Hello, Roccodrift, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for SlutWalk. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Auric
talk 12:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Regarding this, Miles did not violate 3RR, and had already banned you from his talk page. The next time you leave a template on Miles's talk page, with the exception of official administrators noticeboard templates required by policy, you may expect a 24 hour block. Please let me know if you need any clarification — otherwise, stop the templating. ~ Adjwilley ( talk) 22:44, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Please be aware that WP:BLP applies to talk pages also. As such, I have redacted this.- Mr X 21:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Mr X 23:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Please read WP:ELNO, as you seem to be confused:
Links normally to be avoided
Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject,[4] one should generally avoid providing external links to:
1. Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article.
71.23.178.214 (
talk) 08:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Please don't reformat other people's comments. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duck Dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian conservatism ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Would you kindly review WP:Discretionary sanctions and help me understand the reasoning that you followed that led you to drop this warning on my talk page and log my name at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement? Thank you. - Mr X 00:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Phil Robertson". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 00:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting removal of a stigmatizing ARBCOM case log entry. Thank you. - Mr X 15:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sportfan5000 ( talk) 08:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
( edit conflict)Actually, notice was given here. And Roccodrift deleted the notice here. What is interesting is Roccodrift's nonchalance about the SPI. In the one SPI regarding me, there was no evidence to examine so (as I recall) I simply disregarded it. But in this case I think Roccodrift would do well to respond in some declaratory fashion. But, maybe, as newbies go, Roccodrift is simply one cool character. (Composed before Roccodrift deleted section, hence edit conflict.) – S. Rich ( talk) 04:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Your "support" is likely to be misconstrued as support for a topic ban on Arzel. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 21:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
MastCell
Talk 23:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)There is an RfC in which your participation would be greatly appreciated:
Thank you. -- Lightbreather ( talk) 15:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Although no doubt this one's still got a sock. -- Jibal ( talk) 20:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Roccodrift, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for SlutWalk. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Auric
talk 12:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Regarding this, Miles did not violate 3RR, and had already banned you from his talk page. The next time you leave a template on Miles's talk page, with the exception of official administrators noticeboard templates required by policy, you may expect a 24 hour block. Please let me know if you need any clarification — otherwise, stop the templating. ~ Adjwilley ( talk) 22:44, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Please be aware that WP:BLP applies to talk pages also. As such, I have redacted this.- Mr X 21:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Mr X 23:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Please read WP:ELNO, as you seem to be confused:
Links normally to be avoided
Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject,[4] one should generally avoid providing external links to:
1. Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article.
71.23.178.214 (
talk) 08:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Please don't reformat other people's comments. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duck Dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian conservatism ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Would you kindly review WP:Discretionary sanctions and help me understand the reasoning that you followed that led you to drop this warning on my talk page and log my name at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement? Thank you. - Mr X 00:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Phil Robertson". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 00:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting removal of a stigmatizing ARBCOM case log entry. Thank you. - Mr X 15:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sportfan5000 ( talk) 08:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
( edit conflict)Actually, notice was given here. And Roccodrift deleted the notice here. What is interesting is Roccodrift's nonchalance about the SPI. In the one SPI regarding me, there was no evidence to examine so (as I recall) I simply disregarded it. But in this case I think Roccodrift would do well to respond in some declaratory fashion. But, maybe, as newbies go, Roccodrift is simply one cool character. (Composed before Roccodrift deleted section, hence edit conflict.) – S. Rich ( talk) 04:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Your "support" is likely to be misconstrued as support for a topic ban on Arzel. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 21:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
MastCell
Talk 23:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)There is an RfC in which your participation would be greatly appreciated:
Thank you. -- Lightbreather ( talk) 15:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Although no doubt this one's still got a sock. -- Jibal ( talk) 20:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)