Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
Talk:Robert Gallo. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
MastCell
Talk 23:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- RspnsblMn is grateful for the welcome. But RspnsblMn rejects the criticism as illegitimate. Criticizing WP scholarship is not attack ad hominem. Should RspnsblMn thank users in addition to MastCell for the welcome and invalid criticism? Who are, "we" in, "[...W]e would like to remind you...?" Only MastCell signed. RspnsblMn talk 01:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, RspnsblMn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -
Eldereft ~(
s)
talk~ 17:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
There is no reason for the Luk Van Parijs article to contain POV conjectures about David Baltimore. The statement you removed from the article, that Baltimore suggested Caltech look at LvP's work, is sourced, cited, accurate, and neutral. Your suggested replacement
Caltech begins inquiry ("requested" by Baltimore "when New Scientist pointed out" problems).
is inappropriate. betsythedevine ( talk) 06:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
Talk:Robert Gallo. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
MastCell
Talk 23:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- RspnsblMn is grateful for the welcome. But RspnsblMn rejects the criticism as illegitimate. Criticizing WP scholarship is not attack ad hominem. Should RspnsblMn thank users in addition to MastCell for the welcome and invalid criticism? Who are, "we" in, "[...W]e would like to remind you...?" Only MastCell signed. RspnsblMn talk 01:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, RspnsblMn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -
Eldereft ~(
s)
talk~ 17:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
There is no reason for the Luk Van Parijs article to contain POV conjectures about David Baltimore. The statement you removed from the article, that Baltimore suggested Caltech look at LvP's work, is sourced, cited, accurate, and neutral. Your suggested replacement
Caltech begins inquiry ("requested" by Baltimore "when New Scientist pointed out" problems).
is inappropriate. betsythedevine ( talk) 06:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)