This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Rick Block! Could you please help? I only just noticed that the feature article Tintin in Tibet that I nominated and ensured promoted has not shown anyone as the nominator here Wikipedia:Featured articles promoted in 2014#Promoted in September 2014, even though I am the primary nominator and I also invited my fellow editor Midnightblueowl to share the credit. Can you help us both receive our additional star for this article on Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations? Maybe I messed things up by adding a second person as nominator. Thanks so much! Cheers. Prhartcom ( talk) 17:02, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Was there a reason the bot did this? Thanks - SchroCat ( talk) 09:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you're well. There was an old set of universities of Canada series which were separately named based on their province or area which now all redirect to universities of Canada. I changed the names of the lists back to their original names when promoted so we wouldn't have the nonsense of five or so former featured lists all called "universities of Canada" but was reverted by the bot. [ [1]] Any way of rectifying it? Cowlibob ( talk) 19:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
This edit by Rick Bot broke the list of admins page. Guettarda ( talk) 19:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Snowager -Talk to Me! 23:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Rick Bot seems to have gotten confused somehow. Yesterday, it reported 596 active admins [2]. Today, it's reporting 447 active admins [3]. That's an enormous, unprecedented (by more than one order of magnitude) drop. Something's not working right... -- Hammersoft ( talk) 16:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
user:Rick_Bot is not currently working. I'm attempting to figure out why and will fix it as soon as I can. -- Rick Block ( talk) 16:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Is it possible to run Rick Bot to index January 2015 CFD discussions? I'm not sure of the proper procedure I just noticed that December, February and March were indexed but not January. Liz Read! Talk! 10:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Rick Block! Random question here – how hard would it be to get Rick Bot to track Good articles, and update the WP:List of Wikipedians by Good Articles page, in the same way it already tracks Featured articles?... Just randomly curious. Thanks in advance! -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:37, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
You forgot to add a star by my name Birdienest81 denoting that I promoted the 73rd Academy Awards to a featured list.
Yesterday, Rick Bot reported 575 active admins [4]. Today, it reports 437 [5]. Hrm. Me thinks something changed (and it wasn't a >100 drop in active admins). -- Hammersoft ( talk) 17:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
It did it again [6]. Not sure why, after a very long period of uninterrupted service. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 17:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Rick, Can you please start this and this report for Urdu Wikipedia? We really need them, Thanks. Muhammad Shuaib ( talk) 18:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
I noticed (because one of mine is missing) that Wikipedia:Featured articles promoted in 2015 is missing the last three three articles listed on Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Featured_log/September_2015. Could you please correct this error and investigate how it happened and make sure its not repeated elsewhere? Thanks, BollyJeff | talk 14:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Rick Block! Could you please help? I only just noticed that the feature article Tintin in Tibet that I nominated and ensured promoted has not shown anyone as the nominator here Wikipedia:Featured articles promoted in 2014#Promoted in September 2014, even though I am the primary nominator and I also invited my fellow editor Midnightblueowl to share the credit. Can you help us both receive our additional star for this article on Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations? Maybe I messed things up by adding a second person as nominator. Thanks so much! Cheers. Prhartcom ( talk) 17:02, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Was there a reason the bot did this? Thanks - SchroCat ( talk) 09:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you're well. There was an old set of universities of Canada series which were separately named based on their province or area which now all redirect to universities of Canada. I changed the names of the lists back to their original names when promoted so we wouldn't have the nonsense of five or so former featured lists all called "universities of Canada" but was reverted by the bot. [ [1]] Any way of rectifying it? Cowlibob ( talk) 19:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
This edit by Rick Bot broke the list of admins page. Guettarda ( talk) 19:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Snowager -Talk to Me! 23:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Rick Bot seems to have gotten confused somehow. Yesterday, it reported 596 active admins [2]. Today, it's reporting 447 active admins [3]. That's an enormous, unprecedented (by more than one order of magnitude) drop. Something's not working right... -- Hammersoft ( talk) 16:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
user:Rick_Bot is not currently working. I'm attempting to figure out why and will fix it as soon as I can. -- Rick Block ( talk) 16:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Is it possible to run Rick Bot to index January 2015 CFD discussions? I'm not sure of the proper procedure I just noticed that December, February and March were indexed but not January. Liz Read! Talk! 10:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Rick Block! Random question here – how hard would it be to get Rick Bot to track Good articles, and update the WP:List of Wikipedians by Good Articles page, in the same way it already tracks Featured articles?... Just randomly curious. Thanks in advance! -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:37, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
You forgot to add a star by my name Birdienest81 denoting that I promoted the 73rd Academy Awards to a featured list.
Yesterday, Rick Bot reported 575 active admins [4]. Today, it reports 437 [5]. Hrm. Me thinks something changed (and it wasn't a >100 drop in active admins). -- Hammersoft ( talk) 17:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
It did it again [6]. Not sure why, after a very long period of uninterrupted service. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 17:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Rick, Can you please start this and this report for Urdu Wikipedia? We really need them, Thanks. Muhammad Shuaib ( talk) 18:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
I noticed (because one of mine is missing) that Wikipedia:Featured articles promoted in 2015 is missing the last three three articles listed on Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Featured_log/September_2015. Could you please correct this error and investigate how it happened and make sure its not repeated elsewhere? Thanks, BollyJeff | talk 14:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)