• Talk archive 1
• Talk archive 2
• Talk archive 3
• Talk archive 4
• Talk archive 5
• Talk archive 6
• Talk archive 7
• Talk archive 8

Note: I will respond to you here.

How you doing? Are you in Canada? I need a good administrator, somebody neutral, i am having problem with arafat site, this confuised individual keeps on reverting arafat's page, link to jerusalem which is of importance, otherwise, it's incomplete biography, i will tell you much more later and i have other concerns, hopefully you know some other administrators, we can do something together, also, how to report bad administrators, how to kick them out?

http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Yasser_Arafat&diff=88678086&oldid=88675033 If you go under arafat history this guy keeps on reverting,so I want to know, am I right or wrong here, if I am wrong, then what is right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.99.3.172 ( talk • contribs)

Hi Montrealais, Please note that this user is continously violating concensus against adding this information, which he is citing from a source which is not reputable. He has vandalized my user page several times and one of his other IP's is currently blocked (64.107.3.104). Thanks, -- Strothra 22:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Note, I fully reject the above statement, i posted on his site not to do what he is doing, the above user is vandal, has 10 accounts and was blocked 10 times, be very careful, i always provide BEST POSSIBLE LINKS and if you look under links under arafat you will know he died in france and they issued death certificate, born in Jerusalem, strothra should not be allowed on wiki anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.99.3.172 ( talk • contribs)

What??? This has got to stop. You can see his block log here [1] -- Strothra 22:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Yasser_Arafat&diff=88693006&oldid=88691470 As you can see, information was correct, I simply added information about his death, correct death certificate and possibility of birth in Jerusalem, is that vandalism, or is that only a try to make wikipedia more accurate that never was or is nor will be>? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.99.3.246 ( talk • contribs)

You have no idea how little I'm interested in this argument. Get dispute resolution if you like, but stop having your argument on my talk page. - Montréalais 04:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply

The argument was resolved once I requested the page to be protected as well as my userpage to stop his vandalism. I realize that it's annoying for you; my last edits to your talk page were simply to add the unsigned tag and to restore my comment which he edited. -- Strothra 18:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Ok, so you are an administrator? Great help you are, no, nothing has been resolved.

You're welcome. I'm not a dispute resolver. - Montréalais 20:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply

So why are u administrator, you gave me some link as throwing an old bone to the dog to eat it, what good is that link if i cant find good administrator to look over arafat? DO u recommend some administrator?

I just wondered if you saw my /Talk_archive_8#Valiants_Memorial_photo request before you archived it. Canadiana 22:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Yes, I did. I don't see anything wrong with your French, but I'm the wrong person to ask for perfection in written French. - Montréalais 00:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I'm not concerned about perfection. As long as there don't seem to be obvious errors, I'm happy. Canadiana 05:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi there. I suggest December 9 for a new Wikipedian meeting. Thank you for specifying whether you can or not at this address. Thank you. -- Liberlogos 18:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply

I saw your name listed on Wikiproject Illustration or the list of graphic artists, and I thought I'd let you know that a Graphics Lab has been created on EN. Based on the highly successful French and German graphics labs, it seeks to better organise and coordinate our graphic design and photo-editing efforts. Up until now, there has been no common space on EN where users could ask for maps, charts and other SVG files to be created. What's more, the Graphics Lab has discussion boards, tips, tools and links; in sum, a good common workspace. Come help us out! The infrastucture is already in place, and now we need participants. :) -- Zantastik talk 02:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply

The article Basque Country (historical territory), to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup. If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page. You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

On December 13, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Women in the 39th Canadian Parliament, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Keep up the great work Montrealais. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 07:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi! You are invited to contribute to the determination of the next date for the Montreal wikipedian meetings at this address. I would also appreciate you giving me your email address and telephone number for faster contact with members when necessary (if you agree to provide them, do send this to my email address through Wikipedia). Finally, please tell me the best and fastest way to reach you: by email address, English-language Wikipedia talk page, French-language Wikipedia talk page, home phone, cellular phone, or other. Thanks! -- Liberlogos 23:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Hey, I saw your edit to Civil Unions in Austria, and wanted to invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies. We'd be delighted to have you aboard. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Sure I can't persuade you to join? I think you'd be a great asset to our WikiProject. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 08:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Oh come ON, you just added an article to our watchlist! Could you at least reply to my invitation? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't usually join things, but thank you for the invitation anyway. - Montréalais 03:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Nb-coat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 02:50 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Hello, Montrealais. See my reason, for why this article should be deleted. PS- I was getting lonely, waiting for someone to discuss the issue with me. GoodDay 20:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Greetings: Can you furnish additional information on the building (city, date built, formal name of building, architect)? Please post it to the image page and let me know, l will add the info to Postmodern architecture. Nice image!

Thanks, Leonard G. 18:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Visit 1000 de La Gauchetière, linked to in the image's page, and all will be revealed. - Montréalais 02:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Leonard G. 20:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi Montrealais! Just in case you didn't know, Metro Bilbao is going to open two new stations in line 2, Abatxolo and Portugalete... TOMORROW! so it would be good if you update the map. Greets! David 11:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, i just woould like to know if you are the owner of this image ? Someone upload it on the french Wikipédia, and if you can, please upload it on Commons, else, ill do it. Can you aswer me on my french talk page ? Thanks a lot. - fr:user:bayo. 193.248.36.151 00:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC) reply

oups, i just read "Photo by Montrealais" :D. Thanks a lot, ill move it on Commons now. 193.248.36.151 00:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC) reply

I have proposed a category for deletion, which was created by you: Category:Rivers named for women Bards 11:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Gracias por tu mapa del metro. Ben ^T/ _C 20:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi there. Checking through the history of the article Same-sex marriage in Spain I found out you were the user that initially created that article. I just thought you'd might like to know that it recently became a FA. :) Cheers Raystorm 16:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Qc-coat-thb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi. Please help. I've had some difficulty with uploading images taken by other photographers and posted on other websites.

In two different cases, I wrote to the photographer and copyright holder asking their permission, and they wrote back granting it. When I uploaded the images, I selected "The copyright holder gave me permission to use this work only in Wikipedia articles". In both cases, I pasted the photographer's name and the image URL into the space provided along with the text of their e-mail to me granting permission. In both cases, the images were deleted almost immediately.

What can I do differently that would allow me to post these images? Thank you, Peter 04:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi. Montrealais, there is a "intense discussion" (that's, obviously, an euphemism for "nasty war") about the Comunidad Valenciana name in English. Apparently, some Valencian autonomous office itself (the department for tourism) has occasionally translated as "Land of Valencia", I guess trying to avoid the non-sense "Community" may mean to English speakers not familiarized with the Spanish "Autonomous Communities" system. Some users (none of them English native speakers) are clinging to this translation for political reasons which this is not the place to introduce, at least right now. However, I have read some opinions by English native speakers despising that translation as clumsy, even "illiterate". As per these native speakers, apparently the right translation could be Community of Valencia, but I don't know. Do you have an opinion? Thanks. Mountolive | Talk 06:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC) reply

p.s. probably "do you have an opinion"? is not the best question, as I heard somewhere that opinions are like asses: everyone's got one ;)

"Land of Valencia" sounds ridiculous. IMHO it should either be "Comunitat Valenciana" or "Valencian Community," preferably the latter. The title the article has now is about as good as we're likely to get. But you'll forgive me if I don't get involved in that particular nightmare of a debate. Believe me, if I ever move to Spain as I've been thinking of, I'm going to be keeping my fool mouth shut. - Montréalais 08:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Thank you, Montréalais. There is a voting going on now in [2] Based in your opinion and others, the matter seems to be close to a happy ending. I know you don't want to get much involved but you may be interested in having a quick look at the page and cast your vote there. Thanks again. Mountolive | Talk 18:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

p.s. actually, don't bother, man: the situation is as fucked up as ever. Thanks anyway Mountolive | Talk 02:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Oh God, I don't know who did it (please send me a sign if you were ;) but someone has made vandalizing one of the fine arts in the lead of this article. And what is even better: one of the usual Catalanists has gone after the superb vandalizing....and has fixed a TYPO!! hahahaha, nationalists are sometimes the cutest creatures on Earth....Go check it right now!! And give me a sign if... ;) ~~

Hi Montrealais. I noticed you were in at the start of this article on the lead up to the war, and I thought you might be able to help me. What I'm looking for is a record of the pre-March '03 Wikipedia discussions about reports of the governments' WMD claims. I'd just like to see how well NPOV was being applied by editors before the lack of WMDs became clear. So many articles have sprung up following the war that it's difficult to locate where the original discussions might have taken place. I'd appreciate it if you pointed me in the right direction. Thanks.-- Shtove 21:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I didn't get involved in those discussions and I'm not sure where they might be found. - Montréalais 21:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Oh. You're quick! Thanks.-- Shtove 21:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, I have nominated Image:Madrid-metro-map.png, an image you created, for delisting from Wikipedia:Featured pictures as the image is no longer used in an article. It formerly illustrated Madrid Metro but has been superseded by Image:Red de metro de Madrid.svg. Feel free to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Madrid-metro-map.png. -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 22:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, could you update your map of Bilbao Metro? Since January 20, 2007 the line 2 has two more stations, Abatxolo and Portugalete. Thanks and best regards, -- Jcornelius 11:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi Matthew. Following the recent events of the NDP, I wrote an article in French about Micheline Montreuil. I have produced a rough draft of an English translation. In my research, to my pleasant surprise, I noticed that you were Co-President of the LGBTT Commission of NPD-Québec and that, as such, you had issued an official comment on this choice of candidate.

I was already thinking of asking someone to review my draft for language. Since you are probably better informed than I about your Co-President and since I trust your language abilities, a quick review of yours of the draft would be an honour, if you have the time. I am wondering, for example, about the correct use of "transgender" and/or "transgendered". Add any appropriate fact you wish. If you wish to have credit when the article goes live, I can write it in the description of the first edit or anything else. Thanks! -- Liberlogos 05:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

P.S.: Why do I get the feeling you are not unrelated to the choice of a Montreal Metro picture on the Commission website?

Furthermore, the press release from the Commision [3] states that "If she is elected, she will be the third transgender MP in the world, after Georgina Beyer in New Zealand and Vladimir Luxuria in Italy", but I also see two other people that could possibly be considered: Aya Kamikawa and Shabnam Mausi. Mistake of the release or something else? -- Liberlogos 06:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the question. I'll have a look at the draft but judging from your French article it ought to be fine. Aya Kamikawa is a city councillor and Shabnam Mausi is a member of a regional assembly, not national. - Montréalais 14:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I have reviewed your draft and found no real problems with your discussion of trans issues; I've just made a few improvements in style and added a few links. - Montréalais 14:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

So it was my mistake, delete it if you think you should. Thanks. 亮HH 14:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi! My name's Evan -- I'm a longtime Wikipedian and an adoptive Montrealer. I'm writing because I'm one of the organizers of the upcoming RoCoCoCamp event; 18-20 May 2007. RoCoCoCamp is the Montreal version of RecentChangesCamp, a BarCamp-style unconference centered around wiki technology, culture and communities. I've posted on the Quebec Wikipedians' notice board, but I'd like to make sure that you have a personal invitation to attend. Your long experience as a Wikipedian would be a great contribution to the event.

If you think you can attend, please sign up on the Participants list. I'm particularly proud that the local wiki community is able to organize this international event; I hope you can give us the support we need to make it a success. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my user page here, by email at evan@prodromou.name, or however else you'd like. -- ESP 17:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I am sure I know you, don't I, my old friend...? or should I say "your majesty"? -- Pedro Aguiar 07:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Coat of arms of Nunavut.png, by Strangerer, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Coat of arms of Nunavut.png is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Coat of arms of Nunavut.png, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Coat of arms of Nunavut.png itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 08:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for clearing up my translation of "Allez vous faire soigne". It makes more sense now. gren グレン 04:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC) reply

I was hoping one day there could be a featured topic about Canadian rapid transit. The idea came to me after working hard on the SkyTrain article (which is now an FAC). The metro article is good, but lacks inline citation. I knew your website was a good place to start looking for some reliable sources, but now that I see the webmaster on Wikipedia, I see it as a better place to start. Perhaps you can lend a hand in get the Metro article back up to GA quality? Sources are the only thing that's wrong with it. Thanks. — Selmo ^{( talk)} 22:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC) reply

The image you uploaded at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ns-coat-thb.jpg was seemingly taken from a site that should *not* have been distributing the Coat of Arms. The Coat of Arms has very restricted use and the copyright info/license supplied was also incorrect. The image needs to be deleted; a new image (from government, and being the actual coat of arms instead of the reproduction that was previously up) has been uploaded.

I didn't upload this image to Commons. - Montréalais 15:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mr., by Clicketyclack ( talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mr. is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mr., please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 13:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Barcelona metro line 10, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Barcelona Metro line 9. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 03:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Canadian House of Commons has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. -- RelHistBuff 07:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm contacting you out of courtesy as you have contributed to the page and may wish to supply your own citations. If you feel this doesn't matter to you, please ignore it. This page was rated as a Good Article, but has been downgraded because nobody did the donkeywork of listing the attributions to the various statements provided, which is after all a fairly serious dereliction of duty in what's suppoed to be a historical record. Having discussed the withdrawal of GA with LuciferMorgan, I give notice that I am sitting down with the three classic original source texts (Puylaurens, Vaux-de-Cernay and de Tudèle - the last in the Livre de Poche edition as the Martin-Chabot is long out of print) to add the missing inline citations to this page. I do not intend at this point to make any textual alterations, but if comments are made which are NOT justified, be prepared to state your sources now.

Jel 21:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Ns-coat.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Ns-coat.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Ns-coat.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 21:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC) reply

I have nominated Dax (Star Trek), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dax (Star Trek). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. AnmaFinotera ( talk) 07:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pei-coat.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Save_Us_ 229 01:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for adding the English to List of papal bulls, it adds a lot to the page! Any idea how many bulls there are, in total? It would help to get a sense of that, in terms of how to best organize the page for future growth. -- El on ka 07:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Work has re-started to get a chapter of Wikimedia happening in Canada. I'm concerned that there are very few Quebecois participating. Are you interested in getting involved? http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Canada -- ESP ( talk) 15:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC) reply

For your consideration.... Please pass on to any Montreal Wikis you may be aware of and who are not yet listed as interested, may be interested, or not interested. Peter Horn 00:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply

These people who keep adding a picture of Darth Vader to your article: are these friends of yours trying to be funny, or do you have anonymous detractors kicking around somewhere? Just curious. Bearcat ( talk) 09:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I haven't the faintest idea who it is. If it's someone I know, nobody's confessed to it. - Montréalais ( talk) 18:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply

There has been a suggestion here to rename Champagne Supernova (astronomy). As the creator of the article, I'd like your input! Thanks. -- Falcorian  ^(talk) 15:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Canadian-coins.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I am moving this to Commons. Please ensure you upload all free images there in future (and if you really want to be nice, you could move some of your old uploads there too using CommonsHelper). Thanks. Richard001 ( talk) 23:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks so much for your addition to Gender. Since gender is an English theft from French, it is particularly helpful to have the current French terminology. Au revoir! :) Alastair Haines ( talk) 02:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wash-dc-metro-yellow.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wash-dc-metro-red.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wash-dc-metro-orange.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wash-dc-metro-blue.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wash-dc-metro-green.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Ville-souterraine-1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Ville-souterraine-1.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs ( talk) 10:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm doing a little research on the origin and usage of the nonstandard term 'demonym' which is widely used on Wikipedia. I see that you created the Demonym page five years ago. I'm trying to track down its first usage and was wondering where you first came across the word. Have you by any chance read Labels for Locals by Paul Dickson?
Thanks for your time. Ulmanor ( talk) 13:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi, I am wondering if I can use one of your photos in an insturctional teachers DVD. The DVD will teach kids about the democratic system in Canada. The picture is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Parliament2.jpg If I can use the picture, what copyright text did you want me to put beside the image? Thanks! " Isthisnameinuse ( talk) 15:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)" reply

Sorry...I'm new at this. Hi, I am wondering if I can use one of your photos in an instructional teachers DVD. The DVD will teach kids about the democratic system in Canada. The picture is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Parliament2.jpg If I can use the picture, what copyright text did you want me to put beside the image? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isthisnameinuse ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC) reply

and apparently am no good at it! Here is my contact info " Isthisnameinuse ( talk) 15:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)" reply

Bonjour "Montrealais".

Je m'appelle Gabriel Moginot, je suis photographe de mode (professionnel) à Paris. Je suis désolé de vous déranger, mais j'ai un gros problème, et je fais une dernière tentative de le régler amicalement en vous contactant, avant de porter plainte lundi prochain contre la société Wikimédia. J'ai choisi de vous contacter car vous parlez francais, vous avez fait des études dans l'art, et vous soutenez les transexuels (j'ai contribuer à l'article d'Amanda Lepore, personne que j'aime beaucoup, l'illustration de son article est une partie de mon travail photo sur elle) Sachez que j'ai contacté les jours précedents : Mike Godwin (avocat pour Wikimedia je crois) et Cary Bass (personne qui se charge de régler les conflits, mais qui ne me répond pas). Je me dis que vous comprendrez peut être ma position, et que vous pourrez peut être agir, ou me diriger vers la personne qui saura agir.

J'ai créé il y a peu de temps un compte utilisateur "Gabriel Moginot" et j'ai contribué en illustrant et améliorant des articles sur la mode ou les célébrités. Les images que j'ai offert à Wiki Commons pour l'illustration sont un travail professionnel, considérées comme des oeuvres d'art (j'ai un statut d'artiste). Lors de mes contributions sur Wikipédia, j'ai donné une description de l'image en lien avec l'article, et j'ajoutais mon crédit de photographe, c'est à dire mon nom.

Sur wikipédia, il existe des textes pour expliquer comment afficher, aligner, définir la taille d'une image, etc. Mais rien n'existe pour dire si oui ou non un artiste peut signer son oeuvre (illustration j'entend). Je me suis fait rappeler à l'ordre sous prétexte d'auto-promotion, mais cherchant à expliquer que la notion professionnelle de mes images qui possèdent un droit d'auteur devrait m'autoriser à présenter mon nom (comme la signature d'un tableau par exemple), je me suis fait bloquer et censurer (j'ai posté des messages pour demander une réponse claire basée sur les règles d'utilisation de ce site (des textes écrits et non pas l'avis partagé de quelques personnes), mais ces questions ont été supprimées par certains adminitrateurs). Je me suis donc fait bloquer sur les Wikipédias anglais et francais.

J'ai créé un deuxième compte "Vogue Magazine - Style com" afin de me reconnecter, mais là encore on m'a bloqué sous pretexte que c'est un "faux-nez".

Mes images sont actuellement utilisées par Wikipédia de manière frauduleuse car j'ai le droit à afficher mon nom d'artiste sous ces illustrations (puisque aucun texte ne l'interdit), ce droit ma été refusé sans vrai jugement, car personne ne peux me montrer qu'une règle l'interdit. Je me suis fait traiter de "spammeur", ce qui est faux. Je ne compte même plus le nombre de censures, ainsi que la mauvaise foi à ne pas vouloir me donner une réponse claire basée sur des écrits.

Il s'agit d'une question de violation de droits d'auteur et de censure, je prend celà très au sérieux car il s'agit de défendre mon métier et le droit des artistes en général.

Je souhaite que : - Mes comptes et mon adresse IP soient débloqués, si je ne peux avoir qu'un seul compte, je veux bien que "Vogue Magazine - Style com" soit supprimé. - Qu'une règle autorise de manière internationale à afficher explicitement le crédit d'un artiste professionnel si il contribue à l'illustration d'un article.

Je suis tellement véxé et énervé de voir que même l'avocat de Wikimédia considère ça comme une dispute entre utilisateurs, que si rien ne change, je contacte mon avocat lundi prochain pour attaquer ce site et la société mère Wikimédia, vous pouvez me croire je vais faire du bruit.

Je n'ai rien contre vous (je parle de "vous" en tant que personne "Montrealais"), mais si nous pouvons éviter un bain de sang et rétablir les droits d'auteurs sur ce site, j'oublierais cette histoire. Dans le cas contraire, j'irais jusqu'au bout.

Vous pouvez me contacter ou me répondre directement à cet email : gabrielmoginot@mac.com

Je me connecte actuellement en dehors de chez moi car je ne peux plus agir sur Wikipédia depuis mon ordinateur personnel à cause des différents blocages.

Mille mercis, j'attends votre retour. Gabriel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.251.17.167 ( talk) 12:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi, Barcelona's metro (L5, green line) has been enlarged with 2 new stations: Roquetes and it finishes now in Trinitat Nova (as you can see here and here). Since you draw this map, it would be very kind if you could update it. Thank you! :-) -- Xtv - ( my talk) - ( que dius que què?) 09:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I have already updated. You can check if you like it, or update it yourself otherwise. Cheers-- Xtv - ( my talk) - ( que dius que què?) 11:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello, Montrealais. I come here to inform you a request for move to the article of Empress Myeongseong to Queen Min by an user named Sennen goroshi ( talk · contribs). The pertinent discussion has been open at Talk:Empress Myeongseong#Requested move. Since you seem to be interested in editing the article (long ago though), your input would be appreciated on this. Thanks.-- Caspian blue 00:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply

File:Quebeccity2.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Quebeccity2 (1).jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Quebeccity2 (1).jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 15:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daudelin-island.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November ( talk) 11:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daudelin-odalisque.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November ( talk) 11:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm on the verge of nominating this at Featured Lists. All it needs is references with regard to the three bridges to Repentigny (I might take care of that next week), and a revision of the color scheme of the tables. Since you started this article a few years ago, I was wondering if you had additional suggestions. -- Blanchardb - ^{Me• MyEars• MyMouth}- timed 18:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply

That's been taken care of, and the nomination is under way. -- Blanchardb - ^{Me• MyEars• MyMouth}- timed 23:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply

You may add a star to your user page: the article just got promoted to Featured List status. -- Blanchardb - ^{Me• MyEars• MyMouth}- timed 22:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC) reply

I have nominated Category:Former landmarks in Montreal ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Landmarks in Montreal ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:55, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for trying to revert the anonymous vandalism to the Gideon v. Wainwright article. Unfortunately, you didn’t get it all. Rollback should have caught it all, so I don’t know what happened. I think I managed to get it all — the bits/bytes counts match! And, those anon edits, coupled with other instances of vandalism by that anon, brought her/him up to a Level 4, so I passed it on to WP:AIV. Thanks again! — Spike ( talk) 22:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi there,

I see on your user page that you live in Montreal. I am going to assume that you have heard of Place Ville-Marie in asking you this question. The reports of the number of floors in Place Ville-Marie vary from 43 to 46. Do you, with your Montreal expertise, know the actual number of floors in this structure, or could you possibly visit this building to find out? Thanks,

-Stuck in Edmonton 117Avenue ( talk) 22:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The article Hospital de Sant Pau (Barcelona Metro) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is not on a notable topic, according to the Notability Guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Quinxorin ( talk) 22:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Calder-redmobile.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- J Milburn ( talk) 23:47, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Ignore that, I'm not sure why I read "Montreal" as "the United States"... J Milburn ( talk) 23:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atocha1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atocha2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Quebec-city-protests--couronne.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 08:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rice-stand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 09:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello Montrealais! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Helen Wellington-Lloyd - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 19:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi. I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to the first post I made today in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? I think it's very important. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 02:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Category:Poetasters is proposed for deletion!
Object or support -- voice your view 'ere completion!
Shall Wikipedia ignore the profound connections among all
The glorious rhymsters like William McGonagall,
McIntyre, Moore, McKittrick Ros,
Or J. Gordon Coogler (some might think it a loss),
But others [to comply with WP:CANVASS provisions],
Might deem this deletion a darn good decision.
Decide for yourself, and (here [4]) make your views known,
On the category for poets for badness renowned!
-- JohnWBarber ( talk) 19:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

A review to see if Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom meets Wikipedia:Good article criteria has started, and has been put on hold. Suggestions for improvement are at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/GA2, and are mainly to do with coverage and neutrality, and building the lead section. Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom is one of our most high profile and popular articles, attracting an average of over 11,000 readers every day. You have made more than 20 edits to the article, and so you might be interested in helping to make the improvements needed to get it listed as a Good Article. SilkTork * ^YES! 12:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Greetings! I noticed that you added Brother André to the Roman Catholic Saints category. I thought I would drop you a note before I did anything. I'm just not sure that this should be added yet, as he won't be canonized until October.

While I understand that all things being equal, he WILL become a Saint then, it is not yet done. The fact of the matter is that the Pope could have a heart attack, stroke or hit by a bus between now and then, and the next Pope could decide not to do it, or a myriad of other possibilities.

I'd just like to suggest that we hold off on adding this until it has happened.

What do you think? Dphilp75 ( talk) 15:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, Montrealais,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by 
SoxBot (
talk) 00:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
reply

Thank you! If you need anything you know where I am ;) -- Vilar 21:41, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Category:Poetasters has been nominated for deletion here. Last January, you participated in the previous deletion discussion (which resulted in a no-consensus keep), so you may have an interest in this one. Please consider participating. -- JohnWBarber ( talk) 16:00, 28 July

Hi M.! I sent you an email. Would you please respond to me via email? Thanks. -- CJ Withers ( talk) 11:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC) 2010 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evil reptilian kitten-eater from another planet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Rainjar ( talk) 02:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, Montrealais. You have new messages at Guoguo12's talk page.
Message added 23:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. reply

Guoguo12 --Talk--  23:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Bonjour, est-ce que ce serai possible que vous traduit toute en français dans la page francophone de la première ministre de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador fr:Kathy Dunderdale celle de en:Kathy Dunderdale S.V.P.

Merci et bonne journée

204.237.12.81 ( talk) 01:20, June 4 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour, est-ce que ce serai possible que vous traduit toute en français dans la page francophone de l' fr:Assemblée législative de l'Ontario celle de en:Assembly legislative of Ontario S.V.P.

Merci et bonne journée

204.237.12.81 ( talk) 01:21, June 4 2011 (UTC)

I noticed you are a participant of the WikiProject Quebec.

The Outline of Quebec was created a few days ago and is under vigorous development. It fills a gap in Wikipedia's set of outlines. It is the 3rd outline to date about a Canadian province/territory.

• Wikipedia Contents
  • Outlines
    • Outline of geography
      • Outline of North America
        • Outline of Canada
          • Outline of Alberta
          • Outline of British Columbia
          • Outline of Manitoba
          • Outline of New Brunswick
          • Outline of Newfoundland and Labrador
          • Outline of Nova Scotia
          • Outline of Ontario
          • Outline of Quebec
          • Outline of Prince Edward Island
          • Outline of Saskatchewan
          • Outline of the Northwest Territories
          • Outline of Nunavut
          • Outline of Yukon

Outlines form one of the subsystems of Wikipedia's contents navigation system. For more information on outlines, see Wikipedia:Outlines and Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines.

The goals for the Outline of Quebec is to complete it to as high a standard of quality as possible, and to make it even better than the Outline of Saskatchewan and the Outline of British Columbia.

Once the Outline of Quebec is completed, it will provide an important example to others creating outlines for the remaining provinces and territories of Canada.

Please take a look at the outline to see if you can notice (and fill in) any missing topics. Pictures would also be nice (the rarer and the more interesting, the better).

Thank you.

Sincerely, The Transhumanist 10:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC) reply

I notice that you added to the Gallium article back in 2006 that F. Lecoq de Boisbaudran disputed the claim that he had named the element after himself (gallium < gallus < le coq) in an 1877 journal article. Do you have a reference to this article? A chemist at my institution is doing some research into this eytmology and this reference would be very useful. Thank you! Wade Lee, University of Toledo Libraries (Wade.Lee@utoledo.edu) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.40.112 ( talk) 22:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello I am new in wikipedia and interesting in LGBT related topics too. Recently i added new article called <The flavor of corn>. Its about nice Italian LGBT related film created at 1986. But my article was declined becouse of abcent of external links. To my opinion this is not fair, becouse I mentioned the page from IMD. Please help me to approve this article and make it better. Thanks in advance. The link of article is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Flavor_of_Corn — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.70.13.169 ( talk) 11:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Dear Montrealais,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar -- Jaobar ( talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.206.39 ( talk) 03:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Wishing Montrealais a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk} _{about my edits?} 21:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Barcelona Metro/line list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 22:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Barcelona Metro/next has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Custom succession box system replaced by the standard {{ S-line}} including related Templates: {{ Barcelona Metro/background color}} {{ Barcelona Metro/eastern terminus}} {{ Barcelona Metro/next special}} {{ Barcelona Metro/text color}} {{ Barcelona Metro/western terminus}} Secondarywaltz ( talk) 18:45, 30 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Pouvez-vous enregistrer la prononciation du mot enquête avec un accent québécois S.V.P ? Fête —Preceding undated comment added 00:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Do you knew Quebeckers pronounce "fight" for the word fête ? Fête ( talk) 22:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC) reply

While I've found numerous valid sources for the statement that alderman Joseph Schubert temporarily served as acting mayor of Montreal in 1927, I can't find a source which explains why the city needed an acting mayor in the first place. Specifically, I can't find any sources which explain what, if anything, would have interrupted Médéric Martin's term in office. Do you have any insight into this, or any access to sources which might explain it in more depth? Bearcat ( talk) 22:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, Montrealais. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000 (talk) 19:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC) reply

You are receiving this message because you are listed in the active members list of WikiProject Quebec.

I have made a number of drastic changes to the project in an effort to bring some more life to it. I would appreciate hearing your feedback on these changes here. Thanks! - Sweet Nightmares 19:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Northwest Territories (electoral district) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Territories]]. In 1979, the riding was divided into '''Western Arctic''' and [[Nunatsiaq]] (later [[Nunavut (electoral district)|Nunavut]] ridings. Following the creation of the territory of [
• (Northwest Territories) 2014-"]. ''History of Federal Ridings since 1867.'' Consulted 2014-08-27.</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gullah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mende. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Template:Infobox Paris metro has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox station. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 ( talk • contributions) Use {{ ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 12:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Template:Paris Metro/next has been nominated for merging with Template:S-line. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 ( talk • contributions) Use {{ ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 14:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article House of Commons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Commons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ NottNott let's talk! contrib 18:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

The article List of municipalities in Barcelona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It simply duplicates information already present in Municipalities of Catalonia, which is far more detailed and up-to-date

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rwxrwxrwx ( talk) 21:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The article List of municipalities in Girona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It simply duplicates information already present in Municipalities of Catalonia, which is far more detailed and up-to-date

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rwxrwxrwx ( talk) 21:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The article List of municipalities in Lleida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It simply duplicates information already present in Municipalities of Catalonia, which is far more detailed and up-to-date

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rwxrwxrwx ( talk) 21:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The article List of municipalities in Tarragona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It simply duplicates information already present in Municipalities of Catalonia, which is far more detailed and up-to-date

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rwxrwxrwx ( talk) 21:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Montrealais. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi Montrealais.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Montrealais. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, Montrealais. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Template:Canada House standings/internal header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 23:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Template:Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Independent has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 19:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Template:Canadian politics/swing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 20:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. ( T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. ( T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello. I notice that you've listed Anne-Marie Sigouin and Richard Ryan as the members of the Ville Marie Borough Council directly appointed by the mayor. I don't have any reason to doubt the accuracy of this information, but can you tell me what your source is – I haven't seen anything online that confirms this. CJCurrie ( talk) 07:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Please disregard my question; the city council website has been updated with this information. CJCurrie ( talk) 02:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Montrealais. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

The article Michael Hendricks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon ( talk) 13:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Hendricks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hendricks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon ( talk) 23:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC) reply

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	howdy opt2mistic1 22:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castells ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Montrealais. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC) reply

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of actual Parliamentary Secretaries of Canada. Since you had some involvement with the List of actual Parliamentary Secretaries of Canada redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 07:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC) reply

My name is Matthew O'Mara, I'm a producer with TVO, which is Ontario's public broadcaster. Was doing some wiki diving and came across Ontario's page. I was hoping to speak with a contributor from the page about the research you conducted to create it. If you're interested in talking, shoot me an email momara(at)tvo(dot)org. Or reply here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Momaratvo ( talk • contribs) 18:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaise longue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free association ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ariadne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clue ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pincourt-Terrasse-Vaudreuil station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autoroute 20.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Suffragist. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 21#Suffragists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf ( talk) 20:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R v Zora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Withdrawal.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited De Wallen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trans.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

A token of thanks Hi Montrealais! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u| Sdkb}}  talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. / Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Canadian provinces and territories by area is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canadian provinces and territories by area until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 00:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi -- I'm working on unreferenced articles and got to this one. The edit summary when you made this says "will expand when I get home" -- I was wondering whether you knew of any sources? I did find some on dishes known as "potlatch dishes" or "feast dishes" (e.g. this UBC entry) -- are those the same thing? Gnomingstuff ( talk) 19:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Sadly, I don't recall what my sources were or any other useful information from 14 years ago 😅 Montréalais ( talk) 22:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Expo 67 pavilions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Ronde.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Malcolm II of Scotland has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 ( talk) 02:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dax (Star Trek) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dax (Star Trek) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

― Susmuffin  ^Talk 10:31, 20 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply