Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Universe: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.--
M4gnum0n (
talk) 20:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Why did you revert Pancake? You reintroduced the vandalism that I had just removed.
- :
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Pancake, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
RobertMel (
talk) 01:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I don’t know what you were looking at, but the one I made to Pancake was constructive and appeared constructive. You should put it back the way I had it. —Stephen ( talk) 01:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, noticed your comment on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amiga_Reflections that "Would be interesting to have an article on 3D modeling on Amiga which would contain this material". While searching for sources for this article, I found a comment which seems to provide a good listing/overview for this topic. It would need better sourcing, but might give a start: See Paulomat "Realism is dead, long live simplicity" Mar 22 2009 09:31:33 at http://www.cgenie.com/component/content/article/47-articles/94-realism-is-dead-long-live-simplicity.html?directory=257 Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 05:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
PS-I've made some additions to the Amiga Reflections article. See if you think it's more appropriate. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 05:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes there was, also Uga, Nigeria was also a target yesterday, so if you are interested keep an eye out on that page also. -- Clarince63 ( talk) 11:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
When warning users, could you please stick to the warning order (e.g. vandalism1 -> vandalism2...)? Hitting someone with a third level warning immediately might be a bit over the hill, and for very serious cases there's the 4im warning. noisy jinx huh? 02:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Can't actually remember which user it was, but the article was Death row, so I think it's the right topic (wrong numbers). AFAIA there's no set policy of warning sequence, but e.g. for reporting vandals it makes sense to use the four levels in an ascending order to make sure the user has been sufficiently warned. You may be right with the obscurity of deliberately altering numbers, but I generally try to go with WP:NICE first, especially with new accounts, unless it's a severe case of misconduct. And then it's usually an immediate 4im warning. In the end it's your choice. noisy jinx huh? 02:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Responded to your comment at the Vasilijus Safronovas AFD. I know what you mean about following things in extremely long WP pages, but thankfully AFDs are listed discretely and become separate watchlist items if you have "add pages I edit to my watchlist" turned on in My Preferences/Watchlist, and are not so hard to follow. Novickas ( talk) 14:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Greetings. Do you have any references for the Glicaramide article? PDCook ( talk) 01:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- I found this reference. I'll look into it more tomorrow when I'm at work. PDCook ( talk) 01:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Universe: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.--
M4gnum0n (
talk) 20:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Why did you revert Pancake? You reintroduced the vandalism that I had just removed.
- :
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Pancake, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
RobertMel (
talk) 01:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I don’t know what you were looking at, but the one I made to Pancake was constructive and appeared constructive. You should put it back the way I had it. —Stephen ( talk) 01:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, noticed your comment on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amiga_Reflections that "Would be interesting to have an article on 3D modeling on Amiga which would contain this material". While searching for sources for this article, I found a comment which seems to provide a good listing/overview for this topic. It would need better sourcing, but might give a start: See Paulomat "Realism is dead, long live simplicity" Mar 22 2009 09:31:33 at http://www.cgenie.com/component/content/article/47-articles/94-realism-is-dead-long-live-simplicity.html?directory=257 Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 05:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
PS-I've made some additions to the Amiga Reflections article. See if you think it's more appropriate. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 05:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes there was, also Uga, Nigeria was also a target yesterday, so if you are interested keep an eye out on that page also. -- Clarince63 ( talk) 11:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
When warning users, could you please stick to the warning order (e.g. vandalism1 -> vandalism2...)? Hitting someone with a third level warning immediately might be a bit over the hill, and for very serious cases there's the 4im warning. noisy jinx huh? 02:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Can't actually remember which user it was, but the article was Death row, so I think it's the right topic (wrong numbers). AFAIA there's no set policy of warning sequence, but e.g. for reporting vandals it makes sense to use the four levels in an ascending order to make sure the user has been sufficiently warned. You may be right with the obscurity of deliberately altering numbers, but I generally try to go with WP:NICE first, especially with new accounts, unless it's a severe case of misconduct. And then it's usually an immediate 4im warning. In the end it's your choice. noisy jinx huh? 02:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Responded to your comment at the Vasilijus Safronovas AFD. I know what you mean about following things in extremely long WP pages, but thankfully AFDs are listed discretely and become separate watchlist items if you have "add pages I edit to my watchlist" turned on in My Preferences/Watchlist, and are not so hard to follow. Novickas ( talk) 14:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Greetings. Do you have any references for the Glicaramide article? PDCook ( talk) 01:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- I found this reference. I'll look into it more tomorrow when I'm at work. PDCook ( talk) 01:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)