|
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Verbal chat 16:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your note at the fringe science notice board
Hi, I put your note on the main noticeboard page, which is where questions such as yours go. Here's a link to it, if you have anything to add. [ [1]] -- Rocksanddirt ( talk) 17:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you.
Please confirm in the talk page if the article is well sourced. Thanks. Imad marie ( talk) 08:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think the quotes can speak for themselves. Thank you again for providing them. Larkusix ( talk) 12:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
3RR Warning on Enhanced interrogation techniques
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Dlabtot (
talk) 18:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the warning, but I didn't revert more than 3 times in total. What is your opinion, how to proceed further? Larkusix ( talk) 00:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Larkusix: I have reverted your change regarding the npov tag at the article in question, No consensus has been reached under any standard. I would suggest we take this matter to the talk page so that a consensus can be reached on how we can all improve this article to achieve neutrality. I realize that these issues are obviously important to you, and that it may be difficult to incorporate a differing view point into an article with an issue you may have strong feelings about, but that is the entire collaberative point of Wikipedia. Please work with other editors in the future on the article in question before removing tags. Thank you.-- Yachtsman1 ( talk) 15:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
|
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Verbal chat 16:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your note at the fringe science notice board
Hi, I put your note on the main noticeboard page, which is where questions such as yours go. Here's a link to it, if you have anything to add. [ [1]] -- Rocksanddirt ( talk) 17:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you.
Please confirm in the talk page if the article is well sourced. Thanks. Imad marie ( talk) 08:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think the quotes can speak for themselves. Thank you again for providing them. Larkusix ( talk) 12:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
3RR Warning on Enhanced interrogation techniques
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Dlabtot (
talk) 18:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the warning, but I didn't revert more than 3 times in total. What is your opinion, how to proceed further? Larkusix ( talk) 00:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Larkusix: I have reverted your change regarding the npov tag at the article in question, No consensus has been reached under any standard. I would suggest we take this matter to the talk page so that a consensus can be reached on how we can all improve this article to achieve neutrality. I realize that these issues are obviously important to you, and that it may be difficult to incorporate a differing view point into an article with an issue you may have strong feelings about, but that is the entire collaberative point of Wikipedia. Please work with other editors in the future on the article in question before removing tags. Thank you.-- Yachtsman1 ( talk) 15:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)