It seems that you are correct! - ClemMcGann ( talk) 23:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{ Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{ User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Regarding this edit of yours, I've opened a discussion at the relevant TP. The source appears unclear on some issues you raised to which you may care to respond. RashersTierney ( talk) 00:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Rudolf Hess, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy Island ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply

There is a W. Stöwer image that would be great for the German_submarine_Deutschland article, relating to her 1916 Baltimore mission.

IMAGE: http://www.cityofart.net/bship/smu_deutschland.jpg
FROM: http://www.cityofart.net/bship/u_boat_gallery.html#depictions
ASSOCIATED TEXT: "Here she is seen on return to Bremen in 1916, laden with supplies valued at over $1M from German businessmen in Baltimore."

I don't have upload access, and could also use this image relating to Stöwer. This image is clearly PD, the artist being deceased 70+ years. If you could upload this, please let me know on this talk page. (I am temporarily using IP: 98.26.28.41 ( talk) 00:42, 29 April 2012 (UTC)) reply

Another good PD image from Stöwer relating to SM_U-9
IMAGE: http://www.art-prints-on-demand.com/kunst/willy_stoewer/019937-1.jpg
FROM: http://www.art-prints-on-demand.com/a/willy-stoewer.html
ASSOCIATED TEXT: Willy Stöwer - Die Ankunft von U-9 in Wihelmshaven (The arrival of U-9 in Wihelmshaven)
~Eric F 98.26.28.41 ( talk) 01:20, 29 April 2012 (UTC) (talk) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Junkers Ju 390, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ULTRA ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maria Margarethe Kirch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sommerfeld and Christopher Arnold ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Type 4 Ka-Tsu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amphibious ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:32, 8 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello, Please, Who is Count Mere in the text: "a letter from Count Mere, who, about to be executed, commended his wife and children to the care of the doctor."? Thanks.-- Parsedan ( talk) 16:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC) reply

All that is known is that he was an aristocratic friend of the Doctor. Salmanazar ( talk) 20:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I think he was Comte de Méré-- Parsedan ( talk) 20:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Yes, it is definitely the same person, so I have amended the article accordingly. Thanks! Salmanazar ( talk) 21:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Rothermere, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Evening News and Sunday Mail ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Get some manners you rude little man.-- Kitchen Knife ( talk) 21:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Stick it, tosspot. I'm watching you. Salmanazar ( talk) 21:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC) reply

They where justified in the edits it is you that has no justification for your edits or you patronizing comments on my talk page. I suggest you read the Wikipedia guides yourself before I report you for vandalism. Don't contact me again and do not vandalise be reading unreferenced claims.-- Kitchen Knife ( talk) 21:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Your so-called "edit" rendered a previously well-formed paragraph ungrammatical and nonsensical. How is that not vandalism? Report me if you like, you ill-natured troll; unlike you I don't have an extensive history of poorly-executed edits and abuse of other editors. Salmanazar ( talk) 21:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi there. I saw that you recently added two links to Hardware (film). The problem is that these links illegally reproduce a copyrighted comic strip in its entirety. As such, they are unusable as citations in Wikipedia. Please do not restore them. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 18:29, 22 July 2015 (UTC) reply

On the EKR page there's a passage that says "based on B. Chertok's elaboration of the German R-13 cruise missile design". This is linked to the R-13 (missile) page, which is about a Soviet SLBM. I assume this link is wrong, but I can't find anything about any German R-13. Any pointers? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 22:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello Maury. Thanks for the heads-up. Apologies for the delay in replying. It looks like someone tried to be helpful by linking to the Soviet R-13... which is definitely not right. The R-13 (aka G-1M) in question was a German proposal to augment an R-10 rocket with the A-4's propulsion system. Salmanazar ( talk) 12:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Analog jan 1975.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Salmanazar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Salmanazar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

There is an RfC at an article you have edited, to which you may wish to add your input: Talk:American Flagg!#Request for comment. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 18:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The article Luck (short story) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Java Hurricane 12:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC) reply