Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Alexbrn ( talk) 03:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Mr Alexbrn, I'd appreciate if you improved the content on top of my edits. I don't understand your POV accusation, I thought my edits were neutral. LizardMeat ( talk) 03:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Have you edited Wikipedia using any other accounts? Alexbrn ( talk) 03:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

That must be more than a decade ago. LizardMeat ( talk) 03:36, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

To allow WP:SCRUTINY, please name the account(s). Alexbrn ( talk) 03:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Well I do not think anybody can remember internet accounts from 10 years ago! LizardMeat ( talk) 03:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I certainly can, particularly if I'd edited certain topics (it's easy to look up then). Alexbrn ( talk) 03:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I briefly edited topics related to Buddhism, which is all I can remember. I don't see why this should matter anyway.

Because Alexbrn is a retired English language PhD who has no knowledge or training in science but will look to ban anybody on any grounds in order to prevent them from writing on any topic he and his anti science group of quasi skeptics of wikipedia consider fringe. You even got yourself an fringe theory notice on their board. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Carnivore_diet,_again 93.141.96.10 ( talk) 08:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

LizardMeat likely sock-puppet of Zalgo [1]. 93.141.96.10 is the banned user JustANameInUse [2]. He has had about 50 blocked IPs in the last 6 months usually calling users "vegan activists". This has been raised to an admin who blocked his IPs a few days ago [3]. I have reported his latest IP. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 10:46, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Psychologist Guy is a vegan advocate editing an article for a famous vegan quack Michael Greger https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Michael_Greger&diff=991010461&oldid=990995208 93.141.96.10 ( talk) 11:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

• Hang on, I thought I was meant to be biased against Greger! [4] There are so many glints coming from the tinfoil I feel quite dazzled and confused. Alexbrn ( talk) 11:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

You ahve a PhD in Enlish and still cant read. Are you a sockpuppet of Psychologist Guy? Interesting. 93.141.96.10 ( talk) 11:23, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

"ahve a PhD in Enlish" Alexbrn ( talk) 11:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Oh no, a typo! You are very condescending for an editor who styles himself as an authority on what is and is not science. Very professional. 93.141.96.10 ( talk) 11:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Editors have no authority over content; sources do. Alexbrn ( talk) 11:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Editors pick sources and picked sources paint a picture by themselves. 93.141.96.10 ( talk) 11:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

93.141.96.10. You need to give up on using these IPS you have been doing it for about a year now, it is not really going anywhere. If you enjoy the carnivore diet and you are doing well on it then good for you, but Wikipedia is not the place to promote it we have rules here. There are carnivore diet communities on Reddit that promote fringe material and pseudoscience and many blogs on the topic so you could do your activism there. I don't understand the countless IP edits calling users vegan activists. It is not productive and you are blocked every time. It's just a waste time. More and more editors are going to find your edits problematic and you are going to get yourself blocked easier because you are becoming a known vandal. So what you are doing is actually counter-productive. I think you should give it up. Go and put some steaks on or something. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 11:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I told you, I am not on the carnivore diet. But go on, gaslight some more. 93.141.96.10 ( talk) 11:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

On your account you admitted to eating it but you are now not on it because it is not sustainable after a few months and it makes people ill. Hopefully you are consuming a lot of plant matter and you will be a vegan activist shortly :) Psychologist Guy ( talk) 12:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Nope, go gaslight some more. 93.141.96.10 ( talk) 12:17, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn ( talk) 03:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zalgo. Thank you. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 10:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply