This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You have a previous edit on this article or its discussion, so FYI: Talk:Independent Greens of Virginia#Material by editor "PonchoChet". Let's try to make the article better. - Colfer2 ( talk) 20:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 21:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Noticed you wanted to take the Constitution of Virginia to FA. I think it might need a tad bit of work first. Whadda say we work on it together? I am willing to do the footwork and do the massive editing and such. Whatcha say? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:57, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for catching my error in userfying this page. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
"Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Being Bobby Brown, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 03:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)"
I quote you. I'm sorry, I know you have no way of believing me, but I am not the contributor at this Brown page. Someone else has been utilizing this IP address. My IP address is in flux, maybe that is the issue. However I am sorry that such edits were made, as much as I am sorry for you that I am not the editor. As an example of "me", see my work at Claddagh ring. 75.21.107.151 ( talk) 08:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, see this is me now: 75.21.149.48 ( talk) 08:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Kubigula, you are kind, and I appreciate your help. I've been here a LOOONG time- it is best if I keep to my fluctuating IP address and nothing more. Believe me. You seem like a much better, superior worker here...how I wish my old attackers from the days of yore had been more like you. Civil and helpful. I'm sorry to ramble, I'll not take up more space again. 75.21.150.44 ( talk) 09:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- WikiManOne ( talk) 19:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Kubigula. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dancing with the Stars (U.S. Season 12), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Is a plausible, useful redirect or is not a redirect at all. Thank you. Ged UK 20:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
FYI, as a courtesy, because I won't be offering my opinion on anything again at WT:UTM. Kudpung ( talk) 04:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
He once deleted my comments to mock the fliest white guy on the Jamestown article, hope you laughed trust me it was the perect joke to the guy it was for. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
173.238.160.69 (
talk) 23:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and I know you to be broadly clueful, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.
If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).
I hope to hear from you soon.-- Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation ( talk) 17:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula, as I have mentioned at WT:UTM previously, I have been working on a draft in my userspace to try and amalgamate the various disparate WP:UTM pages. It was also suggested in discussions that this would be an opportunity to write a behavioral guideline concerning the design of user warning templates (and user talk namespace templates in general). As this work represents a large structural change to the project, I would like to invite you and other project members and trusted contributors to have some input. The work I have done so far can be seen at User:Pol430/Sandbox/User talk namespace, I would very much like to get other peoples ideas for expansion and improvement. Rather than engage in long, unwieldy discussions about what changes I should make, it would be easier if you were to make any changes you see fitting, directly into my sandbox. Please direct any related discussion to my main user talk page. You can take this message as my permission for you to edit the page User:Pol430/Sandbox/User talk namespace and any sub-pages thereof. If you are to busy or would rather not, don't worry. I won't be offended :) Pol430 talk to me 12:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
You've beat me to reverting vandalism twice tonight, and I think that all your hard work deserves a reward! Sophus Bie ( talk) 04:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC) |
Serak unblocked me because someone unblocked Haymaker. I'm working on the Planned Parenthood article and discussing it on the talk page atm, feel free to step in wherever. W M O 20:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
How can information from the Congressional record be POV? Just because the facts are cited via Will doesn't mean they're vitiated by POV. This is from Senate debate. If it's just a matter of citing it from a source other than Will, then so be it. If not, then explain further. Megarian1973, 17 February 2011 at 05:15.
Sorry it took me forever to reply, I am significantly cutting down in the time I put into wikipedia since it has become apparent that there are pov pushing admins who wield their admin powers to fight content battles. At this point, my main strategy to keep from supposedly edit warring is to edit any one article a maximum of once a day and work my ass of trying to get people to be reasonable on the talk page. Also, I'm going to try and see if I can improve some articles in other content areas as I did before getting caught up with all these pov pushers. W M O Please leave me a wb if you reply 07:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
W M O Please leave me a wb if you reply 05:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Please take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the "Online Mentor" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Why did you remove my name from the Independents listing for Presidential Candidates? Both sections I have been removed and more than once this happened. I want to know why?
This is a violation of Federal Election Laws. Every Candidate has the Right to be seen and heard. If other Candidates are listed, you have to allow me to post my info. The same law goes for all types of advertisements. Every Candidate is given equal opportunity to represent themselves to the public. It is against Federal Election Laws to prevent a Candidate to known to the public.
From the desk of Presidential Candidate
Andrew Francis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aceperce ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
I do apologize for posting this twice, I am new to using Wikipedia and not sure how to remove my posting without a title. I was afraid that it would get lost since it looks to much mixed with the above article.
Why did you remove my name from the Independents listing for Presidential Candidates? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012 I have been removed from Both sections that list Candidates for Presidents for 2012 and more than once this happened. I want to know why?
This is a violation of Federal Election Laws. Every Candidate has the Right to be seen and heard. If other Candidates are listed, you have to allow me to post my info. The same law goes for all types of advertisements. Every Candidate is given equal opportunity to represent themselves to the public. It is against Federal Election Laws to prevent a Candidate to be known to the public.
Thank you
From the desk of Presidential Candidate
Andrew Francis Aceperce ( talk) 17:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Hoax article recreated after your deletion (G1,G3). Time to SALT. Rms125a@hotmail.com ( talk) 23:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I thought you might like to know that
208.101.233.100 (
talk) is an editor that geolocates to the same place as the following IPs (and whose contributions closely resemble theirs as well):
208.101.233.129,
208.101.233.54,
208.101.233.253,
208.101.233.184,
208.101.233.254,
208.101.233.193,
208.101.233.227,
208.101.233.179,
208.101.233.42.
All these IP-editors have similar editing patterns of no edit summaries, no references and no known responses to any talkpage messages/notices/warnings/blocks. This editor (or editors) only edits certain glamourous movie-star articles including
Jayne Mansfield,
Marilyn Monroe,
Dorothy Dandridge along with associated articles such as
Trax Colton,
Too Hot to Handle,
Female Jungle,
Tamango &
The Murder Men (film).*Note: Some of the IPs above were mentioned as part of a blocked user's (Harlow1937)
SPI.
I thought that you probably hadn't realized some of the background on this group of IP-editor/s. There's also been a subsequent
temporary range-block. --
Shearonink (
talk) 04:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Plus Barracking the Obama was uttered. What do you know about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.44.109.225 ( talk) 04:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
How do I make good edits? I am not sure — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.28.49.253 ( talk • contribs)
I think it's time for revdeletes and a removal of talk page access for this user. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey, you just blocked Blorod, can we look at maybe revdeling his contributions? Thanks
Blorod (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
nuke contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
-
Happysailor
(Talk) 01:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on May 14, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 14, 2011. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 20:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Virginia is a U.S. state on the Atlantic Coast of the Southern United States. The state population is over eight million. Its geography and climate are shaped by the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Chesapeake Bay, which are home to much of its flora and fauna. The area's history begins with indigenous settlements and the founding of the Virginia Colony in May 1607 by the London Company as the first permanent New World English colony. Virginia was one of the Thirteen Colonies involved in the American Revolution. During the American Civil War, Virginia joined the Confederate States of America, which named Richmond its capital, and the state of West Virginia separated. The state government is home to the oldest legislature in the Americas, and is unique in how it prohibits its Governors from serving consecutive terms. Virginia's economy has many sectors: agriculture in places like the Shenandoah Valley, federal agencies in Northern Virginia, and military facilities in Hampton Roads. The growth of the media and technology sectors have made computer chips the leading export, with the industry based on the strength of Virginia's public schools and universities. ( more...)
:)
FYI, these users have repeatedly edit warred with each other in the past (see block log for both), and have not got along lately. I have also warned BelloWello about gaming the system per User talk:Kuru#Bello. This is an interesting dispute resolution thing that I want an admin to look at. Thanks. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments on my talk page. If you have a chance, do you mind looking over this article? I think its ready for mainspace but would like a few more eyes on it to confirm that before I move it. I also plan for a DYK hook out of it. BelloWello ( talk) 03:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I saw your recent comment on Vaoverland's page and wanted to let you know that I started a section for him on the Deceased Wikipedians page. I didn't know him very well; please feel free to add to it / expand it. Thanks, BMRR ( talk) 19:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, You keep deleting my External Link on the Bald Head Island page as spam. You made the comment that the entire EL section on this page is spam. If so, then please delete the other links as well, as they are clearly spam. Please don't delete my link and leave the others. If you feel these links are spam, then please treat all of them as such. Thank you. Ben Celinski 67.142.175.25 ( talk) 00:49, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Could you please re-block Mangoman44444444 ( talk · contribs) as indef? This user is not a "newbie" as he could be our banned editor Brucejenner ( talk · contribs), you can see Kiss history and see the logs, he continues to try to remove our "homosexual propaganda". Thank you. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 05:17, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
BTW, welcome to the project! You've been making some great contributions, it's appreciated! Cheers, -- JaGa talk 04:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
copied from my talk page This situation has some issues to it; I'm discussing with the blocking admin. Please don't edit war over the tagging - it's not helping.--Kubigula (talk) 01:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Any update on BW? His suspected meat puppet has returned from the dead. Fountainviewkid 16:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Tatababy is currently blocked for edit warring and I suspect him/her of meating or socking. I agree with Fountainviewkid on this. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
So far there is no indication that BelloWello has modified his editing patterns since his unblock. He is continuing with exactly the same edits on Southern Adventist University that got Tatababy blocked for 3RR this week. Tatababy continues to tag-team with him. Was there any particular reason to think things would change? Mathsci ( talk) 17:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Since Mathsci does not want to discuss http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Mathsci&diff=next&oldid=430756505 this] on his talk page, perhaps someone could suggest a better venue to discuss this as he has made the claim about PUC multiple times? I am aware of similar controversies at Walla Walla University but I have not heard of anything at PUC, and I have no interest in Walla Walla. b W 23:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
The statement on that page is simply false. Please change the template, or whatever it is, to say "This username or account is no longer active on Wikipedia." Kenatipo speak! 02:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
When a user continues to be disruptive, I don't think it's very helpful for administrators to behave as if user names on wikipedia are real life identities that need some kind of protection. In particular, if these users are involved in disruption, it is unhelpful to conceal that. This redaction by Beeblebrox, which I only discovered accidently because of a checkuser request by Jasper Deng, was not helpful and does not seem to be part of wikipedia policy. [2] Were you aware of this edit? Mathsci ( talk) 04:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Note this revert [3] after your warning. Tatababy's account is a single purpose disruption-only account. Virtually the only edits this editor has made so far have been reverts identical to this, together with unjustified statements in edit summaries about "lies". They apparently took no notice of your warning. Indeed this was their response. [4] This account should probably be blocked indefinitely. Mathsci ( talk) 13:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
And Tatababy outed Fountainviewkid on his own talk page, BTW, which I had oversighted. The oversighter also fully protected Tatababy's talk page. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Kubigula, since Tatababy's talk page is protected shouldn't the text of the block notice change, since he or she can't "appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}"? Maybe list an alternate method, whatever that might be. Maybe I'm assuming more good faith than I should from this new editor, but as I said at the block notice, they were severely bitten and probably couldn't have chosen a worse place to make their first edit. Mojoworker ( talk) 07:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The link should refer to Palestinian people and not to the article about the region of Palestine. Please refrain from doing this change again. TheCuriousGnome ( talk) 23:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
My name is Ruben (userid - Armyanchik) and I wanted to check with you why my addition to the Penis Enlargement article has been turned off. We do manage a website that contains and will contain multiple articles, forum, and how to's.
Could you please reconsider your decision? I can modify the article further with research.
Thank you for understanding.
Ruben
Making my last attempt at getting GBL a wiki page here. The delete keep vote was 6-6, but those editors that were for delete in many cases said "no actual arcticles", or "no national media", Martha Stewart Living is national level media, and further there were THREE pieces, THREE, that were print media news stories in major newspapers. Before the wiki piece was desecrated by overzealous editors, it had 5 other sources, but they were on the gingebrread-lane.org webpage, so they were discounted as not viable. Which, makes no sense because at one point they ran in a major news paper. THis wiki piece is getting deleted because some wiki editors were overzealous in wanting to off it. This is my last attempt, but the simple fact is a couple wiki editors were pissed off at me because I paid somone to create the wiki pice, and they were mad as hell over that. Simple facts are that is not presently against wiki policy. And I further contacted someone at wiki to ask. I kindly request you please reconsider. I can tell you almost kept it. I really wish you would reconsider. It draws close to half a million visitors some years, if that isnt wiki worthy, what is? Kcdcchef ( talk) 04:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
CSD A1 was not applicable to this article (which has now been recreated by the original editor). It was quite obvious that the subject of the article was the regeneration of Salford Quays. The only speedy deletion criteria that I can think of that might apply to the article is A10. James500 ( talk) 17:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you reinstate this article?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/07/fashion/the-blogger-bebe-zeva-is-featured-in-a-video.html?_r=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palayla ( talk • contribs) 10:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed the Festival of Nations is celebrated in more than 1 city. The previous article with the topic "Festival of Nations" was specific to Minnesota. I added another article with the title, Festival of Nations (St. Louis) that is specific to St. Louis. I wanted to rename the "Festival of Nations" article to "Festival of Nations (Minnesota)" and create the links of both Festival of Nations (Minnesota) and Festival of Nations (St. Louis ) in the "Festival of Nations" page. Can I go ahead and move Festival of Nations to Festival of Nations (Minnesota)? and update the Festival of Nations page with these two links? Wiki magnet ( talk) 15:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you responded to my April 15, 2011 question regarding WikiProject Virginia assessment of the Hurricane Isabel article. If I understand your response correctly, that article should automatically be given an FA-class assessment because it was Wikipedia's "Featured Article" on the same day I added it to WikiProject Virginia. -- TommyBoy ( talk) 06:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I seen that you semi-protected the PWL article. Since this has a lot to do with confidential information, do you think we should contact an oversighter and see if any serious BLP vios should be WP:REVDEL'd? -- wL< speak· check>
for watching my back. Geoff Who, me? 01:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion about sourcing occurring and your opinion would be appreciated.-- Fountainviewkid ( talk) 03:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula! As you are well versed in the past turmoil at SAU, I was wondering if you had an opinion regarding the recent IP activity over there. – Lionel ( talk) 10:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Kubigula. My close of the AN3 report was all drafted and ready to go when you made your new offer, which would certainly be worth considering. If FVK returns to his computer to rethink the situation, it may be worth pursuing the discussion on his talk page. EdJohnston ( talk) 01:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
You seem to have a strange timestamp in your block notice on User talk:174.6.114.132. - David Biddulph ( talk) 12:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Could you set protection on this template as we have somebody making changes with no discustion on the talk page or explanation, Thanks. Simbagraphix ( talk) 09:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Here is the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Seventh-day_Adventism
Thanks Don for your assistance, I see the careful balanced way you proceed on the articles, and a good hand on the tiller always helps. Simbagraphix ( talk) 17:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Kubigula, just FYI, I would keep a eye on Wercvbnmghkjb (talk | contribs), seems as if BelloWello just cant keep from creating sock puppets. Simbagraphix ( talk) 17:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Mojo Hand/Archive 2011! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Regarding your question on the "point" of the conflict of interest portion of Tommy Norment's page.
This is an important piece of objective information about Mr. Norment. The request, opinion, and news release were all done by Republicans. All is factual, neutral, and I am wondering why it was taken down. In southeastern Virginia this is not new information. It just needs to be documented in a factual objective manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.0.89 ( talk) 14:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you're getting this message because you signed up to receive updates at WP:UWTEST, the task force on testing of user warnings and other notifications.
Here's what we're up to lately:
Thanks for your help and support, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 02:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello Kubigula, I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 21:35, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Kubigula,
Just giving you a heads-up about the latest update on our template testing. Please peruse when you have a minute. Thanks! Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 05:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate your cleaning up of my talk page and history from the vandal. 72Dino ( talk) 05:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Heyas, might I suggest an article that I created (shameless promotion) that might help with any "please stop deleting my page" and "why did you delete my page" posts you might have received. It's User:Neutralhomer/WWMAD. What I do is just post it as {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/WWMAD}}~~~~ and it creates the section header and signs it itself, just a copy/paste job. It might help so you won't have to constantly answer those posts. Just slap the template on their talk page. Feel free to tinker with the page at User:Neutralhomer/WWMAD, if you like. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you previously commented on the WikiProject Virginia assessment of the Old Dominion University article back in January, 2008, and wanted to let you know that I have recently proposed that the article might need re-assessment. -- TommyBoy ( talk) 05:28, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula,
We're currently busy designing some new tests, and we need your feedback/input!
We also have a proposal to test new "accepted," "declined," and "on-hold" templates at Articles for Creation (drafts here). The discussion isn't closed yet, so please weigh in if you're interested.
Thanks for your help! Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 01:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Mojo Hand, I hope you have a Merry Christmas and hope your day is full of the true spirit of the day. Plus, good food, good family and good times. :) Have a Great Day! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC) Spread the joy of Christmas by adding {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/MerryChristmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Because iPhone's generations have their own pages, then why not iPod touch's generations having their own pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jawadreventon ( talk • contribs) 00:38, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Karen_Pang
Hi. I'm just wondering why this page was deleted. The reason given in your post was A7, but the person in question is an Australian actress, who is a current presenter on the Australian version of Play School - is it possible to retrieve the page, or would it have to be started from scratch? I'm not well versed in the rules of Wikipedia, so I apologise if this isn't an appropriate question. Thanks. Bikeshopgirl ( talk) 23:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)bikeshopgirl
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You have a previous edit on this article or its discussion, so FYI: Talk:Independent Greens of Virginia#Material by editor "PonchoChet". Let's try to make the article better. - Colfer2 ( talk) 20:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 21:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Noticed you wanted to take the Constitution of Virginia to FA. I think it might need a tad bit of work first. Whadda say we work on it together? I am willing to do the footwork and do the massive editing and such. Whatcha say? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:57, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for catching my error in userfying this page. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
"Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Being Bobby Brown, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 03:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)"
I quote you. I'm sorry, I know you have no way of believing me, but I am not the contributor at this Brown page. Someone else has been utilizing this IP address. My IP address is in flux, maybe that is the issue. However I am sorry that such edits were made, as much as I am sorry for you that I am not the editor. As an example of "me", see my work at Claddagh ring. 75.21.107.151 ( talk) 08:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, see this is me now: 75.21.149.48 ( talk) 08:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Kubigula, you are kind, and I appreciate your help. I've been here a LOOONG time- it is best if I keep to my fluctuating IP address and nothing more. Believe me. You seem like a much better, superior worker here...how I wish my old attackers from the days of yore had been more like you. Civil and helpful. I'm sorry to ramble, I'll not take up more space again. 75.21.150.44 ( talk) 09:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- WikiManOne ( talk) 19:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Kubigula. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dancing with the Stars (U.S. Season 12), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Is a plausible, useful redirect or is not a redirect at all. Thank you. Ged UK 20:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
FYI, as a courtesy, because I won't be offering my opinion on anything again at WT:UTM. Kudpung ( talk) 04:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
He once deleted my comments to mock the fliest white guy on the Jamestown article, hope you laughed trust me it was the perect joke to the guy it was for. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
173.238.160.69 (
talk) 23:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and I know you to be broadly clueful, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.
If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).
I hope to hear from you soon.-- Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation ( talk) 17:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula, as I have mentioned at WT:UTM previously, I have been working on a draft in my userspace to try and amalgamate the various disparate WP:UTM pages. It was also suggested in discussions that this would be an opportunity to write a behavioral guideline concerning the design of user warning templates (and user talk namespace templates in general). As this work represents a large structural change to the project, I would like to invite you and other project members and trusted contributors to have some input. The work I have done so far can be seen at User:Pol430/Sandbox/User talk namespace, I would very much like to get other peoples ideas for expansion and improvement. Rather than engage in long, unwieldy discussions about what changes I should make, it would be easier if you were to make any changes you see fitting, directly into my sandbox. Please direct any related discussion to my main user talk page. You can take this message as my permission for you to edit the page User:Pol430/Sandbox/User talk namespace and any sub-pages thereof. If you are to busy or would rather not, don't worry. I won't be offended :) Pol430 talk to me 12:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
You've beat me to reverting vandalism twice tonight, and I think that all your hard work deserves a reward! Sophus Bie ( talk) 04:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC) |
Serak unblocked me because someone unblocked Haymaker. I'm working on the Planned Parenthood article and discussing it on the talk page atm, feel free to step in wherever. W M O 20:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
How can information from the Congressional record be POV? Just because the facts are cited via Will doesn't mean they're vitiated by POV. This is from Senate debate. If it's just a matter of citing it from a source other than Will, then so be it. If not, then explain further. Megarian1973, 17 February 2011 at 05:15.
Sorry it took me forever to reply, I am significantly cutting down in the time I put into wikipedia since it has become apparent that there are pov pushing admins who wield their admin powers to fight content battles. At this point, my main strategy to keep from supposedly edit warring is to edit any one article a maximum of once a day and work my ass of trying to get people to be reasonable on the talk page. Also, I'm going to try and see if I can improve some articles in other content areas as I did before getting caught up with all these pov pushers. W M O Please leave me a wb if you reply 07:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
W M O Please leave me a wb if you reply 05:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Please take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the "Online Mentor" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Why did you remove my name from the Independents listing for Presidential Candidates? Both sections I have been removed and more than once this happened. I want to know why?
This is a violation of Federal Election Laws. Every Candidate has the Right to be seen and heard. If other Candidates are listed, you have to allow me to post my info. The same law goes for all types of advertisements. Every Candidate is given equal opportunity to represent themselves to the public. It is against Federal Election Laws to prevent a Candidate to known to the public.
From the desk of Presidential Candidate
Andrew Francis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aceperce ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
I do apologize for posting this twice, I am new to using Wikipedia and not sure how to remove my posting without a title. I was afraid that it would get lost since it looks to much mixed with the above article.
Why did you remove my name from the Independents listing for Presidential Candidates? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012 I have been removed from Both sections that list Candidates for Presidents for 2012 and more than once this happened. I want to know why?
This is a violation of Federal Election Laws. Every Candidate has the Right to be seen and heard. If other Candidates are listed, you have to allow me to post my info. The same law goes for all types of advertisements. Every Candidate is given equal opportunity to represent themselves to the public. It is against Federal Election Laws to prevent a Candidate to be known to the public.
Thank you
From the desk of Presidential Candidate
Andrew Francis Aceperce ( talk) 17:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Hoax article recreated after your deletion (G1,G3). Time to SALT. Rms125a@hotmail.com ( talk) 23:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I thought you might like to know that
208.101.233.100 (
talk) is an editor that geolocates to the same place as the following IPs (and whose contributions closely resemble theirs as well):
208.101.233.129,
208.101.233.54,
208.101.233.253,
208.101.233.184,
208.101.233.254,
208.101.233.193,
208.101.233.227,
208.101.233.179,
208.101.233.42.
All these IP-editors have similar editing patterns of no edit summaries, no references and no known responses to any talkpage messages/notices/warnings/blocks. This editor (or editors) only edits certain glamourous movie-star articles including
Jayne Mansfield,
Marilyn Monroe,
Dorothy Dandridge along with associated articles such as
Trax Colton,
Too Hot to Handle,
Female Jungle,
Tamango &
The Murder Men (film).*Note: Some of the IPs above were mentioned as part of a blocked user's (Harlow1937)
SPI.
I thought that you probably hadn't realized some of the background on this group of IP-editor/s. There's also been a subsequent
temporary range-block. --
Shearonink (
talk) 04:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Plus Barracking the Obama was uttered. What do you know about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.44.109.225 ( talk) 04:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
How do I make good edits? I am not sure — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.28.49.253 ( talk • contribs)
I think it's time for revdeletes and a removal of talk page access for this user. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey, you just blocked Blorod, can we look at maybe revdeling his contributions? Thanks
Blorod (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
nuke contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
-
Happysailor
(Talk) 01:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on May 14, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 14, 2011. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 20:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Virginia is a U.S. state on the Atlantic Coast of the Southern United States. The state population is over eight million. Its geography and climate are shaped by the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Chesapeake Bay, which are home to much of its flora and fauna. The area's history begins with indigenous settlements and the founding of the Virginia Colony in May 1607 by the London Company as the first permanent New World English colony. Virginia was one of the Thirteen Colonies involved in the American Revolution. During the American Civil War, Virginia joined the Confederate States of America, which named Richmond its capital, and the state of West Virginia separated. The state government is home to the oldest legislature in the Americas, and is unique in how it prohibits its Governors from serving consecutive terms. Virginia's economy has many sectors: agriculture in places like the Shenandoah Valley, federal agencies in Northern Virginia, and military facilities in Hampton Roads. The growth of the media and technology sectors have made computer chips the leading export, with the industry based on the strength of Virginia's public schools and universities. ( more...)
:)
FYI, these users have repeatedly edit warred with each other in the past (see block log for both), and have not got along lately. I have also warned BelloWello about gaming the system per User talk:Kuru#Bello. This is an interesting dispute resolution thing that I want an admin to look at. Thanks. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments on my talk page. If you have a chance, do you mind looking over this article? I think its ready for mainspace but would like a few more eyes on it to confirm that before I move it. I also plan for a DYK hook out of it. BelloWello ( talk) 03:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I saw your recent comment on Vaoverland's page and wanted to let you know that I started a section for him on the Deceased Wikipedians page. I didn't know him very well; please feel free to add to it / expand it. Thanks, BMRR ( talk) 19:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, You keep deleting my External Link on the Bald Head Island page as spam. You made the comment that the entire EL section on this page is spam. If so, then please delete the other links as well, as they are clearly spam. Please don't delete my link and leave the others. If you feel these links are spam, then please treat all of them as such. Thank you. Ben Celinski 67.142.175.25 ( talk) 00:49, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Could you please re-block Mangoman44444444 ( talk · contribs) as indef? This user is not a "newbie" as he could be our banned editor Brucejenner ( talk · contribs), you can see Kiss history and see the logs, he continues to try to remove our "homosexual propaganda". Thank you. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 05:17, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
BTW, welcome to the project! You've been making some great contributions, it's appreciated! Cheers, -- JaGa talk 04:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
copied from my talk page This situation has some issues to it; I'm discussing with the blocking admin. Please don't edit war over the tagging - it's not helping.--Kubigula (talk) 01:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Any update on BW? His suspected meat puppet has returned from the dead. Fountainviewkid 16:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Tatababy is currently blocked for edit warring and I suspect him/her of meating or socking. I agree with Fountainviewkid on this. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
So far there is no indication that BelloWello has modified his editing patterns since his unblock. He is continuing with exactly the same edits on Southern Adventist University that got Tatababy blocked for 3RR this week. Tatababy continues to tag-team with him. Was there any particular reason to think things would change? Mathsci ( talk) 17:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Since Mathsci does not want to discuss http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Mathsci&diff=next&oldid=430756505 this] on his talk page, perhaps someone could suggest a better venue to discuss this as he has made the claim about PUC multiple times? I am aware of similar controversies at Walla Walla University but I have not heard of anything at PUC, and I have no interest in Walla Walla. b W 23:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
The statement on that page is simply false. Please change the template, or whatever it is, to say "This username or account is no longer active on Wikipedia." Kenatipo speak! 02:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
When a user continues to be disruptive, I don't think it's very helpful for administrators to behave as if user names on wikipedia are real life identities that need some kind of protection. In particular, if these users are involved in disruption, it is unhelpful to conceal that. This redaction by Beeblebrox, which I only discovered accidently because of a checkuser request by Jasper Deng, was not helpful and does not seem to be part of wikipedia policy. [2] Were you aware of this edit? Mathsci ( talk) 04:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Note this revert [3] after your warning. Tatababy's account is a single purpose disruption-only account. Virtually the only edits this editor has made so far have been reverts identical to this, together with unjustified statements in edit summaries about "lies". They apparently took no notice of your warning. Indeed this was their response. [4] This account should probably be blocked indefinitely. Mathsci ( talk) 13:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
And Tatababy outed Fountainviewkid on his own talk page, BTW, which I had oversighted. The oversighter also fully protected Tatababy's talk page. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Kubigula, since Tatababy's talk page is protected shouldn't the text of the block notice change, since he or she can't "appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}"? Maybe list an alternate method, whatever that might be. Maybe I'm assuming more good faith than I should from this new editor, but as I said at the block notice, they were severely bitten and probably couldn't have chosen a worse place to make their first edit. Mojoworker ( talk) 07:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The link should refer to Palestinian people and not to the article about the region of Palestine. Please refrain from doing this change again. TheCuriousGnome ( talk) 23:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
My name is Ruben (userid - Armyanchik) and I wanted to check with you why my addition to the Penis Enlargement article has been turned off. We do manage a website that contains and will contain multiple articles, forum, and how to's.
Could you please reconsider your decision? I can modify the article further with research.
Thank you for understanding.
Ruben
Making my last attempt at getting GBL a wiki page here. The delete keep vote was 6-6, but those editors that were for delete in many cases said "no actual arcticles", or "no national media", Martha Stewart Living is national level media, and further there were THREE pieces, THREE, that were print media news stories in major newspapers. Before the wiki piece was desecrated by overzealous editors, it had 5 other sources, but they were on the gingebrread-lane.org webpage, so they were discounted as not viable. Which, makes no sense because at one point they ran in a major news paper. THis wiki piece is getting deleted because some wiki editors were overzealous in wanting to off it. This is my last attempt, but the simple fact is a couple wiki editors were pissed off at me because I paid somone to create the wiki pice, and they were mad as hell over that. Simple facts are that is not presently against wiki policy. And I further contacted someone at wiki to ask. I kindly request you please reconsider. I can tell you almost kept it. I really wish you would reconsider. It draws close to half a million visitors some years, if that isnt wiki worthy, what is? Kcdcchef ( talk) 04:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
CSD A1 was not applicable to this article (which has now been recreated by the original editor). It was quite obvious that the subject of the article was the regeneration of Salford Quays. The only speedy deletion criteria that I can think of that might apply to the article is A10. James500 ( talk) 17:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you reinstate this article?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/07/fashion/the-blogger-bebe-zeva-is-featured-in-a-video.html?_r=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palayla ( talk • contribs) 10:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed the Festival of Nations is celebrated in more than 1 city. The previous article with the topic "Festival of Nations" was specific to Minnesota. I added another article with the title, Festival of Nations (St. Louis) that is specific to St. Louis. I wanted to rename the "Festival of Nations" article to "Festival of Nations (Minnesota)" and create the links of both Festival of Nations (Minnesota) and Festival of Nations (St. Louis ) in the "Festival of Nations" page. Can I go ahead and move Festival of Nations to Festival of Nations (Minnesota)? and update the Festival of Nations page with these two links? Wiki magnet ( talk) 15:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you responded to my April 15, 2011 question regarding WikiProject Virginia assessment of the Hurricane Isabel article. If I understand your response correctly, that article should automatically be given an FA-class assessment because it was Wikipedia's "Featured Article" on the same day I added it to WikiProject Virginia. -- TommyBoy ( talk) 06:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I seen that you semi-protected the PWL article. Since this has a lot to do with confidential information, do you think we should contact an oversighter and see if any serious BLP vios should be WP:REVDEL'd? -- wL< speak· check>
for watching my back. Geoff Who, me? 01:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion about sourcing occurring and your opinion would be appreciated.-- Fountainviewkid ( talk) 03:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula! As you are well versed in the past turmoil at SAU, I was wondering if you had an opinion regarding the recent IP activity over there. – Lionel ( talk) 10:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Kubigula. My close of the AN3 report was all drafted and ready to go when you made your new offer, which would certainly be worth considering. If FVK returns to his computer to rethink the situation, it may be worth pursuing the discussion on his talk page. EdJohnston ( talk) 01:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
You seem to have a strange timestamp in your block notice on User talk:174.6.114.132. - David Biddulph ( talk) 12:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Could you set protection on this template as we have somebody making changes with no discustion on the talk page or explanation, Thanks. Simbagraphix ( talk) 09:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Here is the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Seventh-day_Adventism
Thanks Don for your assistance, I see the careful balanced way you proceed on the articles, and a good hand on the tiller always helps. Simbagraphix ( talk) 17:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Kubigula, just FYI, I would keep a eye on Wercvbnmghkjb (talk | contribs), seems as if BelloWello just cant keep from creating sock puppets. Simbagraphix ( talk) 17:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Mojo Hand/Archive 2011! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Regarding your question on the "point" of the conflict of interest portion of Tommy Norment's page.
This is an important piece of objective information about Mr. Norment. The request, opinion, and news release were all done by Republicans. All is factual, neutral, and I am wondering why it was taken down. In southeastern Virginia this is not new information. It just needs to be documented in a factual objective manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.0.89 ( talk) 14:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you're getting this message because you signed up to receive updates at WP:UWTEST, the task force on testing of user warnings and other notifications.
Here's what we're up to lately:
Thanks for your help and support, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 02:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello Kubigula, I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 21:35, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Kubigula,
Just giving you a heads-up about the latest update on our template testing. Please peruse when you have a minute. Thanks! Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 05:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate your cleaning up of my talk page and history from the vandal. 72Dino ( talk) 05:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Heyas, might I suggest an article that I created (shameless promotion) that might help with any "please stop deleting my page" and "why did you delete my page" posts you might have received. It's User:Neutralhomer/WWMAD. What I do is just post it as {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/WWMAD}}~~~~ and it creates the section header and signs it itself, just a copy/paste job. It might help so you won't have to constantly answer those posts. Just slap the template on their talk page. Feel free to tinker with the page at User:Neutralhomer/WWMAD, if you like. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you previously commented on the WikiProject Virginia assessment of the Old Dominion University article back in January, 2008, and wanted to let you know that I have recently proposed that the article might need re-assessment. -- TommyBoy ( talk) 05:28, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula,
We're currently busy designing some new tests, and we need your feedback/input!
We also have a proposal to test new "accepted," "declined," and "on-hold" templates at Articles for Creation (drafts here). The discussion isn't closed yet, so please weigh in if you're interested.
Thanks for your help! Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 01:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Mojo Hand, I hope you have a Merry Christmas and hope your day is full of the true spirit of the day. Plus, good food, good family and good times. :) Have a Great Day! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC) Spread the joy of Christmas by adding {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/MerryChristmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Because iPhone's generations have their own pages, then why not iPod touch's generations having their own pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jawadreventon ( talk • contribs) 00:38, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Karen_Pang
Hi. I'm just wondering why this page was deleted. The reason given in your post was A7, but the person in question is an Australian actress, who is a current presenter on the Australian version of Play School - is it possible to retrieve the page, or would it have to be started from scratch? I'm not well versed in the rules of Wikipedia, so I apologise if this isn't an appropriate question. Thanks. Bikeshopgirl ( talk) 23:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)bikeshopgirl
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |