This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
Future meetings
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
Ive been looking through
Category:Pages with template loops, and ive noticed pretty much all of your /scripts/ pages have popped up in them. Looking further into the issue, it seems to be originating from
User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/template, which has confused me quite a bit. First of all, the onlyinclude tags dont seem to be doing much work, if any. The page displays the same no matter how i change it. Second of all, the reccursion is probably comming from the call of {{#invoke:string|match
, and how you fetch its own content. Ill let you decide how you want to fix it, since it still seems to give the content back. Hope this helps.
Aidan9382 (
talk) 05:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />Script installation text}}
in
User:Qwerfjkl/tempscript. Looking deeper, the issue seems to originate from this line (<includeonly>{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#if:{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#invoke:String|match|s={{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />:{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[Category:Wikipedia scripts]]|plain=true|nomatch=}}||{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#switch:{{{categorize|{{{cat|}}}}}}|never|no=|{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#switch:{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />NAMESPACENUMBER}}|2|4=[[Category:Wikipedia scripts|{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />SUBPAGENAME}}]]}}}}}}</includeonly>
) in {{
Script installation text}}. I dont really know enough to understand the full extent of this line, so I'll leave it to you to decide if its posible to/worth fixing the looping.
Aidan9382 (
talk) 06:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
I believe P_talk:SARS-CoV-2 was created in mainspace by mistake when making the portal redirect. If you want to G7 it or move it where you believe it should be. WikiVirus C (talk) 23:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
I've nominated this for speedy deletion as you seem to have created it by accident. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
talk
just before a colon, so
P:SARS-CoV-2 becomes
P talk:SARS-CoV-2. This is a known bug, but I always forget to fix it (see
#Speedy deletion nomination of ISO 639-6 talk:xghu). ―
Qwerfjkl
talk 06:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Qwerfjkl, thanks for closing Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 9 § Category:Wikipedia requested edits. Not a big deal but I think one of the post-split categories should be Category:Wikipedia partially-block edit requests per mine and DarthFlappy's responses. Thanks! — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 13:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
First of all thanks a lot for all your work at CfD! Regarding the 3rd relisting of this discussion, I hope you are aware that relisting more than twice is a bit unusual? See also WP:RELIST about that. Fwiw, personally I am even a bit more reluctant with relisting than that. I would mainly relist a second time when there has been some more discussion since the first relisting but nothing conclusive. But in case of no further discussion and if I am too uncertain about it I would usually not relist it a second time but rather leave it to an administrator to close. (In this particular case I might have closed the discussion as rename though.) Please just treat this as a minor comment, not as serious criticism. Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
User:Qwerfjkl/preservedCategories, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Qwerfjkl/preservedCategories and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Qwerfjkl/preservedCategories during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
I see you recently reverted an edit at List of Australian Aboriginal group names that had changed 'lillup' to 'lollup'. I'm just letting you know that I'm going to delete 'lillup' as an alternative name to Alura. I'm a linguist and work with Australian languages and have been trying to find how/why this name came to be inserted as an alternative to Alura (who actually prefer to be known as Jaminjung) but it seems pretty clearly an error. There is a plant from Central Australia known as 'alura' (in the Alyawarr language) which has an alternative name of 'lilup' and I think that's how the confusion arose. Anyway, as you made a relevant edit I thought I'd let you know.
Cheers, Dougg ( talk) 04:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
I've granted page mover per your request at WP:PERM; guidelines for usage of the right are found at Wikipedia:Page mover. If you have any questions, or in the future decide that you do not intend to use the tool, you can contact me or any other administrator. Hog Farm Talk 20:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Qwerfjkl,
You tagged this category for deletion but it still has 68,291 pages in it so I'm going to remove the tag. The category has to be emptied first and I think you need help from an admin who closes CFD cases for this one. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Qwerfjkl, there is a discussion open regarding edits made by your bot at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Controversy_About_Report_Being_Generated_by_Bot. Please see and comment there when you have a moment. — xaosflux Talk 14:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Qwerfjkl,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 815 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
I think in this discussion you accidentally moved the nominated category to the wrong target. Can you have another look please? Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sarah-Nicole Robles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creep Talk 15:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Qwerfjkl,
I don't think you can find an admin who will delete a full category based on a CSD tag. All of the contents of this category need to be recategorized first to the new category, prior to this page being deleted. But you should be familiar with this process since you regularly close CFD discussions now so I'm a little bit confused by your request. Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Would you mind reversing this closure? Per
WP:BADNAC, A non-admin closure is not appropriate [... when] the outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial. Such closes are better left to an administrator
. That argument seems to apply here.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 15:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
no consensusreally constitutes a proper closure. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I know I've disagreed with several of your decisions regarding categories in the past, but still you are doing a very good job at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC) |
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kay eff cee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 27#Kay eff cee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 747pilot ( talk) 19:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kay ef cee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 27#Kay ef cee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 747pilot ( talk) 21:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Video games set on fictional planets. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Masem ( t) 14:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Hi, please could you expand your close of Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_23#Video_games_set_in_a_fictional_location, to specify which parents you merged each deleted category to? E.g. it appears from [12] that you merged Category:Video games set on fictional islands to Category:Video games set on islands, but not also to Category:Works set on fictional islands.
IMHO it would also be appropriate for you to state your rationale for merging to only one parent, as suggested by User:Zxcvbnm, rather than to all parents, as suggested by me.
I have no objection to you processing CFDs manually, as you are leaving a clear edit summary, but feel free to list them instead at WT:CFDW, so that an admin can then feed the donkey work to a bot. – Fayenatic London 09:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
Future meetings
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
Ive been looking through
Category:Pages with template loops, and ive noticed pretty much all of your /scripts/ pages have popped up in them. Looking further into the issue, it seems to be originating from
User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/template, which has confused me quite a bit. First of all, the onlyinclude tags dont seem to be doing much work, if any. The page displays the same no matter how i change it. Second of all, the reccursion is probably comming from the call of {{#invoke:string|match
, and how you fetch its own content. Ill let you decide how you want to fix it, since it still seems to give the content back. Hope this helps.
Aidan9382 (
talk) 05:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />Script installation text}}
in
User:Qwerfjkl/tempscript. Looking deeper, the issue seems to originate from this line (<includeonly>{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#if:{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#invoke:String|match|s={{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />:{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[Category:Wikipedia scripts]]|plain=true|nomatch=}}||{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#switch:{{{categorize|{{{cat|}}}}}}|never|no=|{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#switch:{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />NAMESPACENUMBER}}|2|4=[[Category:Wikipedia scripts|{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />SUBPAGENAME}}]]}}}}}}</includeonly>
) in {{
Script installation text}}. I dont really know enough to understand the full extent of this line, so I'll leave it to you to decide if its posible to/worth fixing the looping.
Aidan9382 (
talk) 06:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
I believe P_talk:SARS-CoV-2 was created in mainspace by mistake when making the portal redirect. If you want to G7 it or move it where you believe it should be. WikiVirus C (talk) 23:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
I've nominated this for speedy deletion as you seem to have created it by accident. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
talk
just before a colon, so
P:SARS-CoV-2 becomes
P talk:SARS-CoV-2. This is a known bug, but I always forget to fix it (see
#Speedy deletion nomination of ISO 639-6 talk:xghu). ―
Qwerfjkl
talk 06:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Qwerfjkl, thanks for closing Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 9 § Category:Wikipedia requested edits. Not a big deal but I think one of the post-split categories should be Category:Wikipedia partially-block edit requests per mine and DarthFlappy's responses. Thanks! — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 13:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
First of all thanks a lot for all your work at CfD! Regarding the 3rd relisting of this discussion, I hope you are aware that relisting more than twice is a bit unusual? See also WP:RELIST about that. Fwiw, personally I am even a bit more reluctant with relisting than that. I would mainly relist a second time when there has been some more discussion since the first relisting but nothing conclusive. But in case of no further discussion and if I am too uncertain about it I would usually not relist it a second time but rather leave it to an administrator to close. (In this particular case I might have closed the discussion as rename though.) Please just treat this as a minor comment, not as serious criticism. Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
User:Qwerfjkl/preservedCategories, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Qwerfjkl/preservedCategories and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Qwerfjkl/preservedCategories during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
I see you recently reverted an edit at List of Australian Aboriginal group names that had changed 'lillup' to 'lollup'. I'm just letting you know that I'm going to delete 'lillup' as an alternative name to Alura. I'm a linguist and work with Australian languages and have been trying to find how/why this name came to be inserted as an alternative to Alura (who actually prefer to be known as Jaminjung) but it seems pretty clearly an error. There is a plant from Central Australia known as 'alura' (in the Alyawarr language) which has an alternative name of 'lilup' and I think that's how the confusion arose. Anyway, as you made a relevant edit I thought I'd let you know.
Cheers, Dougg ( talk) 04:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
I've granted page mover per your request at WP:PERM; guidelines for usage of the right are found at Wikipedia:Page mover. If you have any questions, or in the future decide that you do not intend to use the tool, you can contact me or any other administrator. Hog Farm Talk 20:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Qwerfjkl,
You tagged this category for deletion but it still has 68,291 pages in it so I'm going to remove the tag. The category has to be emptied first and I think you need help from an admin who closes CFD cases for this one. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Qwerfjkl, there is a discussion open regarding edits made by your bot at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Controversy_About_Report_Being_Generated_by_Bot. Please see and comment there when you have a moment. — xaosflux Talk 14:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Qwerfjkl,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 815 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
I think in this discussion you accidentally moved the nominated category to the wrong target. Can you have another look please? Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Problems
Changes later this week
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sarah-Nicole Robles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creep Talk 15:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Qwerfjkl,
I don't think you can find an admin who will delete a full category based on a CSD tag. All of the contents of this category need to be recategorized first to the new category, prior to this page being deleted. But you should be familiar with this process since you regularly close CFD discussions now so I'm a little bit confused by your request. Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Would you mind reversing this closure? Per
WP:BADNAC, A non-admin closure is not appropriate [... when] the outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial. Such closes are better left to an administrator
. That argument seems to apply here.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 15:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
no consensusreally constitutes a proper closure. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I know I've disagreed with several of your decisions regarding categories in the past, but still you are doing a very good job at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC) |
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kay eff cee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 27#Kay eff cee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 747pilot ( talk) 19:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kay ef cee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 27#Kay ef cee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 747pilot ( talk) 21:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Video games set on fictional planets. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Masem ( t) 14:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Hi, please could you expand your close of Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_23#Video_games_set_in_a_fictional_location, to specify which parents you merged each deleted category to? E.g. it appears from [12] that you merged Category:Video games set on fictional islands to Category:Video games set on islands, but not also to Category:Works set on fictional islands.
IMHO it would also be appropriate for you to state your rationale for merging to only one parent, as suggested by User:Zxcvbnm, rather than to all parents, as suggested by me.
I have no objection to you processing CFDs manually, as you are leaving a clear edit summary, but feel free to list them instead at WT:CFDW, so that an admin can then feed the donkey work to a bot. – Fayenatic London 09:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)