From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Leofstan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Quiddity 17:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Leofstan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Re. Correction on Denise Levertov page --

Thanks for the following:

"(Corrected factual error; Washington U holds only a 1-box collection; the papers are at Stanford.)"

I've been focused exclusively on developing the Bibliography, so haven't looked at or evaluated other listings, such as thhat to which you refer. What is more needed is defense of my efforts to add Tables of Contents to the individual titles under Primary Works. Someone before I hadded added two quite a while ago, and those were undisturbed. In no time after my efforts one of my additions was deleted. And after that, becaues of my mention of them, another of mine -- and the two existing -- were also deleted.

At this point I view the continuing objection/s to adding Tables of Contents as harassment, as they are increasingly made up of invented rationales.

Thanks again. JNagarya ( talkcontribs) 17:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Leofstan. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 15:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template). reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

Small Special Collections Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC) reply

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Schlesinger Library may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

External links

Hi, Leofstan. I'm excited to see you're still working on improving the Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library article! It's looking quite nice. I did want to clarify one thing, however. I see that you've been adding links to external webpages in the article's body text. If you look at WP:ELPOINTS, a section of the guideline on external links, you'll see it contains, "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article. Instead, include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article, and in the appropriate location within an infobox, if applicable." I've removed the links in the article body text. If you think they should be included in the external links section, feel free to re-add them there. Thanks again! GorillaWarfare (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Gorilla! I didn't realize--I'll add those links in at the end of the article. I'm on to my next article, by the way--this is totally addictive!! Leofstan ( talk) 14:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Great job on the Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library article so far! GorillaWarfare (talk) 13:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on File:William Faulkner's Typewriter at the University of Virginia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones   (Talk) 23:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello Leofstan, I just created this article using your AfC draft because I was working on starting one anyway and found your version via Google searching which was much better. Strangely it was on a Japanese site. [1] It seemed stalled after 3+ months and looked pretty good. Glad you made the information available until now it wasn't anywhere on the Internet. -- Green Cardamom ( talk) 07:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Given your material has been successfully combined into the main article, I have submitted your old draft copy for deletion. Rankersbo ( talk) 10:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Category:Special Collections

Category:Special Collections, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the article. Unfortunately, I had to remove the lyrics to the song since I am assuming they are under copyright. If you feel otherwise, please let me know. Thank you -- CutOffTies ( talk) 01:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

GLAM Boot Camp announced (June 14-16 in DC)

You have expressed interest in the GLAM-Wiki US Consortium, so you may be interested in attending the GLAM Boot Camp next month in Washington, DC. This is a training designed to help Wikipedians interested in guiding museums, libraries, and other cultural institutions in wiki engagement. Travel funding available for those in North America. Since the event is coming up soon, please be sure to add your name to the page if you are interested -- and please pass this announcement along. (You may want to share on Facebook or on Twitter.) Thanks for your interest! - MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Link for GLAM Boot Camp

My apologies - here is the link for the GLAM Boot Camp mentioned above: Wikipedia:GLAM/Boot Camp. - Pete ( talk) 04:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC) reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Leofstan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Leofstan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Moved page T. j. sellers to Thomas Sellers without leaving a redirect: Name capitalization and format

G'day, I've moved your article to conform with Wikipedia's WP:TITLE standards — IVORK Discuss 01:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

A page you started (Randolph Lewis White) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Randolph Lewis White, Leofstan!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I added the References section, default sort key, and categories for you.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! ( talk) 16:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

A page you started (Ferdinando Ongania) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ferdinando Ongania, Leofstan!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Interesting man!

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC) reply

A cup of coffee for you!

Great job establishing Joan Williams (author).

To make the article as stable as possible if you have any more sources of information about this person, such as a biography or obituary, then include it as a citation.

Beyond this a common next step is to match more content to citations. A citation after every sentence is common. When you used citations, did all the sentences in your paragraph come from the same source? This is only evident by repeating citations, which I could help with if you need assistance.

Another next step would be structured data. Check out d:Q55647989. Consider clicking "add statement". If you make this an "instance of human", then following that, further statement iterations prompt you for biodata like gender, birth date, occupation, etc. We can also connect this person to any other databases.

Try on your own, or if you like, let's give it a go in person. This is how the wiki is built! Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Jefferson School (Charlottesville, Virginia). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jefferson School City Center. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jefferson School City Center. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. John from Idegon ( talk) 01:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC) reply

August 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm Natureium. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jefferson School City Center without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Natureium ( talk) 01:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC) reply

A page you started (Vinegar Hill (Charlottesville, Virginia)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Vinegar Hill (Charlottesville, Virginia), Leofstan!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great work on the article, and it's a very interesting topic as well! The article could use some more links to other articles, as well as categories. Additionally, words that are not proper nouns shouldn't be capitalized within section headings - I've already fixed this for now, but just for future reference.

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 20:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Leofstan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Account creation

If anyone at the event reports difficulty creating an account then you can make one for them while logged into your account. Go to

You can do this if you have the permission which I just requested for you at

I expect you to get permission today and to have it through the event.

Good luck with the event at WP:UVA- I am around. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have temporarily enabled the flag on your account until 2018-12-02. Keep in mind these things:

  • The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
  • The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the " confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
  • The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
  • Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Leofstan,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Carole Frances Lung, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

@ Meatsgains: There will be citations in fifteen minutes--I was working on some when you submitted your deletion recommendation, and that caused an edit conflict that deleted all my work.


Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains( talk) 19:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Katherine McNamara (publisher and writer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Four Seas Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Four Seas Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Seas Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe ( talk) 10:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Katherine McNamara (publisher and writer), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Leofstan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Katherine McNamara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Women in Red

Hi there, Leofstan, and welcome to Women in Red. Your experience of the book trade should be useful to the project. I see you have already written a few biographies of women and hope there will be many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look at some of our essays, perhaps starting with the Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 06:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Women in Red October 2023

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Ipigott ( talk) 06:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Women in Red - November 2023

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red December 2023

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Women in Red January 2024

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red February 2024

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red March 2024

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red April 2024

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red May 2024

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Leofstan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Quiddity 17:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Leofstan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Re. Correction on Denise Levertov page --

Thanks for the following:

"(Corrected factual error; Washington U holds only a 1-box collection; the papers are at Stanford.)"

I've been focused exclusively on developing the Bibliography, so haven't looked at or evaluated other listings, such as thhat to which you refer. What is more needed is defense of my efforts to add Tables of Contents to the individual titles under Primary Works. Someone before I hadded added two quite a while ago, and those were undisturbed. In no time after my efforts one of my additions was deleted. And after that, becaues of my mention of them, another of mine -- and the two existing -- were also deleted.

At this point I view the continuing objection/s to adding Tables of Contents as harassment, as they are increasingly made up of invented rationales.

Thanks again. JNagarya ( talkcontribs) 17:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Leofstan. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 15:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template). reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

Small Special Collections Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC) reply

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Schlesinger Library may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

External links

Hi, Leofstan. I'm excited to see you're still working on improving the Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library article! It's looking quite nice. I did want to clarify one thing, however. I see that you've been adding links to external webpages in the article's body text. If you look at WP:ELPOINTS, a section of the guideline on external links, you'll see it contains, "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article. Instead, include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article, and in the appropriate location within an infobox, if applicable." I've removed the links in the article body text. If you think they should be included in the external links section, feel free to re-add them there. Thanks again! GorillaWarfare (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Gorilla! I didn't realize--I'll add those links in at the end of the article. I'm on to my next article, by the way--this is totally addictive!! Leofstan ( talk) 14:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Great job on the Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library article so far! GorillaWarfare (talk) 13:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on File:William Faulkner's Typewriter at the University of Virginia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones   (Talk) 23:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello Leofstan, I just created this article using your AfC draft because I was working on starting one anyway and found your version via Google searching which was much better. Strangely it was on a Japanese site. [1] It seemed stalled after 3+ months and looked pretty good. Glad you made the information available until now it wasn't anywhere on the Internet. -- Green Cardamom ( talk) 07:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Given your material has been successfully combined into the main article, I have submitted your old draft copy for deletion. Rankersbo ( talk) 10:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Category:Special Collections

Category:Special Collections, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the article. Unfortunately, I had to remove the lyrics to the song since I am assuming they are under copyright. If you feel otherwise, please let me know. Thank you -- CutOffTies ( talk) 01:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

GLAM Boot Camp announced (June 14-16 in DC)

You have expressed interest in the GLAM-Wiki US Consortium, so you may be interested in attending the GLAM Boot Camp next month in Washington, DC. This is a training designed to help Wikipedians interested in guiding museums, libraries, and other cultural institutions in wiki engagement. Travel funding available for those in North America. Since the event is coming up soon, please be sure to add your name to the page if you are interested -- and please pass this announcement along. (You may want to share on Facebook or on Twitter.) Thanks for your interest! - MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Link for GLAM Boot Camp

My apologies - here is the link for the GLAM Boot Camp mentioned above: Wikipedia:GLAM/Boot Camp. - Pete ( talk) 04:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC) reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Leofstan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Leofstan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Moved page T. j. sellers to Thomas Sellers without leaving a redirect: Name capitalization and format

G'day, I've moved your article to conform with Wikipedia's WP:TITLE standards — IVORK Discuss 01:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

A page you started (Randolph Lewis White) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Randolph Lewis White, Leofstan!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I added the References section, default sort key, and categories for you.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! ( talk) 16:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

A page you started (Ferdinando Ongania) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ferdinando Ongania, Leofstan!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Interesting man!

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC) reply

A cup of coffee for you!

Great job establishing Joan Williams (author).

To make the article as stable as possible if you have any more sources of information about this person, such as a biography or obituary, then include it as a citation.

Beyond this a common next step is to match more content to citations. A citation after every sentence is common. When you used citations, did all the sentences in your paragraph come from the same source? This is only evident by repeating citations, which I could help with if you need assistance.

Another next step would be structured data. Check out d:Q55647989. Consider clicking "add statement". If you make this an "instance of human", then following that, further statement iterations prompt you for biodata like gender, birth date, occupation, etc. We can also connect this person to any other databases.

Try on your own, or if you like, let's give it a go in person. This is how the wiki is built! Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Jefferson School (Charlottesville, Virginia). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jefferson School City Center. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jefferson School City Center. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. John from Idegon ( talk) 01:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC) reply

August 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm Natureium. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jefferson School City Center without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Natureium ( talk) 01:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC) reply

A page you started (Vinegar Hill (Charlottesville, Virginia)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Vinegar Hill (Charlottesville, Virginia), Leofstan!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great work on the article, and it's a very interesting topic as well! The article could use some more links to other articles, as well as categories. Additionally, words that are not proper nouns shouldn't be capitalized within section headings - I've already fixed this for now, but just for future reference.

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 20:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Leofstan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Account creation

If anyone at the event reports difficulty creating an account then you can make one for them while logged into your account. Go to

You can do this if you have the permission which I just requested for you at

I expect you to get permission today and to have it through the event.

Good luck with the event at WP:UVA- I am around. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have temporarily enabled the flag on your account until 2018-12-02. Keep in mind these things:

  • The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
  • The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the " confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
  • The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
  • Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Leofstan,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Carole Frances Lung, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

@ Meatsgains: There will be citations in fifteen minutes--I was working on some when you submitted your deletion recommendation, and that caused an edit conflict that deleted all my work.


Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains( talk) 19:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Katherine McNamara (publisher and writer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Four Seas Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Four Seas Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Seas Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe ( talk) 10:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Katherine McNamara (publisher and writer), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Leofstan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Katherine McNamara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Women in Red

Hi there, Leofstan, and welcome to Women in Red. Your experience of the book trade should be useful to the project. I see you have already written a few biographies of women and hope there will be many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look at some of our essays, perhaps starting with the Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 06:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Women in Red October 2023

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Ipigott ( talk) 06:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Women in Red - November 2023

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red December 2023

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Women in Red January 2024

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red February 2024

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red March 2024

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red April 2024

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply

Women in Red May 2024

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook