This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Laterthanyouthink,
Thanks for your help and advice on the Stuffed toy article. I wasn’t sure what sort of reception I would get, especially because there weren’t any super active editors on the article, so it was nice to interact with a more experienced editor. Your tips on wikilinks and on checking the images in the mobile version were particularly helpful, and I applied them to another article I was working on as well. Thanks for the positive experience! -- Lhill21 ( talk) 21:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice on this disambiguation thing, laterthanyouthink, and thanks for reading my articles. I might end up doing Lawn Hill but there's so much other damn interesting Australian and Pacific colonial history out there that needs to go on Wikipedia so I don't know when I'll get around to it! Let me know if there's any other topics you think I could add to. Cheers. Dippiljemmy ( talk) 01:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, Dippiljemmy, that's great. I'll get back to that one one day too. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 11:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thank you very much for your help. We have finished our page on Wikipedia, can you give some suggestions in order to make it approved, Draft: Rocca di Manerba del Garda. Thank you in advance. Milan20MA ( talk) 08:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink, you may be interested in the Kaurna cultural resources on the City of Charles Sturt website, and this link in particular - Yerta Bulti (Port River and Estuary region). Cheers, Bahudhara ( talk) 07:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I notice you linked, back in May, to a website full of pirated material to add a direct link for someone to download someone else's copyrighted materials illegally with this edit. Note I've removed the edit so it can no longer be viewed. As you're no doubt aware by now, having had several conversations with others, you cannot add copyrighted material, or links to copyright violations, on Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 17:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Laterthanyouthink,
Thank you for creating Council for Aboriginal Rights.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Hi - thanks for creating this, it's a very interesting and notable organisation. My main comment is that the piece is under-referenced, for example the entire section titled "Foundation" contains only one reference.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Goldsztajn ( talk) 09:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Goldsztajn after a long and roundabout side-track onto anti-slavery societies and other organisations and related articles, I returned to this one to add a couple of those extra citations as Further reading, because I really cannot do any more on it now, with so many other things to attend to (and even some real life in between). But to follow up with the JSTOR limitations - it seems to behave peculiarly with me. I have now found that "view XX search matches" text you mentioned, which only shows if I click straight onto the link after searching, and not if I right click to open in a new tab (as I usually do), BUT, only shows for some articles and not others! (The Pilbara one works, but none of the others that came up on my search list.) And I couldn't find anything relevant in the Pearl Gibbs article. Anyhoo... As I said, I'm done with that one for now, but that search trick on JSTOR will come in handy when it works for me in the future! Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 03:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For ensuring that I did not add an incorrectly identified image into a Wikipedia article and for so gently pointing out my error! Shyamal ( talk) 05:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Laterthanyouthink
Thank you for creating Birmingham Ladies Society for the Relief of Negro Slaves.
User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Celestina007 ( talk) 07:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink, I am one of the creator of this Wikipedia page Draft:Cinque Vette Park, Lombardy, I would like to ask you if you could give a look at it. We submitted it on the 29th of November but it has not been accepted yet. My team and I would really appreciate that. Thank you in advance. Bighope71 ( talk) 15:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Ok, I understand you have other things to attend to. Thank you for taking a glimpse anyway. Bighope71 ( talk) 10:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your recent contributions to Coon cheese . I have edited a small portion of these. They were to remove talk in the article about citations and to remove excess information about the new name of the cheese.
If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page or open discussion on the article's. Thank you.
AussieWikiDan ( talk) 14:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to finish filling in the templates I added to the top of the page. See Template:Infobox ship for documentation on this group of templates. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 16:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm a very occasional intervener in wiki editing, and am not even sure if this will get to you, but I wanted to let you know of a couple additions to entry on Christopher Pearson, all based on my own personal knowledge of him from university days in Adelaide. Your edit history on this entry suggests you have sliced quite a lot from earlier content, shortening the profile considerably. For me, what's been removed looks interesting enough to have earned its place... but as I say, I'm an amateur here. Best wishes! Johanssenfs ( talk) 23:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your thoufhtful and detailed reply. I have been looking for conformation of TA's role as pall bearer at CP's funeral but so far no records. As I recall the date of the funeral was during a tough time for TA, though whether as lead up to an election or something else I am not sure. It was especially memorable for this, the event bring held some distance from Adelaide on the Fleurieu Pdninsula where CP owned a modest country retreat. I'm travelling to Adekiade in a couple months and I'll stay on the case to find evidence. Cheers. Johanssenfs ( talk) 20:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Laterthankyouthink, i've written an article on Vincent for the German wikipedia. I also have contacted "The Monthly" and got the article you just inserted into the article and thus could give the info in my text. If you want to read my article - which by the way was featured this month at the startpage of the German wikipedia in the section "did you know?" and had 9400 clicks - you could use google-translator. Just add the url into the left window - then choose "German to English" and click enter - then at the right window it'll give the url for the translated text. I have written differently than the english article, also named the exhibitions and gave reference-links etc. - perhaps we could add some of it into the english article? I'm not quite sure whether this is a strange question in your ears? Here is the link to the German article: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Namatjira , Kind regards, -- Gyanda ( talk) 12:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed - and appreciate - you creating redirects such as UNSW Canberra at ADFA. However, I'd appreciate it if you used {{ redirect category shell}} to wrap the redirect categories, even when there is only a single category. This allows for potential automatic categorization (though none would currently apply to the redirects you've made), as well as consistency in looks between different redirect pages. Thanks! Elli ( talk | contribs) 05:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
{{
rcat shell}}
to be a useful shortcut)
Elli (
talk |
contribs) 06:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Not so much unwilling to be drawn into as carefully watching & considering how I might assist in moving the matter forward - & I don't have an answer to that as yet. -- Find bruce ( talk) 06:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I have made a redirect from Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources to its predecessor Department of Industry, Innovation and Science. I don't write government department articles, but noticed you added the paragraph about the new name, some months after an IP changed the title on the infobox to the new name. My solution is not satisfactory either, but I'm not sure what the "right" fix is from here. -- Scott Davis Talk 10:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I don't see why we have to state the total when the percentage is already included, and why Islam is broken down by nationality. The only reason I can think of is to make a political point. "See how many there are? Of course they deserve a mosque". Am I wrong? Not that I disagree, but it's irrelevant. All that's required here is a simple percentage. All demographics sections use percentage rather than total. - HappyWaldo ( talk) 02:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
For your recent work improving Far-right politics in Australia. Cheers mate! Bacon drum 23:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC) |
hi, just on the side, I had a look at Dianekmt talk page, no discussions at the time she added her article to the then empty Kabi page, which might have been redirected already at the time. Its also for me difficult to distinguish who has more right to do things on here and who not, who is independent but doesn't explain, and who is violating. You know each other and also see, we don't. So with that status Dianekmt is deeply hurt and contacted Alex Lum Vice President - Wikimedia Australia who gave her the advise and explained how to delete the redirect and reestablish the page. I received that email from her and acted on it. Wikigetsme123 ( talk) 08:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
An Original Barnstar | ||
This Barnstar awarded in recognition of the dedication, effort and scrupulous attention you have devoted to articles dealing with Australian aborigines. Nishidani ( talk) 10:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
Palm Island, Queensland, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Whiteguru ( talk) 08:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. As far as I can tell an article title is mostly a way to navigate to a particular article. I care about the content of articles and verification, but article titles are generally low down my interests. As Australian law, Australian laws, Law of Australia, Laws of Australia, Australian legal system and Legal system of Australia all point to the same article, I don't much care which is the final resting place. There are exceptions, particularly where its the name of a person or concerns the conduct of a person. Sorry I can't be of more help -- Find bruce ( talk) 04:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you are right. I misinterpreted some parts of the study after looking at it again. I will revert my edits. I also found that more recent studies found contradicting evidence (such as Boer et al. 2020). I am sorry. Could you please accepted the reverted version in Negrito. Thank you for understanding. Have a nice day. 213.162.73.136 ( talk) 08:28, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Mz7 ( talk) 23:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Last year you added an "update needed" banner to the section "Business career" of Samuel Vestey, 3rd Baron Vestey. I note you and others have done multiple edits to the article since (including around his death). Is the banner still needed and what else do you think still needs updating?— Rod talk 15:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Do you have a source saying Flagey Building? Like Empire State Building. Flagey (building)? - Why not just keep as it was? You'd probably mot translate you name when going to a different country. - I have no time to check, - if you have a source fine. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
I'll be coming back to it tomorrow, and will ensure that it's widely used (per WP:ENGLISH). Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 09:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Terrorism Research Initiative, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me 16:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The "1865?" ship you have listed at the list of ships named Lalla Rookh appears to have been built in 1864. What do you think? Mjroots ( talk) 07:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the update [1]. However, the German wikipedia already had (English) references about its rediscovery in 2020. The article still mentions its extinct status in the categories. Also in [2]. Shouldn't they be updated as well? -- VanBuren ( talk) 10:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.nma.gov.au/exhibitions/yalangbara/yalangbara-region, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
It's an interesting case and you have summarised it well. It didn't decide any great legal principle - the copying was pretty blatant : I assume you have seen the images & carpet at page 13 of Janke. Instead it's importance was a practical one of enforcing the copyright of individual first nations artists. I have tidied up a couple of references in accordance with the Australian Legal Style Guide, but that's a minor issue. You could certainly justify a stand alone article, the approach taken in relation to Australian case articles is the title would be Milpurrurru v Indofurn Pty Ltd and the layout would be something like Wotton v Queensland (No 5). Have you looked at the T-Shirts case yet? (Bulun Bulun v R & T Textiles Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1082) highlighted a shortcoming of the application of copyright law as it applies to the individual artist and not to the Ganalbingu people whose stories were reproduced in the work. -- Find bruce ( talk) 06:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
What's all this about? -- Pete ( talk) 02:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Why have you added two additional subfamilies and used Pitts,, Wasbauer & Von Dohlen 2005 as the citation? From the abstract they confirmed that there were four subfamilies
“Notocyphinae sensu Shimizu (1994) was nested within Pompilinae and that Epipompilinae sensu Shimizu (1994) was nested within Ctenocerinae”
“strict consensus tree gave the following relationships: (Ceropalinae + (Pepsinae + (Ctenocerinae + Pompilinae))).”
Quetzal1964 ( talk) 13:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink, I'm a bit baffled by your addition to Surprise. Did you mean "includes HMS Surprize"? Leschnei ( talk) 22:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I restored my edits on Draft:4A Centre for Contemporary Asian Art which you had reverted, since they help. I am not sure if you know this, but it is notoriously difficult to get an article on a gallery published, since the reviews of shows held there count as coverage on the artists and not on the gallery itself. From the looks of it, this article has a similar notability problem as most sourcing is primary. I will poke around and see if I can find some sources. --- Possibly ☎ 01:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Possibly: It turned out to be my internet connectivity problem. I've been adding to the article over the past couple of days and just resubmitted it, intending to do a last proof-read tomorrow. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 10:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Dear Laterthanyouthink,
I see you reverted my additions to the Kuku Yalanjis in name of a neutral point of view. If we accept your understanding and use of this position as unilaterally and tacitly formulated by you then, comparatively speaking, for instance, - we should not speak about any history of the Germans and Germany before the Australians contacted them in the 20th c - we ought to limit any history of the Germans to that of their contacts with Australians - we would need to limit any discussion of German langauge and culture to Australian scholars' monographs on these subjects - we would need to deny and disregard the existence of Chinese culture and language prior to the founding of the PRC in 1949 - we should see the ethnic cleansing of Turks/Muslims from Greece and Bulgaria as 'removals' - while the wartime genocide of Jews we should present as 'mass murders.'
Hence, this kind of neutral point of view is nothing other than: - denial of genocide and ethnic cleansing - denial of any pre-invasion history to the Kuku Yalanjis - approval of forced assimilation - approval of depriving the Kuku Yalanjis of agency.
Such attitudes in writing about an ethnic group/nation are indicative of racism and (cultural) imperialism. If in doubt of what I am proposing, try to apply this supposedly 'neutral point of view' to writing about history, languages and cultures of European nations and states. And then see what other Wikipedians may think.
I am not going to engage in any eitorial sparring enjoy this specific kind of self-serving western 'neutrality' that justified cocnentration camp-like compulsory boarding schools for 'natives' children,' snatched from their parents to 'civilize' into 'white fellas.' Hyrdlak ( talk) 10:18, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Hyrdlak
Hello, Laterthanyouthink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Terrorism Research Initiative, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Laterthanyouthink
Thank you for creating Wide Open Space (festival).
User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work on the references. I had a great time reading them!!!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Whiteguru ( talk) 07:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to Aboriginal Centre for the Performing Arts has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 14:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
On 1 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article David Gulpilil, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 11:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed that you have made a few edits on the 'Australian Aboriginal Progress Association' article and was wondering if you could help me out. After doing some research I noticed that the title of the organisation is actually 'Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association', rather than 'progress'. Could you confirm or deny this by any chance? As the sources I have found have led me to believe the title of the article is wrong but just thought I'd check with another user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwal6418 ( talk • contribs) 11:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Great! Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwal6418 ( talk • contribs) 09:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Hey Laterthanyouthink, thanks for creating these new national park articles :) I'm just in the process of trying to update these on Wikipedia's sister site Wikivoyage, and so your updates on Wikipedia really helps. SHB2000 ( talk) 04:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Oh yes SHB2000 - thanks again - I had discovered them and have the tabs open, planning to come back to them! With these fiddly bits taking so long, I'm not confident I'm going to finish today, having some real life to attend to as well... Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 06:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Hey Laterthanyouthink, I'm trying to locate an image I could use for the Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association article. I'm having trouble finding images not restricted by copyright. I've tried flickr and the like, but I was wondering if you could point me in the right direction? Thank you! Bwal6418 ( talk) 11:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Bwal6418
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ningla A-Na and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Ningla A-Na until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 08:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to disagree with your reversion of my edit on Hillsong Church UK. At the time of Clarke's comments (Sunday, May 31), enough investigations into Floyd's murder had been completed for Chauvin to have been arrested and charged (on Thursday, May 29) with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. When the prosecutor charged Chauvin, and when the jury later convicted him, they did not say "this otherwise benign death from May 2020 has now retroactively been transmuted into a murder". Rather, their ruling recognized and affirmed that Floyd's murder was indeed a murder at the time when it happened. This may seem like splitting epistomological hairs, but I feel the distinction is important. I don't think it makes sense either to emphasize "the death for which Chauvin would later be convicted of murder": all convicted murderers have a delay between when they commit the murder and when the jury convicts them. It would require excessive linguistic gymnastics such as "refusing to comment on the murder of George Floyd, for which Chauvin had already been charged but not yet convicted" or "refusing to comment on the death of George Floyd that a jury would later rule to be murder". This additional phrasing might add some temporal precision, but only at the expense of clarity: the focus is taken away from Clarke's unwillingness to comment on Floyd's murder.
And for what it's worth, the wikilink was pointed to murder of George Floyd; when you reverted it, it pointed to "death of George Floyd", which is a redirect to "murder of George Floyd". I'm happy to discuss this further, of course.- Ich ( talk) 14:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I apologize for my edits to Menzies/Hawk/Howard governments. I saw quite a few editors mass delete unsourced content and decided to follow what they were doing. However, after reading the MoS in terms of removing content, I realized I was mistaken. Ak-eater06 ( talk) 02:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
I was opening a bunch of pages and accidentally hit the rollback button. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, please note that it is very rarely acceptable to use news or popular-science web reports as citations in science articles. Some of those are garbled; if they have any merit, it is always better to cite the research reports that the news was based on. The more reputable outlets provide links to the original authors (and sometimes even to the research reports). Of course it is always possible to search for the species and mechanisms involved to locate the actual science involved. Many thanks for your understanding, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 10:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I notice your recent creation of Institute of Modern Art. The references you use are links to their website, which is not independent information. I’m happy to collaborate to amend that with research, but can’t just now. Are you able to make a start on that please? Cheers,
Jamesmcardle (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink!! How are you going? I love your work on this platform and I'm regretful that we don't chat more. Just thought you would like to have a look at the Death of Kumanjayi Walker article (currently entitled Death of Arnold Walker) and see what you think. I've tried to add to it with constructive edits but they keep getting reverted, I would regard your input as highly valuable. I understand if your busy doing other things but I think it's definitely worth getting involved in this article to get a bit of level-headed consensus. Thanks heaps! Dippiljemmy ( talk) 23:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey I just wanted to say thanks for closing the move request and moving the page. I was indeed in support, sorry I should have made that more explicit before you closed it! Dauwenkust ( talk) 03:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, sorry to bother you! I created a disambiguation page in place of the redirect: Kingdom of Britain. I'm not sure if I did everything right, please take a look. I will be very grateful, thanks! -- 145.15.244.234 ( talk) 13:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Dear Laterthanyouthink, as you were so kind to inform me, i try to do the favor vice versa :-)
21.04.2022 Vincent Animation in Adelaide https://concreteplayground.com/sydney/arts-entertainment/illuminate-adelaide-2022-program (starting july 1)
Kind regards, -- Naomi Hennig ( talk) 12:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, in this edit you indicated that owner does not show in the infobox. The reason it does not show is that {{ Infobox rugby league club}} does not have owner as a parameter. If you want it added then discuss on the templates talk page. Keith D ( talk) 19:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, there is a discussion raging at the moment that will hopefully lead to a formal end to the debate and edit warring around inclusion of Aboriginal placenames in articles. I have greatly appreciated your input before on this issue and if you have the energy it'd be great to have your contribution. Noticeboard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poketama ( talk • contribs) 13:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Just to let you know it's not good form to be changing links to an article before consensus is reached on the proposed move. This particular one is probably uncontroversial, but its the sort of thing people can get their noses out of joint over. Renaming is the sort of task that AWB is really good for & if consensus is reached, as I expect it will be, I'm happy to run it. -- Find bruce ( talk) 22:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Is it against the rules to remove red links? Cause no one but you seemed to have an issue. I remove them because I think there is "no need" to have a link there if it's not linking to anything. 2600:1702:2A40:3E40:D56:C93E:5486:4FFD ( talk) 23:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink, Just wanted to discuss your removal of an objection from the Statement from the Heart page. You gave the justification as 'editorialising'. Please note that it is historical that indigenous relationships to land are not based in 'ownership of the soil'. And that land ownership is a market construct which has caused tremendous hard and alienation to dispossessed communities. It is an idea that is objectionable to many indigenous people - as demonstrated by the Oodgeroo Noonuccal quote provided. This objection is historical, consistent with core indigenous belief, and certainly not 'editorialising' or based on some sort of subjective opinion. I'd ask that you refrain from removing it again but I'm happy to discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EarthCommoner ( talk • contribs) 03:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Laterthanyouthink
Thank you for creating Mistake Creek massacre.
User:Mako001, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Do you intend to work much more on this article? I ask so that, if you are, I'll keep out the way to avoid edit conflicts, as I plan to do some expansion myself if you aren't going to.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mako001}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Laterthanyouthink
Thank you for creating Antipodean Film Festival.
User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for your addition to Wikipedia for the Antipodean Film Festival. Please continue to add to this article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whoisjohngalt}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Whoisjohngalt ( talk) 20:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink. Thank you for creating Gallipoli Art Prize, which I just reviewed. I reworded part to remove a short stretch of copied or only slightly altered text. The longest verbatim copied material was 12 words long. I see you've received prior warnings to attend more carefully to your paraphrasing. I prefer not to template the regulars, but please count this among the notices you've received. It would help if you could review your recent article creations or added text to ensure nothing was copied. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 17:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited True Colours (Australian TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrernte.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
I reverted this , MBFC is generally unreliable per the Perennial sources list. Many thanks! VickKiang ( talk) 03:46, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases. The source may lack an editorial team, have a poor reputation for fact-checking, fail to correct errors, be self-published, or present user-generated content, so I don't think mentioning that for Cosmos is notable enough. Many thanks! VickKiang ( talk) 04:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give "Steven McGregor" a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Steven McGregor. This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ged UK 09:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the LTA from Australia that we've monitored in the past, a new range was brought to my attention; after blocking that range, a named account complained to me that was clearly the same user editing from that range; see User_talk:Victorianchan#Block_evasion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink,
I saw that you recently contributed to the article on YouGov, and wondered if I could ask your advice on a related matter. I am an employee at the company and noticed that the section titled Allegations of poll manipulation is slightly out of date. As you may be aware, in the time since this section was written and edited, Chris Curtis has clarified his initial statements somewhat, which was also covered in tier one media in the UK.
I’d appreciate your thoughts on adding in a few words to reflect this update, which I have tried to code up below. What do you think?
‘’Curtis, on 9 June 2022 using his own Twitter account clarified his earlier statements, posting that he accepts that the results “were pulled because of concerns other members of the team had about the methodology”. [1] He also confirmed that he accepted that Zahawi had not played any role in the decision to pull the initial results.’’ [2]
Looking forward to any assistance and guidance you can share.
Asfarmer - 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
References
"AUSTRALIAN WRITERS AND ARTISTS' UNION".
Daily Herald. Vol. 1, , no. 191. South Australia. 14 October 1910. p. 8. Retrieved 12 August 2022 – via National Library of Australia.{{
cite news}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link)
but looks blurry and has not been corrected... grrr JarrahTree 13:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Why have you removed the date of birth? IMDB is a more reliable source than most of those cited in this article. 195.191.66.225 ( talk) 17:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sozvezdie (film festival), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
PRAXIDICAE🌈 11:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Adelaide Film Festival 2020 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Laterthanyouthink,
Thanks for your help and advice on the Stuffed toy article. I wasn’t sure what sort of reception I would get, especially because there weren’t any super active editors on the article, so it was nice to interact with a more experienced editor. Your tips on wikilinks and on checking the images in the mobile version were particularly helpful, and I applied them to another article I was working on as well. Thanks for the positive experience! -- Lhill21 ( talk) 21:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice on this disambiguation thing, laterthanyouthink, and thanks for reading my articles. I might end up doing Lawn Hill but there's so much other damn interesting Australian and Pacific colonial history out there that needs to go on Wikipedia so I don't know when I'll get around to it! Let me know if there's any other topics you think I could add to. Cheers. Dippiljemmy ( talk) 01:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, Dippiljemmy, that's great. I'll get back to that one one day too. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 11:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thank you very much for your help. We have finished our page on Wikipedia, can you give some suggestions in order to make it approved, Draft: Rocca di Manerba del Garda. Thank you in advance. Milan20MA ( talk) 08:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink, you may be interested in the Kaurna cultural resources on the City of Charles Sturt website, and this link in particular - Yerta Bulti (Port River and Estuary region). Cheers, Bahudhara ( talk) 07:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I notice you linked, back in May, to a website full of pirated material to add a direct link for someone to download someone else's copyrighted materials illegally with this edit. Note I've removed the edit so it can no longer be viewed. As you're no doubt aware by now, having had several conversations with others, you cannot add copyrighted material, or links to copyright violations, on Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 17:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Laterthanyouthink,
Thank you for creating Council for Aboriginal Rights.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Hi - thanks for creating this, it's a very interesting and notable organisation. My main comment is that the piece is under-referenced, for example the entire section titled "Foundation" contains only one reference.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Goldsztajn ( talk) 09:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Goldsztajn after a long and roundabout side-track onto anti-slavery societies and other organisations and related articles, I returned to this one to add a couple of those extra citations as Further reading, because I really cannot do any more on it now, with so many other things to attend to (and even some real life in between). But to follow up with the JSTOR limitations - it seems to behave peculiarly with me. I have now found that "view XX search matches" text you mentioned, which only shows if I click straight onto the link after searching, and not if I right click to open in a new tab (as I usually do), BUT, only shows for some articles and not others! (The Pilbara one works, but none of the others that came up on my search list.) And I couldn't find anything relevant in the Pearl Gibbs article. Anyhoo... As I said, I'm done with that one for now, but that search trick on JSTOR will come in handy when it works for me in the future! Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 03:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For ensuring that I did not add an incorrectly identified image into a Wikipedia article and for so gently pointing out my error! Shyamal ( talk) 05:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Laterthanyouthink
Thank you for creating Birmingham Ladies Society for the Relief of Negro Slaves.
User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Celestina007 ( talk) 07:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink, I am one of the creator of this Wikipedia page Draft:Cinque Vette Park, Lombardy, I would like to ask you if you could give a look at it. We submitted it on the 29th of November but it has not been accepted yet. My team and I would really appreciate that. Thank you in advance. Bighope71 ( talk) 15:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Ok, I understand you have other things to attend to. Thank you for taking a glimpse anyway. Bighope71 ( talk) 10:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your recent contributions to Coon cheese . I have edited a small portion of these. They were to remove talk in the article about citations and to remove excess information about the new name of the cheese.
If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page or open discussion on the article's. Thank you.
AussieWikiDan ( talk) 14:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to finish filling in the templates I added to the top of the page. See Template:Infobox ship for documentation on this group of templates. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 16:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm a very occasional intervener in wiki editing, and am not even sure if this will get to you, but I wanted to let you know of a couple additions to entry on Christopher Pearson, all based on my own personal knowledge of him from university days in Adelaide. Your edit history on this entry suggests you have sliced quite a lot from earlier content, shortening the profile considerably. For me, what's been removed looks interesting enough to have earned its place... but as I say, I'm an amateur here. Best wishes! Johanssenfs ( talk) 23:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your thoufhtful and detailed reply. I have been looking for conformation of TA's role as pall bearer at CP's funeral but so far no records. As I recall the date of the funeral was during a tough time for TA, though whether as lead up to an election or something else I am not sure. It was especially memorable for this, the event bring held some distance from Adelaide on the Fleurieu Pdninsula where CP owned a modest country retreat. I'm travelling to Adekiade in a couple months and I'll stay on the case to find evidence. Cheers. Johanssenfs ( talk) 20:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Laterthankyouthink, i've written an article on Vincent for the German wikipedia. I also have contacted "The Monthly" and got the article you just inserted into the article and thus could give the info in my text. If you want to read my article - which by the way was featured this month at the startpage of the German wikipedia in the section "did you know?" and had 9400 clicks - you could use google-translator. Just add the url into the left window - then choose "German to English" and click enter - then at the right window it'll give the url for the translated text. I have written differently than the english article, also named the exhibitions and gave reference-links etc. - perhaps we could add some of it into the english article? I'm not quite sure whether this is a strange question in your ears? Here is the link to the German article: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Namatjira , Kind regards, -- Gyanda ( talk) 12:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed - and appreciate - you creating redirects such as UNSW Canberra at ADFA. However, I'd appreciate it if you used {{ redirect category shell}} to wrap the redirect categories, even when there is only a single category. This allows for potential automatic categorization (though none would currently apply to the redirects you've made), as well as consistency in looks between different redirect pages. Thanks! Elli ( talk | contribs) 05:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
{{
rcat shell}}
to be a useful shortcut)
Elli (
talk |
contribs) 06:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Not so much unwilling to be drawn into as carefully watching & considering how I might assist in moving the matter forward - & I don't have an answer to that as yet. -- Find bruce ( talk) 06:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I have made a redirect from Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources to its predecessor Department of Industry, Innovation and Science. I don't write government department articles, but noticed you added the paragraph about the new name, some months after an IP changed the title on the infobox to the new name. My solution is not satisfactory either, but I'm not sure what the "right" fix is from here. -- Scott Davis Talk 10:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I don't see why we have to state the total when the percentage is already included, and why Islam is broken down by nationality. The only reason I can think of is to make a political point. "See how many there are? Of course they deserve a mosque". Am I wrong? Not that I disagree, but it's irrelevant. All that's required here is a simple percentage. All demographics sections use percentage rather than total. - HappyWaldo ( talk) 02:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
For your recent work improving Far-right politics in Australia. Cheers mate! Bacon drum 23:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC) |
hi, just on the side, I had a look at Dianekmt talk page, no discussions at the time she added her article to the then empty Kabi page, which might have been redirected already at the time. Its also for me difficult to distinguish who has more right to do things on here and who not, who is independent but doesn't explain, and who is violating. You know each other and also see, we don't. So with that status Dianekmt is deeply hurt and contacted Alex Lum Vice President - Wikimedia Australia who gave her the advise and explained how to delete the redirect and reestablish the page. I received that email from her and acted on it. Wikigetsme123 ( talk) 08:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
An Original Barnstar | ||
This Barnstar awarded in recognition of the dedication, effort and scrupulous attention you have devoted to articles dealing with Australian aborigines. Nishidani ( talk) 10:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
Palm Island, Queensland, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Whiteguru ( talk) 08:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. As far as I can tell an article title is mostly a way to navigate to a particular article. I care about the content of articles and verification, but article titles are generally low down my interests. As Australian law, Australian laws, Law of Australia, Laws of Australia, Australian legal system and Legal system of Australia all point to the same article, I don't much care which is the final resting place. There are exceptions, particularly where its the name of a person or concerns the conduct of a person. Sorry I can't be of more help -- Find bruce ( talk) 04:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you are right. I misinterpreted some parts of the study after looking at it again. I will revert my edits. I also found that more recent studies found contradicting evidence (such as Boer et al. 2020). I am sorry. Could you please accepted the reverted version in Negrito. Thank you for understanding. Have a nice day. 213.162.73.136 ( talk) 08:28, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Mz7 ( talk) 23:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Last year you added an "update needed" banner to the section "Business career" of Samuel Vestey, 3rd Baron Vestey. I note you and others have done multiple edits to the article since (including around his death). Is the banner still needed and what else do you think still needs updating?— Rod talk 15:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Do you have a source saying Flagey Building? Like Empire State Building. Flagey (building)? - Why not just keep as it was? You'd probably mot translate you name when going to a different country. - I have no time to check, - if you have a source fine. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
I'll be coming back to it tomorrow, and will ensure that it's widely used (per WP:ENGLISH). Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 09:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Terrorism Research Initiative, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me 16:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The "1865?" ship you have listed at the list of ships named Lalla Rookh appears to have been built in 1864. What do you think? Mjroots ( talk) 07:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the update [1]. However, the German wikipedia already had (English) references about its rediscovery in 2020. The article still mentions its extinct status in the categories. Also in [2]. Shouldn't they be updated as well? -- VanBuren ( talk) 10:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.nma.gov.au/exhibitions/yalangbara/yalangbara-region, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
It's an interesting case and you have summarised it well. It didn't decide any great legal principle - the copying was pretty blatant : I assume you have seen the images & carpet at page 13 of Janke. Instead it's importance was a practical one of enforcing the copyright of individual first nations artists. I have tidied up a couple of references in accordance with the Australian Legal Style Guide, but that's a minor issue. You could certainly justify a stand alone article, the approach taken in relation to Australian case articles is the title would be Milpurrurru v Indofurn Pty Ltd and the layout would be something like Wotton v Queensland (No 5). Have you looked at the T-Shirts case yet? (Bulun Bulun v R & T Textiles Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1082) highlighted a shortcoming of the application of copyright law as it applies to the individual artist and not to the Ganalbingu people whose stories were reproduced in the work. -- Find bruce ( talk) 06:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
What's all this about? -- Pete ( talk) 02:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Why have you added two additional subfamilies and used Pitts,, Wasbauer & Von Dohlen 2005 as the citation? From the abstract they confirmed that there were four subfamilies
“Notocyphinae sensu Shimizu (1994) was nested within Pompilinae and that Epipompilinae sensu Shimizu (1994) was nested within Ctenocerinae”
“strict consensus tree gave the following relationships: (Ceropalinae + (Pepsinae + (Ctenocerinae + Pompilinae))).”
Quetzal1964 ( talk) 13:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink, I'm a bit baffled by your addition to Surprise. Did you mean "includes HMS Surprize"? Leschnei ( talk) 22:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I restored my edits on Draft:4A Centre for Contemporary Asian Art which you had reverted, since they help. I am not sure if you know this, but it is notoriously difficult to get an article on a gallery published, since the reviews of shows held there count as coverage on the artists and not on the gallery itself. From the looks of it, this article has a similar notability problem as most sourcing is primary. I will poke around and see if I can find some sources. --- Possibly ☎ 01:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Possibly: It turned out to be my internet connectivity problem. I've been adding to the article over the past couple of days and just resubmitted it, intending to do a last proof-read tomorrow. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 10:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Dear Laterthanyouthink,
I see you reverted my additions to the Kuku Yalanjis in name of a neutral point of view. If we accept your understanding and use of this position as unilaterally and tacitly formulated by you then, comparatively speaking, for instance, - we should not speak about any history of the Germans and Germany before the Australians contacted them in the 20th c - we ought to limit any history of the Germans to that of their contacts with Australians - we would need to limit any discussion of German langauge and culture to Australian scholars' monographs on these subjects - we would need to deny and disregard the existence of Chinese culture and language prior to the founding of the PRC in 1949 - we should see the ethnic cleansing of Turks/Muslims from Greece and Bulgaria as 'removals' - while the wartime genocide of Jews we should present as 'mass murders.'
Hence, this kind of neutral point of view is nothing other than: - denial of genocide and ethnic cleansing - denial of any pre-invasion history to the Kuku Yalanjis - approval of forced assimilation - approval of depriving the Kuku Yalanjis of agency.
Such attitudes in writing about an ethnic group/nation are indicative of racism and (cultural) imperialism. If in doubt of what I am proposing, try to apply this supposedly 'neutral point of view' to writing about history, languages and cultures of European nations and states. And then see what other Wikipedians may think.
I am not going to engage in any eitorial sparring enjoy this specific kind of self-serving western 'neutrality' that justified cocnentration camp-like compulsory boarding schools for 'natives' children,' snatched from their parents to 'civilize' into 'white fellas.' Hyrdlak ( talk) 10:18, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Hyrdlak
Hello, Laterthanyouthink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Terrorism Research Initiative, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Laterthanyouthink
Thank you for creating Wide Open Space (festival).
User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work on the references. I had a great time reading them!!!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Whiteguru ( talk) 07:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to Aboriginal Centre for the Performing Arts has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 14:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
On 1 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article David Gulpilil, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 11:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed that you have made a few edits on the 'Australian Aboriginal Progress Association' article and was wondering if you could help me out. After doing some research I noticed that the title of the organisation is actually 'Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association', rather than 'progress'. Could you confirm or deny this by any chance? As the sources I have found have led me to believe the title of the article is wrong but just thought I'd check with another user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwal6418 ( talk • contribs) 11:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Great! Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwal6418 ( talk • contribs) 09:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Hey Laterthanyouthink, thanks for creating these new national park articles :) I'm just in the process of trying to update these on Wikipedia's sister site Wikivoyage, and so your updates on Wikipedia really helps. SHB2000 ( talk) 04:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Oh yes SHB2000 - thanks again - I had discovered them and have the tabs open, planning to come back to them! With these fiddly bits taking so long, I'm not confident I'm going to finish today, having some real life to attend to as well... Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 06:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Hey Laterthanyouthink, I'm trying to locate an image I could use for the Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association article. I'm having trouble finding images not restricted by copyright. I've tried flickr and the like, but I was wondering if you could point me in the right direction? Thank you! Bwal6418 ( talk) 11:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Bwal6418
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ningla A-Na and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Ningla A-Na until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 08:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to disagree with your reversion of my edit on Hillsong Church UK. At the time of Clarke's comments (Sunday, May 31), enough investigations into Floyd's murder had been completed for Chauvin to have been arrested and charged (on Thursday, May 29) with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. When the prosecutor charged Chauvin, and when the jury later convicted him, they did not say "this otherwise benign death from May 2020 has now retroactively been transmuted into a murder". Rather, their ruling recognized and affirmed that Floyd's murder was indeed a murder at the time when it happened. This may seem like splitting epistomological hairs, but I feel the distinction is important. I don't think it makes sense either to emphasize "the death for which Chauvin would later be convicted of murder": all convicted murderers have a delay between when they commit the murder and when the jury convicts them. It would require excessive linguistic gymnastics such as "refusing to comment on the murder of George Floyd, for which Chauvin had already been charged but not yet convicted" or "refusing to comment on the death of George Floyd that a jury would later rule to be murder". This additional phrasing might add some temporal precision, but only at the expense of clarity: the focus is taken away from Clarke's unwillingness to comment on Floyd's murder.
And for what it's worth, the wikilink was pointed to murder of George Floyd; when you reverted it, it pointed to "death of George Floyd", which is a redirect to "murder of George Floyd". I'm happy to discuss this further, of course.- Ich ( talk) 14:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I apologize for my edits to Menzies/Hawk/Howard governments. I saw quite a few editors mass delete unsourced content and decided to follow what they were doing. However, after reading the MoS in terms of removing content, I realized I was mistaken. Ak-eater06 ( talk) 02:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
I was opening a bunch of pages and accidentally hit the rollback button. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, please note that it is very rarely acceptable to use news or popular-science web reports as citations in science articles. Some of those are garbled; if they have any merit, it is always better to cite the research reports that the news was based on. The more reputable outlets provide links to the original authors (and sometimes even to the research reports). Of course it is always possible to search for the species and mechanisms involved to locate the actual science involved. Many thanks for your understanding, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 10:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I notice your recent creation of Institute of Modern Art. The references you use are links to their website, which is not independent information. I’m happy to collaborate to amend that with research, but can’t just now. Are you able to make a start on that please? Cheers,
Jamesmcardle (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink!! How are you going? I love your work on this platform and I'm regretful that we don't chat more. Just thought you would like to have a look at the Death of Kumanjayi Walker article (currently entitled Death of Arnold Walker) and see what you think. I've tried to add to it with constructive edits but they keep getting reverted, I would regard your input as highly valuable. I understand if your busy doing other things but I think it's definitely worth getting involved in this article to get a bit of level-headed consensus. Thanks heaps! Dippiljemmy ( talk) 23:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey I just wanted to say thanks for closing the move request and moving the page. I was indeed in support, sorry I should have made that more explicit before you closed it! Dauwenkust ( talk) 03:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, sorry to bother you! I created a disambiguation page in place of the redirect: Kingdom of Britain. I'm not sure if I did everything right, please take a look. I will be very grateful, thanks! -- 145.15.244.234 ( talk) 13:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Dear Laterthanyouthink, as you were so kind to inform me, i try to do the favor vice versa :-)
21.04.2022 Vincent Animation in Adelaide https://concreteplayground.com/sydney/arts-entertainment/illuminate-adelaide-2022-program (starting july 1)
Kind regards, -- Naomi Hennig ( talk) 12:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, in this edit you indicated that owner does not show in the infobox. The reason it does not show is that {{ Infobox rugby league club}} does not have owner as a parameter. If you want it added then discuss on the templates talk page. Keith D ( talk) 19:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, there is a discussion raging at the moment that will hopefully lead to a formal end to the debate and edit warring around inclusion of Aboriginal placenames in articles. I have greatly appreciated your input before on this issue and if you have the energy it'd be great to have your contribution. Noticeboard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poketama ( talk • contribs) 13:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Just to let you know it's not good form to be changing links to an article before consensus is reached on the proposed move. This particular one is probably uncontroversial, but its the sort of thing people can get their noses out of joint over. Renaming is the sort of task that AWB is really good for & if consensus is reached, as I expect it will be, I'm happy to run it. -- Find bruce ( talk) 22:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Is it against the rules to remove red links? Cause no one but you seemed to have an issue. I remove them because I think there is "no need" to have a link there if it's not linking to anything. 2600:1702:2A40:3E40:D56:C93E:5486:4FFD ( talk) 23:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink, Just wanted to discuss your removal of an objection from the Statement from the Heart page. You gave the justification as 'editorialising'. Please note that it is historical that indigenous relationships to land are not based in 'ownership of the soil'. And that land ownership is a market construct which has caused tremendous hard and alienation to dispossessed communities. It is an idea that is objectionable to many indigenous people - as demonstrated by the Oodgeroo Noonuccal quote provided. This objection is historical, consistent with core indigenous belief, and certainly not 'editorialising' or based on some sort of subjective opinion. I'd ask that you refrain from removing it again but I'm happy to discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EarthCommoner ( talk • contribs) 03:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Laterthanyouthink
Thank you for creating Mistake Creek massacre.
User:Mako001, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Do you intend to work much more on this article? I ask so that, if you are, I'll keep out the way to avoid edit conflicts, as I plan to do some expansion myself if you aren't going to.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mako001}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Laterthanyouthink
Thank you for creating Antipodean Film Festival.
User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for your addition to Wikipedia for the Antipodean Film Festival. Please continue to add to this article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whoisjohngalt}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Whoisjohngalt ( talk) 20:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink. Thank you for creating Gallipoli Art Prize, which I just reviewed. I reworded part to remove a short stretch of copied or only slightly altered text. The longest verbatim copied material was 12 words long. I see you've received prior warnings to attend more carefully to your paraphrasing. I prefer not to template the regulars, but please count this among the notices you've received. It would help if you could review your recent article creations or added text to ensure nothing was copied. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 17:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited True Colours (Australian TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrernte.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
I reverted this , MBFC is generally unreliable per the Perennial sources list. Many thanks! VickKiang ( talk) 03:46, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases. The source may lack an editorial team, have a poor reputation for fact-checking, fail to correct errors, be self-published, or present user-generated content, so I don't think mentioning that for Cosmos is notable enough. Many thanks! VickKiang ( talk) 04:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give "Steven McGregor" a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Steven McGregor. This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ged UK 09:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the LTA from Australia that we've monitored in the past, a new range was brought to my attention; after blocking that range, a named account complained to me that was clearly the same user editing from that range; see User_talk:Victorianchan#Block_evasion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Laterthanyouthink,
I saw that you recently contributed to the article on YouGov, and wondered if I could ask your advice on a related matter. I am an employee at the company and noticed that the section titled Allegations of poll manipulation is slightly out of date. As you may be aware, in the time since this section was written and edited, Chris Curtis has clarified his initial statements somewhat, which was also covered in tier one media in the UK.
I’d appreciate your thoughts on adding in a few words to reflect this update, which I have tried to code up below. What do you think?
‘’Curtis, on 9 June 2022 using his own Twitter account clarified his earlier statements, posting that he accepts that the results “were pulled because of concerns other members of the team had about the methodology”. [1] He also confirmed that he accepted that Zahawi had not played any role in the decision to pull the initial results.’’ [2]
Looking forward to any assistance and guidance you can share.
Asfarmer - 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
References
"AUSTRALIAN WRITERS AND ARTISTS' UNION".
Daily Herald. Vol. 1, , no. 191. South Australia. 14 October 1910. p. 8. Retrieved 12 August 2022 – via National Library of Australia.{{
cite news}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link)
but looks blurry and has not been corrected... grrr JarrahTree 13:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Why have you removed the date of birth? IMDB is a more reliable source than most of those cited in this article. 195.191.66.225 ( talk) 17:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sozvezdie (film festival), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
PRAXIDICAE🌈 11:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Adelaide Film Festival 2020 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |