This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Nev1, thanks for the help with the article and please continue :) I didn't want to seem rude and just remove it but there was never a connection between the MBB canal and the Rochdale canal - the only access to the Rochdale was via the Irwell, and through the Manchester and Salford Junction Canal, or via the Bridgewater Canal also from the Irwell. Parrot of Doom ( talk) 13:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I've added a load more info and references. Do you think the history section could do with splitting up? I'm thinking of resubmitting it but could use another trained eye to have a look before I do that. I'm wondering if it makes sense to reorganise the references so the little numbers are in order, but I'm not sure if thats overkill or not :) Parrot of Doom ( talk) 18:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Woody ( talk) 21:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 08:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for touching up
Hylton Castle, especially for streamlining the refs - I had no idea I could do that that could be done. It's really appreciated :-)
Craigy (
talk) 00:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
I've just made a few comments on the article's talk page. It needs a bit of work yet to get through GA I think, so a very wise decision not to nominate it for FAC. :-) -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 19:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
The
June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 19:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! -- PeterSymonds (talk) 09:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I've had a first run through Warwick Castle, and made a few changes. As ever, if you don't agree with any of them, feel free to revert. I'll probably have another run through over the weekend.
I don't think you'll get picked up over comprehensiveness at FAC, but I did struggle a few times with trying to follow the narrative flow. For instance:
It's hard to give feedback without appearing to be negative, but I really don't mean to be at all. I think that with just a bit more tinkering this would make a very plausible FAC. BTW, I don't know if you noticed, but you were right about Ordsall Hall. Sailed through its GA nomination. :-) -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 21:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, in regards to the query on how to rephrase "The current castle, built in stone during the reign of King Henry II, is on the same site as the earlier Norman motte-and-bailey castle.", I rethought about my opinion. I now think it should be fine since the motte-and-bailey concept encompass the walled-in village. I see that Malleus is copy-editing the article and I think he is doing well, so good luck on your FAC! Jappalang ( talk) 22:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
It may me not understanding, but how is this: "It is traditionally associated with the earldom of Warwick, one of the oldest in England, although it was not in their possession between the early 17th and mid-18th centuries. The castle was owned by the Greville family until the 1970s", consistent with this: "In 1604, the ruinous castle was given to Sir Fulke Greville ... When the title of Earl of Warwick was created for the third time in 1618, the Greville family were still in possession of Warwick Castle; the Grevilles retained ownership of the castle until it was sold to The Tussauds Group in 1978."? -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 01:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks again for your comments -
Forksville Covered Bridge made
featured article today! Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC) |
---|
Hi, best of luck with the FAC and thanks for an excellent article on my local castle. Graham. GrahamColm Talk 18:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support, especially going to the effort of editing the article yourself. Nev1 ( talk) 21:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 10:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Please see my response to your GA review of Stages of growth model. -- Rmrfstar ( talk) 15:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Am I right in thinking that you've been offered a nomination before? If so, I wish for you to reconsider. I know we've not interacted that much and our occasional discussion has been limited to the project talk page but I've found your editing and communication skills are excellent; both traits I'm sure the community would love to see all administrators have. I hope you contemplate this offer and if you decline, it won't matter that much. :) Rud get 11:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Just a reminder that RfA is a brutal and often senseless process, I got this oppose because I asked the admin why he'd blanked my RfA nomination page. If I was American, I might be inclined to say "go figure". But I'm not, so I won't. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 23:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I reviewed your GA nom for Mamucium and put it on hold until some issues, mainly with the clarity, are resolved. You can see my recommendations on the bottom of the talk page. :) Intothewoods29 ( talk) 21:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the speedy response. The article is much better, so I promoted to Good Article! :D Intothewoods29 ( talk) 22:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi , I was thinking of creating a public domain plan of Warwick Castle, which would allow the fair use one in the article to be replaced. I just wanted to check that you did not have anything planned, I don't want to go stepping on any toes whilst a WP:FAC was underway. I also wondered if you know of any other sources of plans. I have a number of satellite photos (Google maps is particularly good), the only map source of the rooms I have is the image you uploaded. GameKeeper ( talk) 21:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I know you're busy with Warwick Castle, but if you can spare a few moments could you take a quick look at Trafford Park? I know the lead needs to be expanded, but I prefer to do that at the end. The Governance and Decline regeneration sections still need a little bit more work, and of course a map would be nice ... hang on, I think I've answered my own question. Any other suggestions you have would be gratefully received—I've had this one on the back-burner for too long, so I'd like to see it finished, or at least at GA anyway. Thanks. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 22:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The
July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 02:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! Just thought I'd let you know that there is a Sale set of photographs at Flickr that has suitable licencing for upload to commons. It is found here. They're not perfect, but they may be useful. I can trim or touch-up if you want me to. :) -- Jza84 | Talk 12:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck for your RFA -- Tinu Cherian - 13:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
This is not the kind of thing you really ought to be saying during your RfA. :lol: -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 18:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
I was very tempted to post a faux- Uw-hblock here for this "outburst", but then thought that some might actually think you've been blocked!!... I don't think you'd forgive me if it stubbed out your RFA! :D -- Jza84 | Talk 19:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
No worries, mate. Scarian Call me Pat! 14:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Tell me about it... page numbers, boy. Not good. I mean the Oldham article will be a toughy as most of those books I had to get especially from the library! Even when I did a masters degree I didn't need to cite the page numbers! Oh well...
I'll take a look at things tonight for Sale, and I'll even look through my books for some factoids to add (I have a few pan-Greater Manchester books). Its looking very very healthy now though I have to say. Did you notice the links to geograph above, one of which has a free-to-use shot of (what I think is) the parish church? Might be handy. :) -- Jza84 | Talk 15:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your RfA passing! Here are some useless useful links for you:
If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a line and I (or another experienced admin) will be more than happy to help you out.
Congrats again!
EVula //
talk //
☯ // 19:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
(oh, and don't delete the
Main Page)
Congratulations from me too. It's well deserved. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 21:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I dont know why your talkpage is on my Watchlist, but I saw how you'd been made an Admin. Congratulations! All the best! Police,Mad,Jack ( talk · contribs)☺ 15:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hopefully fixed now: but they may need formatting. Lozleader ( talk) 20:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Why not comprimise with both? I do not see why the List of London is the benchmark. Can you point out why this is the case? ( Archangel1 ( talk) 20:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)).
Fair point. At least you had the common courtesy to reply in a recent manner. These list articles have numerous problems and this highlights it again. I do not agree with the answer but I've grown weary of trying to prove my point. ( Archangel1 ( talk) 20:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)).
Sorry to see that Sale still hasn't been promoted to FA, but it's surely close now. I think the copyediting effort was left too late, and I just haven't been able to spend the time I wanted to on it over the last few days. But after a couple of weeks timeout I'm sure we can get it through next time. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 22:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I do have a copy of Arrowsmith. I was reading it this week with that very task in mind. The task is complicated a bit by Stockport the town being utterly absorbed into Stockport the metropolitan borough - I can't find a modern map that shows the town. I don't get the time that I once did, but I'll try to come up with a decent section. Regards, Mr Stephen ( talk) 18:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry I can't be of more help, but I made most of that article from what was posted on their pages. However, it is highly likely to be the 4th largest, as the Westfield London is yet to be completed, so I'd use that for now. You may wish to contact User:Joshii as I believe he was the one who updated the figure for the Trafford Centre. Thanks, Asdfasdf1231234 ( talk) 16:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Nev, I was rewriting the section on the fort and changing it to history, but when I tried to save it there was an edit conflict as you'd had the same idea. I've saved my bit under the heading of "History" but there may be some duplication, however a bit of editing should sort it out. I won't be doing much, more today but I'll probably get back to it tomorrow if I have time. Richerman ( talk) 16:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
I can't believe this injustice!... It's OK, I've done it before myself. -- Jza84 | Talk 22:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions! - Mailer Diablo 11:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions! - Mailer Diablo 17:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for resolving the block situation - I didn't know where/how to do so. FYI my knowledge of WP comes from months of anon I-P editing at Scotland, (prior to the the protection), Flag of Scotland, Royal coat of arms of Scotland, (a few other Royal heraldry related articles), and Shanwick Oceanic Control. The protection placed at the Scotland article finally persuaded me to log in for the alternative was exclusion. Hope that allays any suspicions you may have. Endrick Shellycoat ( talk) 08:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much. I've been trying very hard to get something done with this page, only to be called a vandal and be accused of ignorance. The page has everything needed to become a great page, but... You said it correctly, I am beginning to feel like I'm butting my head against a wall. It's clear the two IPs are related and not interested in doing anything to change the page. I appreciate your effort to protect the page, but more so, in voicing support. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 22:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
It's fantastic! Nothing's missed out in my opinion.... apart from (and we've discussed this before)... the possibility of running a recall - checking who is still active on WP. Bar that, I love the summary of each article and all the ideas you have about a space where we could talk about something we've worked on, are working on, or plan to work on.
I'm still toying with the idea of a North West England newsletter too really. Rationale being that the alternative set of eyes would help each other, and it would bond GM, Cheshire and (I must set this up this month) the Merseyside projects. Any thoughts on that? -- Jza84 | Talk 23:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
I think Ashton CC has won the Wood Cup four times. See here. Regards, Mr Stephen ( talk) 17:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thanks Victuallers ( talk) 16:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
--its added but on random ... Victuallers ( talk) 17:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
The
August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I normally wouldn't question pastscape as a source. However, I find the date of AD 43 for the establishment of the fort at Templeborough hard to believe. The main Roman invasion of Britain has only just begun in AD 43 and took them a number of years to push north. Pastscape is the only source that I have ever seen that dates Templeborough to AD 43. When I initially started the article, the consensus among online sources seemed to be AD 55 (see for example [1], [2], & [3]). This is around the time of the first military exchanges between the Brigantes and the Romans (see Brigantes). Other published sources (e.g. [4], pp. 47–48) date the fort to around AD 70 when Quintus Petillius Cerialis began his campaign against the Brigantes. In truth I think that all sources are just speculating—so maybe it would be safest to give the date of establishment as the 1st century AD. Thanks, — Jeremy ( talk) 20:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
-- Smashville BONK! 23:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Just want to let you know I am reviewing your article, Henry Taylor (swimmer), for GA. Regards, — Mattisse ( Talk) 19:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for taking some time to look at and edit Bishop Auckland last week. I was wondering if you could give some advice on what work is likely to be needed to get the article to good article and beyond? Thanks again for your help Pit-yacker ( talk) 17:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Nev; yes, I think it's time to nominate at WP:FL. The main issue had been the lack of opening date of Manchester United Football Ground, but I managed to check this in the Butt book the other week. As far as I can see, everything in the list looks accurate, and the lead section seems to be suitable. Refs look OK as well. I'll let Joshii and Jza84 know (they created much of the content), and list it tonight or tomorrow. Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!) 18:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello there Nev1! I have a request and rather large favour to ask of you, admin-to-admin. I've been presented with a case of sockpuppetry, one which a checkuser has failed to provide a result. The case has been aptly put together here.
What I was hoping for is if you could spend a short time reading the case, and then get back to me with your thoughts (perhaps by e-mail if you prefer). I'm inclined to agree that this is a confirmed case of sockpuppetry, but as I've been involved, and I'm prepared to make the block, I wanted a second opinion. Could you help? I'll probably ask User:Ddstretch too. -- Jza84 | Talk 16:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
(<-) Checkuser confirmed our suspicions - he was a sockpuppet of a long term abusive user. :) -- Jza84 | Talk 11:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your work to Hugh Mason, but wondered one thing: Stalybridge 1817, Lancashire or Cheshire? I'm unsure. :S -- Jza84 | Talk 21:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
(<-) Hello there!
As I see it, you're both right and yet, could be wrong too. Yes, these images are ancient and so copyright wouldn't normally apply, however, (and here's what I've been told in good faith), some groups assert that they own the copyright of the images by way of them being modern photographs, that happen to be of ancient work (if you follow), which is sneaky.
It might be worth asking an expert in that field though. I'm sure there's a fair use/copyright noticeboard on WP somewhere, that could help. -- Jza84 | Talk 22:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
The September 2008
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please
vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 17:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Keep up the good work! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Good job on that BTW. Definately haunted, I can tell by just looking at a place whether it is or not. See Borley Rectory too! The Bald One White cat 20:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Nev1, thanks for the help with the article and please continue :) I didn't want to seem rude and just remove it but there was never a connection between the MBB canal and the Rochdale canal - the only access to the Rochdale was via the Irwell, and through the Manchester and Salford Junction Canal, or via the Bridgewater Canal also from the Irwell. Parrot of Doom ( talk) 13:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I've added a load more info and references. Do you think the history section could do with splitting up? I'm thinking of resubmitting it but could use another trained eye to have a look before I do that. I'm wondering if it makes sense to reorganise the references so the little numbers are in order, but I'm not sure if thats overkill or not :) Parrot of Doom ( talk) 18:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Woody ( talk) 21:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 08:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for touching up
Hylton Castle, especially for streamlining the refs - I had no idea I could do that that could be done. It's really appreciated :-)
Craigy (
talk) 00:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
I've just made a few comments on the article's talk page. It needs a bit of work yet to get through GA I think, so a very wise decision not to nominate it for FAC. :-) -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 19:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
The
June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 19:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! -- PeterSymonds (talk) 09:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I've had a first run through Warwick Castle, and made a few changes. As ever, if you don't agree with any of them, feel free to revert. I'll probably have another run through over the weekend.
I don't think you'll get picked up over comprehensiveness at FAC, but I did struggle a few times with trying to follow the narrative flow. For instance:
It's hard to give feedback without appearing to be negative, but I really don't mean to be at all. I think that with just a bit more tinkering this would make a very plausible FAC. BTW, I don't know if you noticed, but you were right about Ordsall Hall. Sailed through its GA nomination. :-) -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 21:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, in regards to the query on how to rephrase "The current castle, built in stone during the reign of King Henry II, is on the same site as the earlier Norman motte-and-bailey castle.", I rethought about my opinion. I now think it should be fine since the motte-and-bailey concept encompass the walled-in village. I see that Malleus is copy-editing the article and I think he is doing well, so good luck on your FAC! Jappalang ( talk) 22:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
It may me not understanding, but how is this: "It is traditionally associated with the earldom of Warwick, one of the oldest in England, although it was not in their possession between the early 17th and mid-18th centuries. The castle was owned by the Greville family until the 1970s", consistent with this: "In 1604, the ruinous castle was given to Sir Fulke Greville ... When the title of Earl of Warwick was created for the third time in 1618, the Greville family were still in possession of Warwick Castle; the Grevilles retained ownership of the castle until it was sold to The Tussauds Group in 1978."? -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 01:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks again for your comments -
Forksville Covered Bridge made
featured article today! Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC) |
---|
Hi, best of luck with the FAC and thanks for an excellent article on my local castle. Graham. GrahamColm Talk 18:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support, especially going to the effort of editing the article yourself. Nev1 ( talk) 21:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 10:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Please see my response to your GA review of Stages of growth model. -- Rmrfstar ( talk) 15:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Am I right in thinking that you've been offered a nomination before? If so, I wish for you to reconsider. I know we've not interacted that much and our occasional discussion has been limited to the project talk page but I've found your editing and communication skills are excellent; both traits I'm sure the community would love to see all administrators have. I hope you contemplate this offer and if you decline, it won't matter that much. :) Rud get 11:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Just a reminder that RfA is a brutal and often senseless process, I got this oppose because I asked the admin why he'd blanked my RfA nomination page. If I was American, I might be inclined to say "go figure". But I'm not, so I won't. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 23:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I reviewed your GA nom for Mamucium and put it on hold until some issues, mainly with the clarity, are resolved. You can see my recommendations on the bottom of the talk page. :) Intothewoods29 ( talk) 21:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the speedy response. The article is much better, so I promoted to Good Article! :D Intothewoods29 ( talk) 22:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi , I was thinking of creating a public domain plan of Warwick Castle, which would allow the fair use one in the article to be replaced. I just wanted to check that you did not have anything planned, I don't want to go stepping on any toes whilst a WP:FAC was underway. I also wondered if you know of any other sources of plans. I have a number of satellite photos (Google maps is particularly good), the only map source of the rooms I have is the image you uploaded. GameKeeper ( talk) 21:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I know you're busy with Warwick Castle, but if you can spare a few moments could you take a quick look at Trafford Park? I know the lead needs to be expanded, but I prefer to do that at the end. The Governance and Decline regeneration sections still need a little bit more work, and of course a map would be nice ... hang on, I think I've answered my own question. Any other suggestions you have would be gratefully received—I've had this one on the back-burner for too long, so I'd like to see it finished, or at least at GA anyway. Thanks. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 22:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The
July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 02:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! Just thought I'd let you know that there is a Sale set of photographs at Flickr that has suitable licencing for upload to commons. It is found here. They're not perfect, but they may be useful. I can trim or touch-up if you want me to. :) -- Jza84 | Talk 12:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck for your RFA -- Tinu Cherian - 13:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
This is not the kind of thing you really ought to be saying during your RfA. :lol: -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 18:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
I was very tempted to post a faux- Uw-hblock here for this "outburst", but then thought that some might actually think you've been blocked!!... I don't think you'd forgive me if it stubbed out your RFA! :D -- Jza84 | Talk 19:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
No worries, mate. Scarian Call me Pat! 14:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Tell me about it... page numbers, boy. Not good. I mean the Oldham article will be a toughy as most of those books I had to get especially from the library! Even when I did a masters degree I didn't need to cite the page numbers! Oh well...
I'll take a look at things tonight for Sale, and I'll even look through my books for some factoids to add (I have a few pan-Greater Manchester books). Its looking very very healthy now though I have to say. Did you notice the links to geograph above, one of which has a free-to-use shot of (what I think is) the parish church? Might be handy. :) -- Jza84 | Talk 15:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your RfA passing! Here are some useless useful links for you:
If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a line and I (or another experienced admin) will be more than happy to help you out.
Congrats again!
EVula //
talk //
☯ // 19:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
(oh, and don't delete the
Main Page)
Congratulations from me too. It's well deserved. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 21:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I dont know why your talkpage is on my Watchlist, but I saw how you'd been made an Admin. Congratulations! All the best! Police,Mad,Jack ( talk · contribs)☺ 15:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hopefully fixed now: but they may need formatting. Lozleader ( talk) 20:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Why not comprimise with both? I do not see why the List of London is the benchmark. Can you point out why this is the case? ( Archangel1 ( talk) 20:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)).
Fair point. At least you had the common courtesy to reply in a recent manner. These list articles have numerous problems and this highlights it again. I do not agree with the answer but I've grown weary of trying to prove my point. ( Archangel1 ( talk) 20:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)).
Sorry to see that Sale still hasn't been promoted to FA, but it's surely close now. I think the copyediting effort was left too late, and I just haven't been able to spend the time I wanted to on it over the last few days. But after a couple of weeks timeout I'm sure we can get it through next time. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 22:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I do have a copy of Arrowsmith. I was reading it this week with that very task in mind. The task is complicated a bit by Stockport the town being utterly absorbed into Stockport the metropolitan borough - I can't find a modern map that shows the town. I don't get the time that I once did, but I'll try to come up with a decent section. Regards, Mr Stephen ( talk) 18:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry I can't be of more help, but I made most of that article from what was posted on their pages. However, it is highly likely to be the 4th largest, as the Westfield London is yet to be completed, so I'd use that for now. You may wish to contact User:Joshii as I believe he was the one who updated the figure for the Trafford Centre. Thanks, Asdfasdf1231234 ( talk) 16:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Nev, I was rewriting the section on the fort and changing it to history, but when I tried to save it there was an edit conflict as you'd had the same idea. I've saved my bit under the heading of "History" but there may be some duplication, however a bit of editing should sort it out. I won't be doing much, more today but I'll probably get back to it tomorrow if I have time. Richerman ( talk) 16:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
I can't believe this injustice!... It's OK, I've done it before myself. -- Jza84 | Talk 22:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions! - Mailer Diablo 11:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions! - Mailer Diablo 17:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for resolving the block situation - I didn't know where/how to do so. FYI my knowledge of WP comes from months of anon I-P editing at Scotland, (prior to the the protection), Flag of Scotland, Royal coat of arms of Scotland, (a few other Royal heraldry related articles), and Shanwick Oceanic Control. The protection placed at the Scotland article finally persuaded me to log in for the alternative was exclusion. Hope that allays any suspicions you may have. Endrick Shellycoat ( talk) 08:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much. I've been trying very hard to get something done with this page, only to be called a vandal and be accused of ignorance. The page has everything needed to become a great page, but... You said it correctly, I am beginning to feel like I'm butting my head against a wall. It's clear the two IPs are related and not interested in doing anything to change the page. I appreciate your effort to protect the page, but more so, in voicing support. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 22:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
It's fantastic! Nothing's missed out in my opinion.... apart from (and we've discussed this before)... the possibility of running a recall - checking who is still active on WP. Bar that, I love the summary of each article and all the ideas you have about a space where we could talk about something we've worked on, are working on, or plan to work on.
I'm still toying with the idea of a North West England newsletter too really. Rationale being that the alternative set of eyes would help each other, and it would bond GM, Cheshire and (I must set this up this month) the Merseyside projects. Any thoughts on that? -- Jza84 | Talk 23:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
I think Ashton CC has won the Wood Cup four times. See here. Regards, Mr Stephen ( talk) 17:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thanks Victuallers ( talk) 16:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
--its added but on random ... Victuallers ( talk) 17:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
The
August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I normally wouldn't question pastscape as a source. However, I find the date of AD 43 for the establishment of the fort at Templeborough hard to believe. The main Roman invasion of Britain has only just begun in AD 43 and took them a number of years to push north. Pastscape is the only source that I have ever seen that dates Templeborough to AD 43. When I initially started the article, the consensus among online sources seemed to be AD 55 (see for example [1], [2], & [3]). This is around the time of the first military exchanges between the Brigantes and the Romans (see Brigantes). Other published sources (e.g. [4], pp. 47–48) date the fort to around AD 70 when Quintus Petillius Cerialis began his campaign against the Brigantes. In truth I think that all sources are just speculating—so maybe it would be safest to give the date of establishment as the 1st century AD. Thanks, — Jeremy ( talk) 20:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
-- Smashville BONK! 23:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Just want to let you know I am reviewing your article, Henry Taylor (swimmer), for GA. Regards, — Mattisse ( Talk) 19:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for taking some time to look at and edit Bishop Auckland last week. I was wondering if you could give some advice on what work is likely to be needed to get the article to good article and beyond? Thanks again for your help Pit-yacker ( talk) 17:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Nev; yes, I think it's time to nominate at WP:FL. The main issue had been the lack of opening date of Manchester United Football Ground, but I managed to check this in the Butt book the other week. As far as I can see, everything in the list looks accurate, and the lead section seems to be suitable. Refs look OK as well. I'll let Joshii and Jza84 know (they created much of the content), and list it tonight or tomorrow. Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!) 18:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello there Nev1! I have a request and rather large favour to ask of you, admin-to-admin. I've been presented with a case of sockpuppetry, one which a checkuser has failed to provide a result. The case has been aptly put together here.
What I was hoping for is if you could spend a short time reading the case, and then get back to me with your thoughts (perhaps by e-mail if you prefer). I'm inclined to agree that this is a confirmed case of sockpuppetry, but as I've been involved, and I'm prepared to make the block, I wanted a second opinion. Could you help? I'll probably ask User:Ddstretch too. -- Jza84 | Talk 16:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
(<-) Checkuser confirmed our suspicions - he was a sockpuppet of a long term abusive user. :) -- Jza84 | Talk 11:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your work to Hugh Mason, but wondered one thing: Stalybridge 1817, Lancashire or Cheshire? I'm unsure. :S -- Jza84 | Talk 21:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
(<-) Hello there!
As I see it, you're both right and yet, could be wrong too. Yes, these images are ancient and so copyright wouldn't normally apply, however, (and here's what I've been told in good faith), some groups assert that they own the copyright of the images by way of them being modern photographs, that happen to be of ancient work (if you follow), which is sneaky.
It might be worth asking an expert in that field though. I'm sure there's a fair use/copyright noticeboard on WP somewhere, that could help. -- Jza84 | Talk 22:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
The September 2008
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please
vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 17:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Keep up the good work! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Good job on that BTW. Definately haunted, I can tell by just looking at a place whether it is or not. See Borley Rectory too! The Bald One White cat 20:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)