decline. :) -- ferret ( talk) 00:13, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | → | Archive 40 |
Hi. Can you please take a look at the following: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. According to the histories I provided, the IPs appear to be a dynamic hopper which geolocates to the University of South Florida. I believe that it appears to have issues with WP:NPOV, WP:INUNIVERSE, WP:N and WP:OR. I think we should file an WP:SPI if its necessary, but do you have any thoughts about this matter? Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 19:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
You deserve this. Thanks for giving me this advice Bsliangel ( talk) 16:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks for the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimono111 ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Thanks for the message. This is my gift for you Bsliangel ( talk) 16:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC) |
Thank you for helping on the article fantasy forest. If you could, please help on improving it. And I was also wondering how to submit the draft.
Bsliangel (
talk) 20:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Bsliangel
Bsliangel (
talk) 20:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
How do I submit my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsliangel ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you think you could keep helping me on this? Link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimono111 ( talk • contribs) 15:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brogue (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogue (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Anar chyte 00:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sergecross, if you get a chance, could you take a look at edits I recently made to the Meghan Trainor "early life” section? These were edits originally added by Lips Are Movin, which I trimmed and copy edited. I took the time to do so because her recent efforts were mass reverted [7], [8], [9] and I’m concerned multiple editors are being run off the Meghan Trainor suite of articles due to the ongoing battleground and being accused of “fancruft” (But who else but a fan is going to bother reading all the sources involved in writing a good comprehensive early life section?) I seem to recall you had a moderate position on that article in regards to the past concerns regarding length and bloat, acknowledging bloat, but also thinking there was music snobbery at play. If you get a chance, would you mind taking a look and seeing if you think this needs further trimmed? [10]-- BoboMeowCat ( talk) 23:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
That indefintetly-blocked user Dragonron is back again, this time as Looks nice guy! I'm back ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Hoo! rock me back! ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Just wanted to inform you about this in advance. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 07:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you replaced a header with a semicolon in this edit. This generates broken HTML and causes some browsers, such as screen readers for the blind, to have trouble. Semicolons should only be use for definition lists, not for pseudo-headers. It's not a huge deal, but I've been trying to get rid of all the errant semicolons on Wikipedia lately, and it's a pretty huge task. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 16:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
On this page, we're nearing the template transclusion limits apparently, and this will definitely be a problem once it happens. We've already had to remove navigational templates which are normally placed at the bottom of such articles, for instance {{ Video game lists by platform}} and {{ PlayStation}}.
Would it be a good idea to replace all instances of {{dts|date}}
with plaintext dates (i.e. replacing {{dts|2015|02|25}}
with "February 25, 2015") to alleviate this issue? The majority of transclusions on this page are automatic date format conversions, and although such a change would make future editing/updates to the page slightly more tedious (and the raw wikicode more messy), we can have the page functioning normally. This can be easily done with an automated script, by the way. --
benlisquare
T•
C•
E 04:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
An anonymous user keeps re-adding his (badly written and formatted) version on the SCE Japan Studio article. It doesn't seem neutral and it has TM symbols for every game, so since I've reverted him around 3 times, I'm proposing that the article be protected for a bit, if possible, thanks. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 20:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm sure you remember Tripple-ddd, the editor that has had multiple people reverting his mass changes on Sega related articles. Well, recently he states that since he "Hasn't got a response on the talk page...", that somehow gives him the right to continue to ignore what he's been told to stop doing. If you just take a gander at the Sega article talk page, you will see the massive walls of texts dating back months in which we try to help he see what he continues to do wrong, so he's wrong when he says this and is just edit warring at this point. We're all getting tired of babysitting him and reverting his edits that clearly go against consensus set on that talk page, so I'm wondering if something else can be done? ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 00:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Question, I'm an old WP user, as you can tell by my account, but you were proposing deleting the section showing that the xbox one game console was using deceptive tactics to market their game device, why? I mean I feel that is a major important milestone, if nothing else it would be like mentioning Microsoft without mentioning the misteps of Windows ME. Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! ( talk) 03:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Strictly for the record, why is Gawker media considered reliable, when they are being sued in the the United States for behavior that was slanderous, Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! ( talk) 04:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I've just baked a batch of brownies (OK, Sainsbury's did; I just bought them! =D) and thought of you; hope you enjoy them, they're nut free. Kandi well 22:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC) |
I was checking the new pages for video games and I noticed that two articles, Tom Kudirka and 2015, Inc., were made by User:Tomkudirka, which has me thinking there's a COI on these articles. Thoughts? GamerPro64 21:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Are you the paige owner of rise — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wonderdisk 93 ( talk • contribs) 23:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Do not delete my page if you find an error, correct it. If you want to know more about me Google my name.
Tom Kudirka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomkudirka ( talk • contribs) 03:58, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page Sin: Wages of Sin? You have it redirected to the SiN page. Wages of Sin is the mission pack for the game SiN. They are not the same game. What gives you the right to delete a cult classic? You can still buy this game on EBay. Did you research the game at all? The guys who made Sin: Wages of Sin worked for 2015, Inc. their next game was Medal of Honor: Allied Assault. The team left and became Infinity Ward. Have you heard of them? Their next game was Call of Duty. Put back up the page Sin: Wages of Sin. Clearly you never heard of that game. But anyone who truly knows video games understands its significance to FPS games. Underdoger ( talk) 17:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Did I do any research on how encyclopedia articles are supposed to be written? I didn't create the article. We just noticed the article as gone. If the page has not been referenced in 8 years then put it back up and I will add updated references. Underdoger ( talk) 17:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't appreciate your attitude. Very appropriate for a Wikipedia administrator. Who do you think your talking to? I'm 52 years old professional businessman whose been in the video games industry for over 15 years creating hit games like Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and assembling the team that became Infinity Ward. There's not going to be opposition and scrutiny because I will adhere to the guidelines under Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. So there will be no conflict of interest either. And there are plenty of video game developers with biographies out there. I don't have to explain myself to you at all. Wikipedia Administrators should not speak to anyone this way. Underdoger ( talk) 18:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Please calm down and assume good faith. To ensure quality, the article needs to be neutral and have reliable sources. Before the article is restored, we need the reliable sources first. Right now, you have not guaranteed that after the article is restored you'll go and improve it. Per the Wikipedia policy WP:BURDEN, you yourself need to ensure the content is verifiable before it's visible to readers. On the flipside, we need to ensure that the article is neutral. This means that any material added should not be cherry-picked to advance a position. Hypothetically, if the game has both positive and negative reviews and you choose to provide only positive reviews, that's not maintaining neutrality. So what Serge is saying is that because you're closely involved with the subject matter this bias could be present (not saying it will be) and thus will face more opposition from other editors. Please don't take Serge's comments the wrong way. He is simply acting in the best interests of Wikipedia. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 18:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I understand and agree with you ThomasO1989. The SiN: Wages of Sin article must have reliable sources and must be neutral. I just don't agree if an article is old to simply delete it. If an article in an encyclopedia is old should it be deleted? I did not write the Wages of Sin article and I don't remember everything in the article. I guarantee that after the article is restored I will improve it. Thank you for your cooperation. Tomkudirka ( talk) 14:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you ferret, you're a good man. Tomkudirka ( talk) 14:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the edit request in place at PC Master Race? I quickly scanned the policies, didn't seem to be anything against asking ;) No offense at all taken if you decline. :) -- ferret ( talk) 00:13, 3 July 2015 (UTC)