Hello, Rylee Amelia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Cheers, atque supra! Fake scientist 8000 23:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the message! I've had an account for just over a month now, but it's nice seeing conversations like this. Rylee Amelia ( talk) 00:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Ah, I see. Nevertheless, I saw you hadn't been welcomed, and wanted to do it to start this talk page on a pleasant note. :) Cheers, atque supra! Fake scientist 8000 00:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Rylee Amelia ... Glad to see that you're editing about Indiana topics. If you're near Indianapolis, you could come hang out with the Indiana user group someday at a meetup. In any case, keep up the good work and have fun! -- Jaireeodell ( talk) 13:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN. YouTube and Imdb cannot be used as sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ve'ondre Mitchell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@T.C.G. [talk] 07:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Rylee Amelia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! @T.C.G. [talk] 07:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ve'ondre Mitchell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba ( talk) 16:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ve'ondre Mitchell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes ( Talk) ( Contribs) ( Articles) 17:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Days of Girlhood, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jonathan Deamer ( talk) 21:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I have done some constructive and helpful edits to your article draft Draft:Ve'ondre Mitchell. Please try submitting it again. 96.43.189.203 ( talk) 18:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Heya! Unlike the IP address who commented recently I would suggest adding a few more sources to your draft on Ve'ondre Mitchell - although I unfortunately don't have enough time to add them in, I've found some sources for you to consider! As advance warning, none of these are listed as known reliable sources, but to my eyes they look pretty good. If you're unsure, please feel free to make use of the reliable sources noticeboard - they love checking out sources. Interviews are not usually counted as reliable sources, but you can use them for biographical information like age, place of birth, etc.

HeraldNet: [1]

Paper: [2]

Kiro: [3]

Teen Vogue: [4]

It might also be that it's too soon for this article to make it out of draft format, but if that's the case then keep an eye out for more sources and when the time comes you'll be ready. Best of luck and happy editing! StartGrammarTime ( talk) 08:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply