|
User talk: Purplebackpack89 |
|---|
 Archives |
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email), Godot13 ( talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 ( talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.
Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.
Thank you. Toddst1 ( talk) 23:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- This is just bureaucratic. Why isn't linking to a bluelinked article that provides sources for the day of the event sufficient anymore?
p
b
p 23:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- It never really was sufficient and led to tons of problems. Many of the linked articles lacked WP:RS as well. See WP:CIRCULAR for why blue links are never sufficient to reference within Wikipedia. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of United States presidential firsts for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States presidential firsts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States presidential firsts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy ( help!) 10:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
The Haunted Mansion mention in the ride experience section of the Disneyland Railroad article is problematic. As you said, you can't really see it from the railroad, and I believe it's not even mentioned over the loudspeaker while you're riding. Also, if you read the text of the article you included (thank you for adding it, BTW), it only briefly mentions the railroad in the 1960s when it describes the berm going past the ride and does not mention a tunnel in place at that time. The info in parentheses about the exact spot under the ride that the railroad traverses is unnecessary detail, and is more suited for the Haunted Mansion article itself. Furthermore, in your latest edit you removed wikilinks that were in place. Overall, I would have preferred to not have this info in the article at all, but having it simply mention that the railroad passes by the Haunted Mansion (which is objectively true) would be an acceptable compromise. Jackdude101 talk cont 14:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- @
Jackdude101: OK, I'll acquiesce to that.
p
b
p 14:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will make that change. Jackdude101 talk cont 14:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you were active at Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/5 and was hoping I could ask you a question. I nominated someone for removal from the historian group [1]. I've never been a part of discussions here and was wondering if I made any mistakes (other than forgetting an edit summary, sorry about that) and wanted to make sure I didn't break any unwritten rules regarding how discussions proceed. Hope today finds you well. // Timothy :: talk 18:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- @
TimothyBlue: That's pretty much how you do it, except you should also cast the first support vote. The pound sign and your signature (# ~~~~) should be enough since you've offered nomination rationale above.
p
b
p 18:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- @ Purplebackpack89: Thank you // Timothy :: talk 18:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
-
Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points. -
Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare. -
Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States. -
Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist. -
CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing
Cactus wren to featured article status. - The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included
L293D,
Kingsif,
Enwebb,
Lee Vilenski and
CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
You will need to source how much he's spent on the campaign. I've reverted your edit. -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 20:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @ Mr. Vernon: The FOUR HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS figure is sourced in the body of the article already. p b p 20:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter;
L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead,
Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
-
Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
-
Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
-
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews -
Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
-
Lee Vilenski with 869 points,
Hog Farm with 801,
Kingsif with 719,
SounderBruce with 710,
Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and
MX with 515.
The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Jerry Sloan
On 23 May 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jerry Sloan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 04:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Biddle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicholas Biddle ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Colored books
A tag has been placed on Category:Colored books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 03:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Colored books
A tag has been placed on Category:Colored books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
-
Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
-
The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
-
Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.
Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally,
MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk), Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
"Dirty Don" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Dirty Don. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 8#Dirty Don until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Momo824 (
talk) 06:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Message added 14:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AldezD ( talk) 14:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Message added 16:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AldezD ( talk) 16:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Arnold (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cohen.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
-
Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items; -
HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs; -
Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.
Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk), Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
A ping to let you know they're still at it; through a painful BLP AfD the last two days, the sockfarm Jeffman12345 has been unearthed as their newest collection of socks. I've added it to the ICT page. Nate • ( chatter) 21:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
"Joe Biden (Amtrak station)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Joe Biden (Amtrak station). The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 16#Joe Biden (Amtrak station) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —
Tartan357 (
Talk) 20:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Archive top red
Template:Archive top red has been
nominated for merging with
Template:Archive top. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits 16:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is
Lee Vilenski (
submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by
.svg){kind=small}
Gog the Mild (
submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points.
The Rambling Man (
submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with
Epicgenius (
submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.
The other finalists were
Hog Farm (
submissions),
HaEr48 (
submissions),
Harrias (
submissions) and
Bloom6132 (
submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
-
Gog the Mild (
submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
-
Bloom6132 (
submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
-
Rhododendrites (
submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
-
Lee Vilenski (
submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
-
Epicgenius (
submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
-
MPJ-DK (
submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
-
The Rambling Man (
submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
-
Epicgenius (
submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
-
Bloom6132 (
submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Archive top purple
Template:Archive top purple has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
The Only Zac (
talk •
contribs) 22:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
"Gulielmus Shakspere" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Gulielmus Shakspere. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 7#Gulielmus Shakspere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 05:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Soul of America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:16, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I saw your section on Talk:Muse_(children's_magazine) and liked your "Notes Taken" and "Trails blazed". I don't know if that's enough for the Barnstar of Good Humor, but I think it's funny anyway. Cheers! — WinnerWolf99 talk What did I break now? 13:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
This year, many people had COVID to fear,
The holidays are getting near,
One thing that will be clear,
We will still have holiday cheer,
Happy holidays and happy new year!!
From
Interstellarity (
talk) 14:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @ Interstellarity: Cool poem! Sorry for not getting back to you sooner...wouldn't you know it, I closed the year out with the fourth computer repair of the year. p b p 23:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
|
User talk: Purplebackpack89 |
|---|
|
Archives |
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email), Godot13 ( talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 ( talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.
Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.
Thank you. Toddst1 ( talk) 23:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- This is just bureaucratic. Why isn't linking to a bluelinked article that provides sources for the day of the event sufficient anymore?
p
b
p 23:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- It never really was sufficient and led to tons of problems. Many of the linked articles lacked WP:RS as well. See WP:CIRCULAR for why blue links are never sufficient to reference within Wikipedia. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of United States presidential firsts for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States presidential firsts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States presidential firsts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy ( help!) 10:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
The Haunted Mansion mention in the ride experience section of the Disneyland Railroad article is problematic. As you said, you can't really see it from the railroad, and I believe it's not even mentioned over the loudspeaker while you're riding. Also, if you read the text of the article you included (thank you for adding it, BTW), it only briefly mentions the railroad in the 1960s when it describes the berm going past the ride and does not mention a tunnel in place at that time. The info in parentheses about the exact spot under the ride that the railroad traverses is unnecessary detail, and is more suited for the Haunted Mansion article itself. Furthermore, in your latest edit you removed wikilinks that were in place. Overall, I would have preferred to not have this info in the article at all, but having it simply mention that the railroad passes by the Haunted Mansion (which is objectively true) would be an acceptable compromise. Jackdude101 talk cont 14:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- @
Jackdude101: OK, I'll acquiesce to that.
p
b
p 14:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will make that change. Jackdude101 talk cont 14:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you were active at Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/5 and was hoping I could ask you a question. I nominated someone for removal from the historian group [1]. I've never been a part of discussions here and was wondering if I made any mistakes (other than forgetting an edit summary, sorry about that) and wanted to make sure I didn't break any unwritten rules regarding how discussions proceed. Hope today finds you well. // Timothy :: talk 18:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- @
TimothyBlue: That's pretty much how you do it, except you should also cast the first support vote. The pound sign and your signature (# ~~~~) should be enough since you've offered nomination rationale above.
p
b
p 18:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- @ Purplebackpack89: Thank you // Timothy :: talk 18:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
-
Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
-
Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
-
Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
-
Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
-
CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing
Cactus wren to featured article status.
- The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included
L293D,
Kingsif,
Enwebb,
Lee Vilenski and
CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
You will need to source how much he's spent on the campaign. I've reverted your edit. -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 20:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @ Mr. Vernon: The FOUR HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS figure is sourced in the body of the article already. p b p 20:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter;
L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead,
Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
-
Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
-
Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
-
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
-
Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
-
Lee Vilenski with 869 points,
Hog Farm with 801,
Kingsif with 719,
SounderBruce with 710,
Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and
MX with 515.
The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Jerry Sloan
On 23 May 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jerry Sloan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 04:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Biddle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicholas Biddle ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Colored books
A tag has been placed on Category:Colored books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 03:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Colored books
A tag has been placed on Category:Colored books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
-
Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
-
The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
-
Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.
Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally,
MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk), Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
"Dirty Don" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Dirty Don. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 8#Dirty Don until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Momo824 (
talk) 06:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Message added 14:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AldezD ( talk) 14:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Message added 16:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AldezD ( talk) 16:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Arnold (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cohen.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
-
Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
-
HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
-
Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.
Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk), Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
A ping to let you know they're still at it; through a painful BLP AfD the last two days, the sockfarm Jeffman12345 has been unearthed as their newest collection of socks. I've added it to the ICT page. Nate • ( chatter) 21:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
"Joe Biden (Amtrak station)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Joe Biden (Amtrak station). The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 16#Joe Biden (Amtrak station) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —
Tartan357 (
Talk) 20:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Archive top red
Template:Archive top red has been
nominated for merging with
Template:Archive top. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits 16:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is
Lee Vilenski (
submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by
Gog the Mild (
submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points.
The Rambling Man (
submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with
Epicgenius (
submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.
The other finalists were
Hog Farm (
submissions),
HaEr48 (
submissions),
Harrias (
submissions) and
Bloom6132 (
submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
-
Gog the Mild (
submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
-
Bloom6132 (
submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
-
Rhododendrites (
submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
-
Lee Vilenski (
submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
-
Epicgenius (
submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
-
MPJ-DK (
submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
-
The Rambling Man (
submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
-
Epicgenius (
submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
-
Bloom6132 (
submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Archive top purple
Template:Archive top purple has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
The Only Zac (
talk •
contribs) 22:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
"Gulielmus Shakspere" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Gulielmus Shakspere. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 7#Gulielmus Shakspere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 05:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Soul of America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:16, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I saw your section on Talk:Muse_(children's_magazine) and liked your "Notes Taken" and "Trails blazed". I don't know if that's enough for the Barnstar of Good Humor, but I think it's funny anyway. Cheers! — WinnerWolf99 talk What did I break now? 13:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
This year, many people had COVID to fear,
The holidays are getting near,
One thing that will be clear,
We will still have holiday cheer,
Happy holidays and happy new year!!
From
Interstellarity (
talk) 14:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @ Interstellarity: Cool poem! Sorry for not getting back to you sooner...wouldn't you know it, I closed the year out with the fourth computer repair of the year. p b p 23:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)