This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It's been a while since you introduced yourself, but I have a complicated question on Photographs for Submission, and thought that you would be a good starting point. If my question is beyond your knowledge base, could you possibly refer me to someone who can answer the question and give guidance about the procedure? I tried to read Wiki's page on permissions for photographs but left confused. I will soon to create a new article which will involve a historic event which took place in San Francisco near the start of the 20th century. San Francisco's library has a large stock of digitized historic photos, and I thought that it would be great if I could include a few of them in the article. Can you please give me your take on what I need to in getting this to happen for my article?
When I emailed the Photo Curator at the San Francisco Public Library with my desire to include some of there digitized photos, this was her response.
And this is the legal jargon on the Permission to Publish form, along with web links to the document.
Your statement from your user page,
seems like it was written directly for the difficult individuals I'm dealing with on the Lap Dance article. When you get a chance, please look at the Talk Page for Lap Dance, and tell me on my talk page how or where I should go to resolve this mess. Thanx. James Carroll ( talk) 22:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
This is a few hours later, and I would like to report VANDALISM to the Lap Dance article by Candleabracadabra. In the late evening, and with no discussion on the article Talk page, Candleabracadabra tore out half of the article -- specifically the parts that I had research and written. I have reverted it back to the state before he started cutting. Please advise me. James Carroll ( talk) 04:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Just a friendly note that Rick Bot is down updating pages. Thanks. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 07:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
D'oh, and back down again. I wonder why it keeps doing that.. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 09:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
User:Scottperry has posted a reply to your comment on his talk page at: LA sublists. Please feel free to erase this message if you prefer.
I've had a username change from Truthkeeper88 to Victoriaearle - both are the same person, both are me. But at WP:WBFAN they show up as two different people. I don't really mind that much but seems that it would be nice to be accurate there. Is there any way of making the bot consolidate the two users? It was done manually here but then the bot changed it back here. I think there are other editors, too, who have had user name changes, but presumably the bot can't know unless notified? Anyway, I thought I'd post this query here. Thanks. Victoria ( tk) 21:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
— Vensatry (Ping) 05:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:United States Department of Energy National Laboratories, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 22:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Is there a way to merge into User:Wadewitz, the prior contributions before the user-name-change, of User:Awadewit -- at Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations ?
Thank you for your maintenance of the page Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations,
— Cirt ( talk) 17:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
This would bring her total WP:FA count correctly to thirty-six (36), which correlates both with User:Wadewitz and Los Angeles Times which stated: "She also was the author of 36 "featured" articles, the highest distinction bestowed by other Wikipedians based on accuracy, fairness, style and comprehensiveness.".
Thank you for your time, — Cirt ( talk) 19:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Now we gotta compare that with User:Wadewitz to see which two are missing.
— Cirt ( talk) 01:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
dutiful bots and personal advice
Thank you for keeping "the place running" by your bots who serve daily. and for helping editors, for example the author and photographer of the gem to connect to his past achievements, - in other words: you are an
awesome Wikipedian! - to quote you: "see what kind of mood you're in"?
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Two years ago, you were the 162nd recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:23, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
There is a draft of a significant re-write of Monty Hall here. I'd appreciate your comments especially as regards WP:NPOV and with an eye to referencing or removing what content remains. SPACKlick ( talk) 14:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x100 m Men/small has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 11:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x400 m Men/script has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 11:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Rick:
I changed my name a bit ago from "Albacore" to "Seattle". I'm wondering if you can combine the two for Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured list nominations, for attribution reasons, and change the one article under "Albacore" at Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations to my current name; if you could, that would be great. Thanks. Seattle ( talk) 01:30, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi there,
About a month ago, 59th Academy Awards, which I nominated, was promoted as a featured list. However, I am missing a star over at List of Wikipedians by featured list nominations. How can this be fixed.
1 and 2 - an intermittent problem that you may not have seen, so I thought I'd let you know about it. Cheers, Bencherlite Talk 11:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
A case ( Monty Hall problem) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee -- S Philbrick (Talk) 21:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
This edit in June was really screwed up. Nergaal ( talk) 13:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It's been a while since you introduced yourself, but I have a complicated question on Photographs for Submission, and thought that you would be a good starting point. If my question is beyond your knowledge base, could you possibly refer me to someone who can answer the question and give guidance about the procedure? I tried to read Wiki's page on permissions for photographs but left confused. I will soon to create a new article which will involve a historic event which took place in San Francisco near the start of the 20th century. San Francisco's library has a large stock of digitized historic photos, and I thought that it would be great if I could include a few of them in the article. Can you please give me your take on what I need to in getting this to happen for my article?
When I emailed the Photo Curator at the San Francisco Public Library with my desire to include some of there digitized photos, this was her response.
And this is the legal jargon on the Permission to Publish form, along with web links to the document.
Your statement from your user page,
seems like it was written directly for the difficult individuals I'm dealing with on the Lap Dance article. When you get a chance, please look at the Talk Page for Lap Dance, and tell me on my talk page how or where I should go to resolve this mess. Thanx. James Carroll ( talk) 22:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
This is a few hours later, and I would like to report VANDALISM to the Lap Dance article by Candleabracadabra. In the late evening, and with no discussion on the article Talk page, Candleabracadabra tore out half of the article -- specifically the parts that I had research and written. I have reverted it back to the state before he started cutting. Please advise me. James Carroll ( talk) 04:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Just a friendly note that Rick Bot is down updating pages. Thanks. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 07:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
D'oh, and back down again. I wonder why it keeps doing that.. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 09:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
User:Scottperry has posted a reply to your comment on his talk page at: LA sublists. Please feel free to erase this message if you prefer.
I've had a username change from Truthkeeper88 to Victoriaearle - both are the same person, both are me. But at WP:WBFAN they show up as two different people. I don't really mind that much but seems that it would be nice to be accurate there. Is there any way of making the bot consolidate the two users? It was done manually here but then the bot changed it back here. I think there are other editors, too, who have had user name changes, but presumably the bot can't know unless notified? Anyway, I thought I'd post this query here. Thanks. Victoria ( tk) 21:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
— Vensatry (Ping) 05:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:United States Department of Energy National Laboratories, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 22:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Is there a way to merge into User:Wadewitz, the prior contributions before the user-name-change, of User:Awadewit -- at Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations ?
Thank you for your maintenance of the page Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations,
— Cirt ( talk) 17:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
This would bring her total WP:FA count correctly to thirty-six (36), which correlates both with User:Wadewitz and Los Angeles Times which stated: "She also was the author of 36 "featured" articles, the highest distinction bestowed by other Wikipedians based on accuracy, fairness, style and comprehensiveness.".
Thank you for your time, — Cirt ( talk) 19:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Now we gotta compare that with User:Wadewitz to see which two are missing.
— Cirt ( talk) 01:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
dutiful bots and personal advice
Thank you for keeping "the place running" by your bots who serve daily. and for helping editors, for example the author and photographer of the gem to connect to his past achievements, - in other words: you are an
awesome Wikipedian! - to quote you: "see what kind of mood you're in"?
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Two years ago, you were the 162nd recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:23, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
There is a draft of a significant re-write of Monty Hall here. I'd appreciate your comments especially as regards WP:NPOV and with an eye to referencing or removing what content remains. SPACKlick ( talk) 14:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x100 m Men/small has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 11:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x400 m Men/script has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SFB 11:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Rick:
I changed my name a bit ago from "Albacore" to "Seattle". I'm wondering if you can combine the two for Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured list nominations, for attribution reasons, and change the one article under "Albacore" at Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations to my current name; if you could, that would be great. Thanks. Seattle ( talk) 01:30, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi there,
About a month ago, 59th Academy Awards, which I nominated, was promoted as a featured list. However, I am missing a star over at List of Wikipedians by featured list nominations. How can this be fixed.
1 and 2 - an intermittent problem that you may not have seen, so I thought I'd let you know about it. Cheers, Bencherlite Talk 11:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
A case ( Monty Hall problem) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee -- S Philbrick (Talk) 21:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
This edit in June was really screwed up. Nergaal ( talk) 13:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)