Hello, MiltenR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
List of oldest church buildings. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk) 16:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a
minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given
undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a
neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's
talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Slavs, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Tom |
Thomas.W
talk 22:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
History of architecture, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Velella
Velella Talk 23:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your message. It wasn't a disruptive editing, really, I just made a mistake I fixed completely, no mess left at all, the page is perfect, finally I just added 1 photo, that is all I have changed. I wanted to rearrange the order and the topics of the content, I think they are not well arranged, because Byzantine architecture is not a part of Antiquity but of Medieval architecture. Don't worry and wait till the editing is completed, I was in the process. No need of blocking me, I am very responsible editor, still a bit ignorant, but responsible.
- I saw your edits at Timeline of Romanian history. It would help very much if you would WP:CITE your WP:SOURCES, since in the past the article was place of much heat and little light. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 21:22, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Serbian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simeon of Bulgaria ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
I fixed it. ( MiltenR ( talk) 20:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC))
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
RGloucester — ☎ 20:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fault block, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horst ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Verifiability and unsourced material at Ethnic groups in Europe
Hi MiltenR,
I also want to extend my hearty Welcome to Wikipedia! to you. Wikipedia's Verifiability policy is one the most important policies regarding modifications and additions to articles at Wikipedia. I realize you're still a fairly new editor here, and I wanted to make sure you understood the importance of this policy in every edit you make.
Thank you for the series of eight edits you made at Ethnic groups in Europe dated June 13 and 14; I can see that you are attempting to improve the article. Unfortunately, I had to undo them. There were various reasons, each one explained in detail one by one, in the edit summary for each revert. The principal reason was failure to provide a reliable source for your changes. Wikipedia's Verifiability policy requires that all assertions in an article be verifiable, by reference to a reliable source. The best way to prove verifiability, is to add a citation to a reliable source; this will create a footnote at the bottom of the page, that anyone can use to verify the accuracy of your statement, should they choose to do so.
You have made various assertions about population figures at Ethnic groups in Europe. Maybe these figures are accurate; maybe they are old and outdated, but used to be accurate; maybe they are pure fantasy. Who knows? The way to establish accuracy, is to add a reference; see Help:Footnotes for how to do this.
When you do add a footnote citing a source, it's important that that source be "reliable"; see WP:Identifying reliable sources to see what Wikipedia means by that. In particular, you may not use another Wikipedia article as a source, as Wikipedia itself is not considered a reliable source. (For why this is, see WP:WINARS.)
The article you were editing, Ethnic groups in Europe, is in terrible shape with respect to its observance of the verifiability policy; there is a woeful lack of referencing, and I have tagged several sections as {{ unsourced}} or {{ refimprove}}. The poor state of referencing in that article may have given you the impression that it's okay to continue in the same vein, but that's not how it works; just because everybody is running the red light, doesn't mean it's okay for everybody else to do it, too. (In fact, massive parts of that article need to be referenced, and if they are not, I will start removing it.)
I know you already know how to do proper referencing, because I can see it at List of ecoregions in Bulgaria, and in a couple of the edits you made to Timeline of Romanian history, such as this edit and this one, so that's great. Unfortunately, you didn't include one for these edits ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) at the same article, and those edits are subject to removal. Would you please go back to the Timeline article, and add a citation to a reliable source for each of those? Adding a reference into the edit summary itself as you did here, is not sufficient; the revision history gets old and becomes hard to find, and the source is detached from the inline content it belongs to. Please follow the instructions for using footnotes at Help:Footnotes, keeping sources close to, and following, the material they verify.
Thanks again for your contributions to Wikipedia; I hope you'll enjoy editing here! Mathglot ( talk) 21:59, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
It’s all fixed. Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 22:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyrillic alphabets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
It’s fixed. MiltenR ( talk) 19:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southernmost glacial mass in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rise of nationalism in the Ottoman Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mountains of the Balkans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamenitsa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upper Thracian Plain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arda ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Karakoram, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Kautilya3 (
talk) 15:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
You have added a large number of links to the "See also" section of
History of Bulgaria. It seems that you may have misunderstood the way such sections are meant to be used in Wikipedia. The "See also" section is not meant as a general navigation tool, as you seem to think. Please read the guideline
WP:SEEALSO carefully, especially the section
WP:NOTSEEALSO, and please note that As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body.
--
T*U (
talk) 15:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. ( MiltenR ( talk) 22:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC))
 | Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thank you. ( MiltenR ( talk) 18:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC))
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Byzantine Empire, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
~Swarm~
{sting} 04:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Please stop adding the claim that the Byzantine Empire was "initially" called the Eastern Roman Empire. Not only are you adding unsourced content to a featured article, but the claim itself doesn't even make sense. ~Swarm~ {sting} 04:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to make very clear the fact that the real name of this Empire is nothing more and nothing less than “Eastern Roman Empire”, and not Byzantine Empire. Maybe you are right I couldn't make it. Byzantine Empire is a “fake” name invented in the 16th century by other European powers, also claimants of the Roman legacy. “ The first use of the term "Byzantine" to label the later years of the Roman Empire was in 1557, when the German historian Hieronymus Wolf published his work Corpus Historiæ Byzantinæ“. Relax. Best regards. ( MiltenR ( talk) 20:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC))
- Relax? That's a bit of a bizarre thing to say to a fellow editor. "Byzantine Empire" is, obviously, a modern, retroactive name, not the original or "real" name of the state. However, you're trying to claim that the "original" name is "Eastern Roman Empire", which is simply not true. Not according to modern sources, nor according to older sources, not according to contemporary sources. You appear to be asserting a false assumption, without the ability to substantiate it with reliable sources. ~Swarm~ {sting} 05:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
In addition to what Swarm (rightly) says, can I please ask you to start using more informative edit summaries. Just labelling all your edits "improvement" or "adding content" is really not helpful. Edit summaries should give your fellow editors a concrete idea of what you're actually changing, so please be a bit more specific. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi.
You removed the "dacian-born" adjective from emperor Galerius which I added.
Did you even read his Wikipedia page?
His father was Thracian and his mother was Dacian according to Lactantius, in "de Mortibus Persecutorum".
This section added by me to this Roman emperor even says the following:
"According to Lactantius, Galerius affirmed his Dacian identity and avowed himself the enemy of the Roman name once made emperor, even proposing that the empire should be called, not the Roman, but the Dacian Empire, much to the horror of the patricians and senators. He exhibited anti-Roman attitude as soon as he had attained the highest power, treating the Roman citizens with ruthless cruelty, like the conquerors treated the conquered, all in the name of the same treatment that the victorious Trajan had applied to the conquered Dacians, forefathers of Galerius, two centuries before.[38]"
He is the only Roman Emperor to have ever wanted to change the name of the Roman empire to the Dacian empire!!!
You really think this guy didn't identity as Dacian-born after a statement and attempt like that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.122.250.147 ( talk) 22:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of European ultra-prominent peaks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Classical Age states, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Old Bulgarian alphabet (disambiguation)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Old Bulgarian alphabet (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Signed, The4lines |||| ( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.) 23:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your
recent edits appear to be
intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally
unpopular way, are highly
disruptive and can lead to a
block or
ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through
dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medieval Bulgarian army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often give only the word "Improvement" as an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field in a more appropriate way. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks!
Rsk6400 (
talk) 08:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I will give my best. ( MiltenR ( talk) 12:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC))
Greetings,
It seems you have previously edited article
Black sea or some article which is linked/ connected to
Black sea article.
- Requesting your visit to Talk:Black Sea#Some article restructuring and overhaul
- Also please do have a look at Talk:Black Sea#Coastal cities, requesting help; and help expand Black Sea#Coastal and port cities on Black Sea coast and trade.
- And also requesting to visit Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları, an article is about Ottoman times female slavery with a special focus on the state of non-elite common women slavery in those times; and help expand the same if you find yourself interested in the topic.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 11:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you added in this edit of yours a rather dubious etymology of the name Demetrius. Would you please be so kind as to add the full citation, i.e., page of the book and the quote that supports your edit? Thank you! Macedonian ( talk) 17:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
No problem, of course. Thank you. Best regards. MiltenR ( talk) 18:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
I provided reliable relevant sources, but you are still deleting this probable Greco-Román etymology. Best regard. ( MiltenR ( talk) 19:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC))
- The sources you provided are, unfortunately, falsified. Macedonian ( talk) 17:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
You have recently made multiple edits to Observation deck. This has included edit summaries that have not explained the change except for 'Improvement'. This is something you have been asked about before and you have agreed to provide more detail in your edit summaries but you have not done so with these recent edits. You have also included sources that are not reliable according to WP:RS e.g. www.curlytales.com is NOT a reliable source. You have also incorrectly cited sources using the wrong formatting (external links) rather proper citation format as per WP:CITE. I was going to revert your edits but want to give you the chance to correct them as you have put work into this. Please correct these errors asap. If you don't know how to cite correctly or have other questions I am happy to answer anything if I can. Thanks. Robynthehode ( talk) 18:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I am trying my best. I don’t think reverting to a worse and less correct version is the best you can do also. Best regards. ( MiltenR ( talk) 18:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC))
I gave sources. I will try to improve it. ( MiltenR ( talk) 18:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC))
- A few things. When you reply you should indent with one more colon (:) than is already present. After my post above you have continued to add unreliable sources. www.heightpedia.com is not a reliable source. Giving sources is good but they must be from reliable sources. Read WP:RS. Reverting edits that add inaccurate information (that includes content and sources) is perfectly alright because adding inaccurate information just causes more work for those editors - like myself - who have read Wikipedia protocols and add content according to them. I can see you are trying but if you continue to add sources that are unreliable and completely irrelevant (the source you gave for the Jinping-I Dam entry mentions nothing about the observation deck just the dam. This article is about observation platforms/decks and sources should always clearly mention them) you will put me in the position of reverting your edits. I wll wait for you to correct your edits - correct citing formatting and adding references from reliable sources. If there is anything you don't understand or need answers to let me know. Robynthehode ( talk) 22:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bulgarian National Revival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hristo Georgiev.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
List of oldest continuously inhabited cities into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
RegentsPark (
comment) 19:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 19:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi MiltenR, I noticed that after the above message, you are continuing to copy content from pages including Sofia, Plovdiv, and Nesebar, into List of oldest continuously inhabited cities. In the future, please acknowledge the source of the copied content in the edit summary as detailed above, rather than a generic edit summary such as "Improvement". Thanks! DanCherek ( talk) 22:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plovdiv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Byzantines.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of cities founded by the Romans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archar.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi MiltenR, and thanks for the additions to the Hadrian article. However, you've added material without providing a source. Please provide one (or however many are required to cover the added content). The onus for provision of sources falls on the editor who adds material, and that's a fundamental requirement of all Wikipedia editing; please also note that this article has been promoted to "Good" status, partly on grounds that its content is well sourced, sound and verifiable. Thanks in advance. Haploidavey ( talk) 18:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
PS: I'm not convinced that what you've added should be added as a paragraph under that section heading; perhaps it would be better placed directly under the section heading, or under the relevant heading of the "Travels", but we can sort that out once the pargraph is sourced. Haploidavey ( talk) 19:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Alright MiltenR ( talk) 18:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottoman Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruse.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatian–Bulgarian wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
I have reverted some of your recent edits to World war because you are continuing to copy from other articles without providing the required attribution. This is a violation of the terms of Wikipedia's license. Please carefully review Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia instead of relying other editors to clean up after you. Thank you. DanCherek ( talk) 23:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, you are right. ( MiltenR ( talk) 23:39, 21 March 2022 (UTC))
- Please let me know if you have any questions about how to do it. Thanks and much appreciated! DanCherek ( talk) 23:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Archaeological Complex Durankulak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old Great Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrician.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of archaeological sites by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi MiltenR, and thanks for your contributions to List of predecessors of sovereign states in Europe and other articles. A recent rollback at this article inadvertently removed three good edits of yours from around 29 August, as part of a rollback that was required to remove a massive amount of unsourced material. I apologize for this, but wanted to let you know, so you could reinstate your edits which were an improvement to the article. Once, again, I apologize for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mathglot ( talk) 08:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 18:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- I noticed your recent well-sourced additions there; thanks for carrying this article forward on a sound basis. Happy editing! Mathglot ( talk) 01:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 15:45, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Civilization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to
Bulgars appears to be a
minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given
undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a
neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's
talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 22:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
I don’t see any problem there, relevant reliable sources are provided. MiltenR ( talk) 22:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 11:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am glad. Thank you. You should give reliable relevant sources to prove your pint of view and not reverting without real reason. MiltenR ( talk) 15:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Talk:Bulgars. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --
Kansas Bear (
talk) 17:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 19:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neo-Byzantine architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Yankul Hrelyovski moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Yankul Hrelyovski, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from
reliable,
independent sources to remain in the
mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article.
Silikonz
💬 16:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Jeppiz (
talk) 18:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Than you. MiltenR ( talk) 17:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Bulgarian Empire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulgarian Empire, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christianization of Moravia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian Empire.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ancient Macedonians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paeonia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demetrius of Thessaloniki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 23:12, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- You are involved also. The use of reliable and relevant sources and scientific studies is imprescindible. MiltenR ( talk) 06:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
EvergreenFir
(talk) 05:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. That’s why using references to reliable and relevant sources and scientific studies is imprescindible. MiltenR ( talk) 06:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 16:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. Reverting when reliable relevant information and sources are being removed. Talk pages don’t work that way with people claiming things without references.
MiltenR (
talk) 16:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. None of the sources you add are actually reliable. Talk pages work for disputes. If you want to restore disputed content, you have to discuss it on the talk page. You can't repeatedly restore content disputed by other editors. For example, this
source is not of any academic value and comes from a journalistic website, pushing the fringe POV that Bulgarians are unrelated to Slavs. This
source is a preprint and not peer-reviewed, thus it's not a reliable source (per (
WP:PREPRINT). So, what I'd suggest you is to refrain from reverting now and focus on the ANI case against you. You've reverted constructive edits by others too, such as those removing unsourced content and one who made a MOS edit. Please be more responsible.
StephenMacky1 (
talk) 17:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- The sources are reliable - Bulgarian National Radio, NIH
- (National Library of Medicine) -
- National Center for Blotechnology information in US, etc.
MiltenR (
talk) 21:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- I know what the sources are, it's the context that is important and I explained why they're unreliable. Not to mention that they contradict with other secondary reliable sources. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 22:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. None of the sources you add are actually reliable. Talk pages work for disputes. If you want to restore disputed content, you have to discuss it on the talk page. You can't repeatedly restore content disputed by other editors. For example, this
source is not of any academic value and comes from a journalistic website, pushing the fringe POV that Bulgarians are unrelated to Slavs. This
source is a preprint and not peer-reviewed, thus it's not a reliable source (per (
WP:PREPRINT). So, what I'd suggest you is to refrain from reverting now and focus on the ANI case against you. You've reverted constructive edits by others too, such as those removing unsourced content and one who made a MOS edit. Please be more responsible.
StephenMacky1 (
talk) 17:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MiltenR reported by User:StephenMacky1 (Result: ). Thank you.
StephenMacky1 (
talk) 21:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 22:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
MiltenR ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Adding recent scientific studies and data coming from reliable relevant sources is useful contribution. To delete unsourced irrelevant information is also useful contribution. This page Bulgars as many others are a target of some kind of attack from organised groups. Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 19:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked because of WP:EW but don't address this in your unblock request. Plus, come on. The block expires in two hours. It's not worth contesting the block at this point, it's unlikely another unblock request will be reviewed within two hours. Yamla ( talk) 20:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MiltenR ( talk) 19:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have no idea why you're appealing a two-week block two hours before it expires, and I see no point in granting the request.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 19:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Because the question is a matter of principle. Useful contributions should not be penalized. (
MiltenR (
talk) 20:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC))
- The applicable principle is described by the policy against edit-warring. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Because the question is a matter of principle. Useful contributions should not be penalized. (
MiltenR (
talk) 20:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC))
Thank you. ( MiltenR ( talk) 21:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC))
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 23:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- The page Bulgars is full of misleading and unsourced information. Correction are needed. Maintaining this wrong information in Wikipedia is destructive and tendentious and do nothing to improve Wikipedia. I am adding reliable relevant information and sources. MiltenR ( talk) 14:10, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Yankul Hrelyovski
Hello, MiltenR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Yankul Hrelyovski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 18:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Bulgarian language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banat dialect.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Yankul Hrelyovski
Hello, MiltenR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Yankul Hrelyovski".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding, removing or
changing genres without providing a
source or establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please do not insert
fringe or
undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's
talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 18:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to change
genres without discussion or sources, you may be
blocked from editing.
Jingiby (
talk) 03:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Jingiby, you may be blocked from editing too, if you continue your mission of maintaining the spread of misleading information in the article Bulgars. MiltenR ( talk) 06:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your
recent edits appear to be
intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally
unpopular way, are highly
disruptive and can lead to a
block or
ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through
dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 06:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby ( talk) 17:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 16:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Beahogur, your Turkic views regarding the ancient Bulgarians is going to be dismantled. This 20th century fake theory created by Russian, also German and Austrian imperialistic and totalitarian historians is doomed. MiltenR ( talk) 05:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
EvergreenFir
(talk) 18:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)- Note: This block is independent of the larger topic being discussed at ANI. You are blocked for continuing your edit war that resulted in a 2 week block back in May 2023. You are warring over the exact same content.
EvergreenFir
(talk) 18:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ EvergreenFir: he also abuses IPs to write on Talk:Bulgars, see proof [1] compare with [2]. Beshogur ( talk) 12:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Some of your recent
genre changes have conflicted with our
neutral point of view and/or
verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide
reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek
consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 06:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 23:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- I am always giving valuable relevant and reliable sources. MiltenR ( talk) 23:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding, removing or
changing genres without providing a
source or establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
EvergreenFir
(talk) 23:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)- The first Turkic states and people known with certainty are mentioned from the 6th century (552) onwards but in eastern Asia and the ancient Bulgarians are clearly mentioned in historical records from the 4th century onwards are least but in central and southeast Europe. No logic there, just propaganda, 19th and 20th century imperialistic and totalitarian German, Austrian, Russian and ultimately Western propaganda.
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Turkic_Khaganate MiltenR ( talk) 22:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Because you seem unable to contribute to Wikipedia in a collaborative and constructive manner, I wanted to indefinitely block you. But I opted for a 6-month block instead for edit warring. For any reviewing admins, the edit war was around the term khan as shown in these diffs: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- You should read this Wikipedia article and stop blocking users without any real reason:
- Kanasubigi MiltenR ( talk) 18:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- “The title khan for early Bulgarian rulers is an assumed one, as only the form kanasubigi or "kanasybigi" is attested in stone inscriptions.” MiltenR ( talk) 22:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- “Another presumption is that the title means the great khan.”
- Presumpsion!!! MiltenR ( talk) 22:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- We have science and all this misleading historical narrative is doomed:
- Paper concludes: “a shared paternal ancestry between proto-Bulgarians and Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking groups either did not exist or was negligible.”
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590186/ MiltenR ( talk) 22:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The first Turkic states and people known with certainty are mentioned from the 6th century (552) onwards but in eastern Asia and the ancient Bulgarians are clearly mentioned in historical records from the 4th century onwards are least but in central and southeast Europe. No logic there, just propaganda, 19th and 20th century imperialistic and totalitarian German, Austrian, Russian and ultimately Western propaganda.
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Turkic_Khaganate MiltenR ( talk) 22:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
MiltenR ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The title khan for early Bulgarian rulers is an assumed one, as only the form kanasubigi or "kanasybigi"[3] is attested in stone inscriptions.
Decline reason:
You are blocked for edit warring ( WP:EW). Of course you think you are correct, but this is not relevant. Yamla ( talk) 23:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
“The title khan for early Bulgarian rulers is an assumed one, as only the form kanasubigi or "kanasybigi"”
“The title khan for early Bulgarian rulers is an assumed one, as only the form kanasubigi or "kanasybigi"”
Using unproven presumptions is against Wikipedia main idea MiltenR ( talk) 23:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Spicy (
talk) 01:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Hello, MiltenR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
List of oldest church buildings. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk) 16:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a
minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given
undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a
neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's
talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Slavs, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Tom |
Thomas.W
talk 22:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
History of architecture, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Velella
Velella Talk 23:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your message. It wasn't a disruptive editing, really, I just made a mistake I fixed completely, no mess left at all, the page is perfect, finally I just added 1 photo, that is all I have changed. I wanted to rearrange the order and the topics of the content, I think they are not well arranged, because Byzantine architecture is not a part of Antiquity but of Medieval architecture. Don't worry and wait till the editing is completed, I was in the process. No need of blocking me, I am very responsible editor, still a bit ignorant, but responsible.
- I saw your edits at Timeline of Romanian history. It would help very much if you would WP:CITE your WP:SOURCES, since in the past the article was place of much heat and little light. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 21:22, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Serbian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simeon of Bulgaria ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
I fixed it. ( MiltenR ( talk) 20:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC))
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
RGloucester — ☎ 20:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fault block, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horst ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Verifiability and unsourced material at Ethnic groups in Europe
Hi MiltenR,
I also want to extend my hearty Welcome to Wikipedia! to you. Wikipedia's Verifiability policy is one the most important policies regarding modifications and additions to articles at Wikipedia. I realize you're still a fairly new editor here, and I wanted to make sure you understood the importance of this policy in every edit you make.
Thank you for the series of eight edits you made at Ethnic groups in Europe dated June 13 and 14; I can see that you are attempting to improve the article. Unfortunately, I had to undo them. There were various reasons, each one explained in detail one by one, in the edit summary for each revert. The principal reason was failure to provide a reliable source for your changes. Wikipedia's Verifiability policy requires that all assertions in an article be verifiable, by reference to a reliable source. The best way to prove verifiability, is to add a citation to a reliable source; this will create a footnote at the bottom of the page, that anyone can use to verify the accuracy of your statement, should they choose to do so.
You have made various assertions about population figures at Ethnic groups in Europe. Maybe these figures are accurate; maybe they are old and outdated, but used to be accurate; maybe they are pure fantasy. Who knows? The way to establish accuracy, is to add a reference; see Help:Footnotes for how to do this.
When you do add a footnote citing a source, it's important that that source be "reliable"; see WP:Identifying reliable sources to see what Wikipedia means by that. In particular, you may not use another Wikipedia article as a source, as Wikipedia itself is not considered a reliable source. (For why this is, see WP:WINARS.)
The article you were editing, Ethnic groups in Europe, is in terrible shape with respect to its observance of the verifiability policy; there is a woeful lack of referencing, and I have tagged several sections as {{ unsourced}} or {{ refimprove}}. The poor state of referencing in that article may have given you the impression that it's okay to continue in the same vein, but that's not how it works; just because everybody is running the red light, doesn't mean it's okay for everybody else to do it, too. (In fact, massive parts of that article need to be referenced, and if they are not, I will start removing it.)
I know you already know how to do proper referencing, because I can see it at List of ecoregions in Bulgaria, and in a couple of the edits you made to Timeline of Romanian history, such as this edit and this one, so that's great. Unfortunately, you didn't include one for these edits ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) at the same article, and those edits are subject to removal. Would you please go back to the Timeline article, and add a citation to a reliable source for each of those? Adding a reference into the edit summary itself as you did here, is not sufficient; the revision history gets old and becomes hard to find, and the source is detached from the inline content it belongs to. Please follow the instructions for using footnotes at Help:Footnotes, keeping sources close to, and following, the material they verify.
Thanks again for your contributions to Wikipedia; I hope you'll enjoy editing here! Mathglot ( talk) 21:59, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
It’s all fixed. Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 22:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyrillic alphabets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
It’s fixed. MiltenR ( talk) 19:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southernmost glacial mass in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rise of nationalism in the Ottoman Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mountains of the Balkans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamenitsa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upper Thracian Plain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arda ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Karakoram, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Kautilya3 (
talk) 15:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
You have added a large number of links to the "See also" section of
History of Bulgaria. It seems that you may have misunderstood the way such sections are meant to be used in Wikipedia. The "See also" section is not meant as a general navigation tool, as you seem to think. Please read the guideline
WP:SEEALSO carefully, especially the section
WP:NOTSEEALSO, and please note that As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body.
--
T*U (
talk) 15:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. ( MiltenR ( talk) 22:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC))
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thank you. ( MiltenR ( talk) 18:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC))
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Byzantine Empire, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
~Swarm~
{sting} 04:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Please stop adding the claim that the Byzantine Empire was "initially" called the Eastern Roman Empire. Not only are you adding unsourced content to a featured article, but the claim itself doesn't even make sense. ~Swarm~ {sting} 04:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to make very clear the fact that the real name of this Empire is nothing more and nothing less than “Eastern Roman Empire”, and not Byzantine Empire. Maybe you are right I couldn't make it. Byzantine Empire is a “fake” name invented in the 16th century by other European powers, also claimants of the Roman legacy. “ The first use of the term "Byzantine" to label the later years of the Roman Empire was in 1557, when the German historian Hieronymus Wolf published his work Corpus Historiæ Byzantinæ“. Relax. Best regards. ( MiltenR ( talk) 20:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC))
- Relax? That's a bit of a bizarre thing to say to a fellow editor. "Byzantine Empire" is, obviously, a modern, retroactive name, not the original or "real" name of the state. However, you're trying to claim that the "original" name is "Eastern Roman Empire", which is simply not true. Not according to modern sources, nor according to older sources, not according to contemporary sources. You appear to be asserting a false assumption, without the ability to substantiate it with reliable sources. ~Swarm~ {sting} 05:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
In addition to what Swarm (rightly) says, can I please ask you to start using more informative edit summaries. Just labelling all your edits "improvement" or "adding content" is really not helpful. Edit summaries should give your fellow editors a concrete idea of what you're actually changing, so please be a bit more specific. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi.
You removed the "dacian-born" adjective from emperor Galerius which I added.
Did you even read his Wikipedia page?
His father was Thracian and his mother was Dacian according to Lactantius, in "de Mortibus Persecutorum".
This section added by me to this Roman emperor even says the following:
"According to Lactantius, Galerius affirmed his Dacian identity and avowed himself the enemy of the Roman name once made emperor, even proposing that the empire should be called, not the Roman, but the Dacian Empire, much to the horror of the patricians and senators. He exhibited anti-Roman attitude as soon as he had attained the highest power, treating the Roman citizens with ruthless cruelty, like the conquerors treated the conquered, all in the name of the same treatment that the victorious Trajan had applied to the conquered Dacians, forefathers of Galerius, two centuries before.[38]"
He is the only Roman Emperor to have ever wanted to change the name of the Roman empire to the Dacian empire!!!
You really think this guy didn't identity as Dacian-born after a statement and attempt like that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.122.250.147 ( talk) 22:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of European ultra-prominent peaks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Classical Age states, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Old Bulgarian alphabet (disambiguation)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Old Bulgarian alphabet (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Signed, The4lines |||| ( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.) 23:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your
recent edits appear to be
intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally
unpopular way, are highly
disruptive and can lead to a
block or
ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through
dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medieval Bulgarian army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often give only the word "Improvement" as an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field in a more appropriate way. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks!
Rsk6400 (
talk) 08:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I will give my best. ( MiltenR ( talk) 12:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC))
Greetings,
It seems you have previously edited article
Black sea or some article which is linked/ connected to
Black sea article.
- Requesting your visit to Talk:Black Sea#Some article restructuring and overhaul
- Also please do have a look at Talk:Black Sea#Coastal cities, requesting help; and help expand Black Sea#Coastal and port cities on Black Sea coast and trade.
- And also requesting to visit Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları, an article is about Ottoman times female slavery with a special focus on the state of non-elite common women slavery in those times; and help expand the same if you find yourself interested in the topic.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 11:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you added in this edit of yours a rather dubious etymology of the name Demetrius. Would you please be so kind as to add the full citation, i.e., page of the book and the quote that supports your edit? Thank you! Macedonian ( talk) 17:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
No problem, of course. Thank you. Best regards. MiltenR ( talk) 18:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
I provided reliable relevant sources, but you are still deleting this probable Greco-Román etymology. Best regard. ( MiltenR ( talk) 19:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC))
- The sources you provided are, unfortunately, falsified. Macedonian ( talk) 17:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
You have recently made multiple edits to Observation deck. This has included edit summaries that have not explained the change except for 'Improvement'. This is something you have been asked about before and you have agreed to provide more detail in your edit summaries but you have not done so with these recent edits. You have also included sources that are not reliable according to WP:RS e.g. www.curlytales.com is NOT a reliable source. You have also incorrectly cited sources using the wrong formatting (external links) rather proper citation format as per WP:CITE. I was going to revert your edits but want to give you the chance to correct them as you have put work into this. Please correct these errors asap. If you don't know how to cite correctly or have other questions I am happy to answer anything if I can. Thanks. Robynthehode ( talk) 18:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I am trying my best. I don’t think reverting to a worse and less correct version is the best you can do also. Best regards. ( MiltenR ( talk) 18:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC))
I gave sources. I will try to improve it. ( MiltenR ( talk) 18:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC))
- A few things. When you reply you should indent with one more colon (:) than is already present. After my post above you have continued to add unreliable sources. www.heightpedia.com is not a reliable source. Giving sources is good but they must be from reliable sources. Read WP:RS. Reverting edits that add inaccurate information (that includes content and sources) is perfectly alright because adding inaccurate information just causes more work for those editors - like myself - who have read Wikipedia protocols and add content according to them. I can see you are trying but if you continue to add sources that are unreliable and completely irrelevant (the source you gave for the Jinping-I Dam entry mentions nothing about the observation deck just the dam. This article is about observation platforms/decks and sources should always clearly mention them) you will put me in the position of reverting your edits. I wll wait for you to correct your edits - correct citing formatting and adding references from reliable sources. If there is anything you don't understand or need answers to let me know. Robynthehode ( talk) 22:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bulgarian National Revival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hristo Georgiev.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
List of oldest continuously inhabited cities into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
RegentsPark (
comment) 19:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 19:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi MiltenR, I noticed that after the above message, you are continuing to copy content from pages including Sofia, Plovdiv, and Nesebar, into List of oldest continuously inhabited cities. In the future, please acknowledge the source of the copied content in the edit summary as detailed above, rather than a generic edit summary such as "Improvement". Thanks! DanCherek ( talk) 22:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plovdiv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Byzantines.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of cities founded by the Romans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archar.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi MiltenR, and thanks for the additions to the Hadrian article. However, you've added material without providing a source. Please provide one (or however many are required to cover the added content). The onus for provision of sources falls on the editor who adds material, and that's a fundamental requirement of all Wikipedia editing; please also note that this article has been promoted to "Good" status, partly on grounds that its content is well sourced, sound and verifiable. Thanks in advance. Haploidavey ( talk) 18:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
PS: I'm not convinced that what you've added should be added as a paragraph under that section heading; perhaps it would be better placed directly under the section heading, or under the relevant heading of the "Travels", but we can sort that out once the pargraph is sourced. Haploidavey ( talk) 19:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Alright MiltenR ( talk) 18:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottoman Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruse.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatian–Bulgarian wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
I have reverted some of your recent edits to World war because you are continuing to copy from other articles without providing the required attribution. This is a violation of the terms of Wikipedia's license. Please carefully review Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia instead of relying other editors to clean up after you. Thank you. DanCherek ( talk) 23:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, you are right. ( MiltenR ( talk) 23:39, 21 March 2022 (UTC))
- Please let me know if you have any questions about how to do it. Thanks and much appreciated! DanCherek ( talk) 23:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Archaeological Complex Durankulak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old Great Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrician.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of archaeological sites by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi MiltenR, and thanks for your contributions to List of predecessors of sovereign states in Europe and other articles. A recent rollback at this article inadvertently removed three good edits of yours from around 29 August, as part of a rollback that was required to remove a massive amount of unsourced material. I apologize for this, but wanted to let you know, so you could reinstate your edits which were an improvement to the article. Once, again, I apologize for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mathglot ( talk) 08:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 18:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- I noticed your recent well-sourced additions there; thanks for carrying this article forward on a sound basis. Happy editing! Mathglot ( talk) 01:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 15:45, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Civilization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to
Bulgars appears to be a
minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given
undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a
neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's
talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 22:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
I don’t see any problem there, relevant reliable sources are provided. MiltenR ( talk) 22:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 11:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am glad. Thank you. You should give reliable relevant sources to prove your pint of view and not reverting without real reason. MiltenR ( talk) 15:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Talk:Bulgars. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --
Kansas Bear (
talk) 17:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 19:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neo-Byzantine architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Yankul Hrelyovski moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Yankul Hrelyovski, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from
reliable,
independent sources to remain in the
mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article.
Silikonz
💬 16:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Jeppiz (
talk) 18:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Than you. MiltenR ( talk) 17:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Bulgarian Empire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulgarian Empire, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christianization of Moravia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian Empire.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ancient Macedonians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paeonia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demetrius of Thessaloniki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 23:12, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- You are involved also. The use of reliable and relevant sources and scientific studies is imprescindible. MiltenR ( talk) 06:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
EvergreenFir
(talk) 05:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. That’s why using references to reliable and relevant sources and scientific studies is imprescindible. MiltenR ( talk) 06:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 16:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. Reverting when reliable relevant information and sources are being removed. Talk pages don’t work that way with people claiming things without references.
MiltenR (
talk) 16:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. None of the sources you add are actually reliable. Talk pages work for disputes. If you want to restore disputed content, you have to discuss it on the talk page. You can't repeatedly restore content disputed by other editors. For example, this
source is not of any academic value and comes from a journalistic website, pushing the fringe POV that Bulgarians are unrelated to Slavs. This
source is a preprint and not peer-reviewed, thus it's not a reliable source (per (
WP:PREPRINT). So, what I'd suggest you is to refrain from reverting now and focus on the ANI case against you. You've reverted constructive edits by others too, such as those removing unsourced content and one who made a MOS edit. Please be more responsible.
StephenMacky1 (
talk) 17:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- The sources are reliable - Bulgarian National Radio, NIH
- (National Library of Medicine) -
- National Center for Blotechnology information in US, etc.
MiltenR (
talk) 21:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- I know what the sources are, it's the context that is important and I explained why they're unreliable. Not to mention that they contradict with other secondary reliable sources. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 22:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. None of the sources you add are actually reliable. Talk pages work for disputes. If you want to restore disputed content, you have to discuss it on the talk page. You can't repeatedly restore content disputed by other editors. For example, this
source is not of any academic value and comes from a journalistic website, pushing the fringe POV that Bulgarians are unrelated to Slavs. This
source is a preprint and not peer-reviewed, thus it's not a reliable source (per (
WP:PREPRINT). So, what I'd suggest you is to refrain from reverting now and focus on the ANI case against you. You've reverted constructive edits by others too, such as those removing unsourced content and one who made a MOS edit. Please be more responsible.
StephenMacky1 (
talk) 17:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MiltenR reported by User:StephenMacky1 (Result: ). Thank you.
StephenMacky1 (
talk) 21:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 22:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)MiltenR ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Adding recent scientific studies and data coming from reliable relevant sources is useful contribution. To delete unsourced irrelevant information is also useful contribution. This page Bulgars as many others are a target of some kind of attack from organised groups. Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 19:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked because of WP:EW but don't address this in your unblock request. Plus, come on. The block expires in two hours. It's not worth contesting the block at this point, it's unlikely another unblock request will be reviewed within two hours. Yamla ( talk) 20:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MiltenR ( talk) 19:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have no idea why you're appealing a two-week block two hours before it expires, and I see no point in granting the request.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 19:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Because the question is a matter of principle. Useful contributions should not be penalized. (
MiltenR (
talk) 20:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC))
- The applicable principle is described by the policy against edit-warring. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Because the question is a matter of principle. Useful contributions should not be penalized. (
MiltenR (
talk) 20:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC))
Thank you. ( MiltenR ( talk) 21:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC))
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 23:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- The page Bulgars is full of misleading and unsourced information. Correction are needed. Maintaining this wrong information in Wikipedia is destructive and tendentious and do nothing to improve Wikipedia. I am adding reliable relevant information and sources. MiltenR ( talk) 14:10, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Yankul Hrelyovski
Hello, MiltenR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Yankul Hrelyovski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 18:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Bulgarian language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banat dialect.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Yankul Hrelyovski
Hello, MiltenR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Yankul Hrelyovski".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding, removing or
changing genres without providing a
source or establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please do not insert
fringe or
undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's
talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 18:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to change
genres without discussion or sources, you may be
blocked from editing.
Jingiby (
talk) 03:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Jingiby, you may be blocked from editing too, if you continue your mission of maintaining the spread of misleading information in the article Bulgars. MiltenR ( talk) 06:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your
recent edits appear to be
intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally
unpopular way, are highly
disruptive and can lead to a
block or
ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through
dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 06:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby ( talk) 17:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Beshogur (
talk) 16:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Beahogur, your Turkic views regarding the ancient Bulgarians is going to be dismantled. This 20th century fake theory created by Russian, also German and Austrian imperialistic and totalitarian historians is doomed. MiltenR ( talk) 05:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
EvergreenFir
(talk) 18:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)- Note: This block is independent of the larger topic being discussed at ANI. You are blocked for continuing your edit war that resulted in a 2 week block back in May 2023. You are warring over the exact same content.
EvergreenFir
(talk) 18:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ EvergreenFir: he also abuses IPs to write on Talk:Bulgars, see proof [1] compare with [2]. Beshogur ( talk) 12:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Some of your recent
genre changes have conflicted with our
neutral point of view and/or
verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide
reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek
consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 06:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. MiltenR ( talk) 23:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- I am always giving valuable relevant and reliable sources. MiltenR ( talk) 23:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding, removing or
changing genres without providing a
source or establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk) 04:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
EvergreenFir
(talk) 23:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)- The first Turkic states and people known with certainty are mentioned from the 6th century (552) onwards but in eastern Asia and the ancient Bulgarians are clearly mentioned in historical records from the 4th century onwards are least but in central and southeast Europe. No logic there, just propaganda, 19th and 20th century imperialistic and totalitarian German, Austrian, Russian and ultimately Western propaganda.
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Turkic_Khaganate MiltenR ( talk) 22:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Because you seem unable to contribute to Wikipedia in a collaborative and constructive manner, I wanted to indefinitely block you. But I opted for a 6-month block instead for edit warring. For any reviewing admins, the edit war was around the term khan as shown in these diffs: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- You should read this Wikipedia article and stop blocking users without any real reason:
- Kanasubigi MiltenR ( talk) 18:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- “The title khan for early Bulgarian rulers is an assumed one, as only the form kanasubigi or "kanasybigi" is attested in stone inscriptions.” MiltenR ( talk) 22:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- “Another presumption is that the title means the great khan.”
- Presumpsion!!! MiltenR ( talk) 22:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- We have science and all this misleading historical narrative is doomed:
- Paper concludes: “a shared paternal ancestry between proto-Bulgarians and Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking groups either did not exist or was negligible.”
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590186/ MiltenR ( talk) 22:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The first Turkic states and people known with certainty are mentioned from the 6th century (552) onwards but in eastern Asia and the ancient Bulgarians are clearly mentioned in historical records from the 4th century onwards are least but in central and southeast Europe. No logic there, just propaganda, 19th and 20th century imperialistic and totalitarian German, Austrian, Russian and ultimately Western propaganda.
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Turkic_Khaganate MiltenR ( talk) 22:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
MiltenR ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The title khan for early Bulgarian rulers is an assumed one, as only the form kanasubigi or "kanasybigi"[3] is attested in stone inscriptions.
Decline reason:
You are blocked for edit warring ( WP:EW). Of course you think you are correct, but this is not relevant. Yamla ( talk) 23:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
“The title khan for early Bulgarian rulers is an assumed one, as only the form kanasubigi or "kanasybigi"”
“The title khan for early Bulgarian rulers is an assumed one, as only the form kanasubigi or "kanasybigi"”
Using unproven presumptions is against Wikipedia main idea MiltenR ( talk) 23:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Spicy (
talk) 01:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)