Hello, Lookinhotbra, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to
leave me a message or place "
" on this page and someone will drop by to help.
Howicus (
talk) 16:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Thank you.
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 18:41, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:48, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 05:28, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with , a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 13:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Lookinhotbra", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is offensive to women and sexual in nature. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 17:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 20:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swami Nithyananda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kundalini ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jackmcbarn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Swami Nithyananda, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 03:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
I have to agree with Jackmcbarn's observations. Your edits appear purely as an attempt at character assassination. Understand that all the controversies against Swami Nithyananda are only allegations. And that he is the Guru of more than 10 million people worldwide. And not only that, he is the head of the oldest apex body of Hinduism. So calling him self styled is sort of like calling the pope a self styled leader. Please don't keep reverting the changes people are making to the article without reason. WP:AVOIDEDITWAR Acnaren ( talk) 17:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
As i said in your talk page earlier, Nithyananda's page does not exclusively belong to you. If you feel that any information is out of hand, Then please discuss on talk page. Please do not blank sourced content. Thanks.
Jackmcbarn ( talk) 04:11, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to let you know that the link on your user page to your previous accounttakes you to User:Username; I was about to fix this, when I realized that the account name that you mention in your user page doesn't actually exist. Graham 87 15:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
You had asked a question quite a while back on how graphology was related to psychology. You said that psychology was a real science and dismissed graphology as a pseudo-science. I don't agree with this. Graphology is related to psychology because handwriting is behaviour and psychology is the study of behaviour. The Harvard professor Gordon Allport categorized handwriting along with other expressive behaviour such as body language, facial expressions etc in his book Studies in Expressive Movement. I know you'll tell me about Beyerstein's book but I strongly advise you to read the book "The Beyerstein Book: A Critical examination" by Marcel Matley, one of the best Questioned Document Examiners and also a graphologist. The article on graphology is outdated and needs to be revised. Please do look up the website of the International Graphological Colloquium for a list of peer-reviewed research studies in support of graphology, most in foreign languages: http://www.igc-grapho.net/research-in-graphology. Thanks for reading. 182.72.155.182 ( talk) 09:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Lookinhotbra, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to
leave me a message or place "
" on this page and someone will drop by to help.
Howicus (
talk) 16:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Thank you.
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 18:41, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:48, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 05:28, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with , a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 13:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Lookinhotbra", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is offensive to women and sexual in nature. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 17:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 20:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swami Nithyananda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kundalini ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jackmcbarn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Swami Nithyananda, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 03:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
I have to agree with Jackmcbarn's observations. Your edits appear purely as an attempt at character assassination. Understand that all the controversies against Swami Nithyananda are only allegations. And that he is the Guru of more than 10 million people worldwide. And not only that, he is the head of the oldest apex body of Hinduism. So calling him self styled is sort of like calling the pope a self styled leader. Please don't keep reverting the changes people are making to the article without reason. WP:AVOIDEDITWAR Acnaren ( talk) 17:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
As i said in your talk page earlier, Nithyananda's page does not exclusively belong to you. If you feel that any information is out of hand, Then please discuss on talk page. Please do not blank sourced content. Thanks.
Jackmcbarn ( talk) 04:11, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to let you know that the link on your user page to your previous accounttakes you to User:Username; I was about to fix this, when I realized that the account name that you mention in your user page doesn't actually exist. Graham 87 15:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
You had asked a question quite a while back on how graphology was related to psychology. You said that psychology was a real science and dismissed graphology as a pseudo-science. I don't agree with this. Graphology is related to psychology because handwriting is behaviour and psychology is the study of behaviour. The Harvard professor Gordon Allport categorized handwriting along with other expressive behaviour such as body language, facial expressions etc in his book Studies in Expressive Movement. I know you'll tell me about Beyerstein's book but I strongly advise you to read the book "The Beyerstein Book: A Critical examination" by Marcel Matley, one of the best Questioned Document Examiners and also a graphologist. The article on graphology is outdated and needs to be revised. Please do look up the website of the International Graphological Colloquium for a list of peer-reviewed research studies in support of graphology, most in foreign languages: http://www.igc-grapho.net/research-in-graphology. Thanks for reading. 182.72.155.182 ( talk) 09:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)